Govt sets up expert group to collate caste count

The government has been criticised by parties, including Samajwadi Party, JD(U), RJD and DMK for refraining from releasing the caste-based data in its first Socio Economic and Caste Census (SECC).

New Delhi | Updated: July 16, 2015 6:09 pm
caste census data, niti ayog, arun jaitley, caste, caste census, latest news Jaitley said that it will be good if the states, who are “politicising” it, send their recommendations of caste consolidation at the earliest.

Amid a controversy over not releasing of caste census data, the government today set up an expert group headed by NITI Ayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya to collate caste count even as it blamed the states for not being able to complete the consolidation of different categories.

The decision was taken in a meeting of the Union Cabinet chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Announcing it, Finance Minster Arun Jaitley said, “A decision was taken today to set up a committee chaired by Vice Chairman of NITI Ayog, which will classify this caste data. When the task is completed, it will be made public at an appropriate time.”

He said that the decision was in line with the one taken during the UPA government in May 2011.

The government has been criticised by parties, including Samajwadi Party, JD(U), RJD and DMK for refraining from releasing the caste-based data in its first Socio Economic and Caste Census (SECC).

The SECC data released on July 3 is first in eight decades after 1912.

Brushing aside suggestions that the government avoided giving the caste count in the survey report due to political reasons ahead of Bihar polls, Jaitley said that it will be good if the states, who are “politicising” it, send their recommendations of caste consolidation at the earliest.

He said that the caste census conducted by the Registrar General of India has come out with 46 lakh categories of caste, subcaste, different surnames in the caste and clan names, which have been sent to the states eight-nine months back for clubbing them to consolidate the caste count.

He said that the government is keen to release the caste data at the earliest as soon as the states send the details because the committee headed by Panagariya will only then be able to classify it.

“It will be good that states, which are politicising it, send their caste consolidation recommendation at the earliest. They cannot hold back the recommendation and then say you please release it,” he said, adding so far most of the states have not been able to send the caste consolidation details.

The government could face a united opposition attack in the Monsoon Session of Parliament on the issue with parties like Congress, CPI(M), DMK, SP, RJD and JD(U) closing ranks.

While the government has rejected the charge that not releasing the caste count has anything to do with Bihar polls, Lalu Prasad’s RJD and Nitish Kumar’s JD(U), which have come together to fight the state’s Assembly election, have made a strong pitch to make it public in an apparent attempt to consolidate OBC votes.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. D
    Devi
    Jul 16, 2015 at 7:34 pm
    At last, a good sense prevailed. It is good that atleast, now the Government is involving NITI before releasing the final SECC data. At the time of release of the provisional data no technical expert - either from NITI or from the Ministry of Rural Development, was present in front of the cameras. Going forward let NITI insist that the provisional data is released via Open Government Data Platform as required under the National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy 2011 (NDSAP). NITI can get good analytical inputs from researchers for clifying the data. India, home to the largest number of deprived households (families) has a duty to teach the world on how to count their people and profile their socio economic status and present large volume of refined data through an open data platform. It is not a political convenience but an ethical obligation for good governance in a country where economic growth is not delivering its benefits to almost 50% households.
    Reply