• Associate Sponsor

Gopinath Ravindran: Resigned from ICHR over disagreements with chief Sudershan Rao

Ravindran told The Indian Express that the “immediate trigger” was his differences with council chairman Y Sudershan Rao over the minutes of a recent council meeting.

Written by Ruhi Tewari | New Delhi | Published: June 24, 2015 3:14 am
ICHR, HRD Ministry, Ravindran ICHR, Y Sudershan Rao, Indian Council of Historical Research Gopinath, ICHR Ravindran, Jamia Millia Islamia university, india news, nation news, Indian express Ravindran was managing editor of IHR. Rao, however, refused to clear the minutes.

Days after he resigned as member secretary of the prestigious Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) midway through his term, Gopinath Ravindran on Tuesday said his move followed disagreements with the council chairman as well as the leanings of a majority of council members.

Ravindran told The Indian Express that the “immediate trigger” was his differences with council chairman Y Sudershan Rao over the minutes of a recent council meeting.

Ravindran had opposed the council’s decision during a meeting in mid-May to throw out the editorial board and advisory committee of ‘Indian Historical Review’ that included eminent historian Romila Thapar. Ravindran was managing editor of IHR. Rao, however, refused to clear the minutes.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

“The immediate trigger was that the minutes of the meeting where the council decided to throw out the editorial board and advisory committee of IHR had not been signed by the chairperson till as late as yesterday, despite amendments. It is the member secretary that circulates the minutes but as courtesy I had sent them to the chairperson for him to sign so I could circulate it… I, anyway, am not in agreement with his views on history but if I can’t even record my disagreement, then what is the point of my being there,” he said.

Rao was appointed chairperson in July last year. Days into his new office, he had stirred a controversy with posts on his blog, including one praising the ancient caste system.

Ravindran also says he was not consulted adequately in the process of sending the recommendations for names of council members to the HRD Ministry when the new council was nominated earlier this year. “The tradition and convention is both the chairperson and member secretary together send the list of recommended names for the council to the ministry but the due process was not followed this time,” he said.

Concerns about a “saffron” tinge in the council after new members were nominated earlier this year have also surfaced. “It is not just a tinge… Barring one or two members, they all belong to the saffron or you can call it Hindutva or communal school of thought,” Ravindran said.

Ravindran, a historian on deputation from the Jamia Milia Islamia University, was appointed member secretary in 2013 under the Congress-led UPA II regime. The term of the member secretary is three years.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Māndhata
    Jun 24, 2015 at 6:26 am
    Well is there any rule that only Reddites are to permitted and not Saffronites? Did the Red School of thought ever permit "thousand thoughts to contend"?
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. Anil Maheshwari
      Jun 24, 2015 at 10:58 am
      The Marxist historians seem to be orphaned as the state funding to them has dried up. The issue was the revival of the Hindi edition of the prestigious IHR journal which was not being published by the ICHR under the tutelage of Marxists who seemed to have viewed Hindi in Deonagri script unsuited. The ICHR should come out with a detailed paper of the grants, funds availed by the historians during the last three decades and their utilisation.
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. S
        Sitaram
        Jun 26, 2015 at 3:29 am
        Comrade could not agree to disagree ... his way or else...
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. V
          V. Sethuraman
          Jun 24, 2015 at 3:42 am
          Why not the ICHR prescribe the Jawaharlal Nehru's book of " Discovery of India" as a text book for Social Science in schools rather the both the awkward looking views of historians of left and Hindutva leanings. Whenever the congress comes to power it packs the ICHR with leftist leaning historians and the BJP with hindutwa oriented historians. Why should the Indians be fooled with these people writings on Indian history? Why the secular intellectuals are silent on these two groups?
          (0)(0)
          Reply