Explain why you shouldn’t face action for Yakub’s execution coverage: Govt notice to 3 channels

Sources said the I&B ministry obtained video clips of the Chhota Shakeel phone-in and Yakub’s lawyer’s statement from the Electronic Media and Monitoring Centre to get the quotes which have been cited in the notice.

Written by P Vaidyanathan Iyer | New Delhi | Updated: August 8, 2015 8:44 pm
Yakub Memon, Yakub Memon news, Yakub Memon hanging, Yakub Memon death sentence, Yakub Memon TV coverage, Yakub Memon death news coverage, Yakub Memon channels coverage, Yakub Memon nagpur hanging,  yakub hanging, 1993 Mumbai blast, Supreme Court judges, india news, nation news 1993 Mumbai blasts convict Yakub Memon. (Source: Express Archive)

For the first time since it took charge, the NDA Government has issued separate show-cause notices to ABP News, NDTV 24×7 and Aaj Tak alleging that these three private news television channels showed disrespect to the judiciary and the President of India by airing certain content on the day 1993 Mumbai blasts convict Yakub Memon was hanged. The Union Information & Broadcasting Ministry has asked these channels to explain within 15 days why action should not be taken against them for broadcasting such content.

The content includes phone-in interviews of Chhota Shakeel on Aaj Tak and ABP News in which he claimed Yakub Memon was innocent and said that four mercy petitions were dismissed in a single day. He also alleged that justice had not been done and that he did not believe the court. NDTV 24×7 had aired an interview of Yakub Memon’s lawyer who spoke about how many countries have done away with the death penalty.

The show-cause notices to the channels invoke at least three sections including Section 1(d), Section 1(g) and Section 1(e) of Rule 6 of the Programme Code prescribed under the Cable Television Network Rules, 1994.

Section 1(d) states that no programme should be carried which contains anything “obscene, defamatory, deliberate, false and suggestive innuendos and half-truths.” Section 1(e) states that no programme should be carried in the cable service which is “likely to encourage or incite violence or contains anything against maintenance of law and order or which promote anti-national attitudes. Section 1(g) bars channels from carrying content which “contains aspersions against the integrity of the President and Judiciary”.

Yakub Memon’s hanging on July 30 came hours after an unprecedented late-night opening of the Supreme Court that eventually rejected a final plea for a stay on his execution. That order came 12 hours after the same bench had dismissed another writ petition by Yakub challenging the validity of the death warrant. Justices Dipak Misra, P C Pant and Amitava Roy also rejected objections raised by Justice Kurian Joseph a day earlier and said there was no legal lacuna in dealing with Yakub’s curative petition which was dismissed on July 21.

Sources said the I&B ministry obtained video clips of the Chhota Shakeel phone-in and Yakub’s lawyer’s statement from the Electronic Media and Monitoring Centre (EMMC) to get the quotes which have been cited in the notice.

At least three orders prohibiting transmission of channels for a period ranging from one day to 30 days have been issued by the Government so far. NDTV Good Times and TLC were taken off air for a day for content described as adult and Al-Jazeera was prohibited for five days after it did not show Jammu & Kashmir as an integral part of India in the country’s map.

Once the channels reply to the show-cause notice, an inter-ministerial committee, which includes officials from the Home, External Affairs and Defence ministries, will review their response and decide on the next step.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    Oct 25, 2016 at 5:56 am
    I am Sarwar Linckon from West Bengal, Murshidabad, India.I am an auto mobile doploma engineer.I came Soudi Arabia, Riyadh on 08/05/2016 through Ismail Enterprise. My agent is Firoj Khan (ph: 9892114687). My agent cheat with me and trapped me in Soudi Arabia. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;As per contract I was appointed for technical job (auto electrician). They said that my work will be car diagnosis by computer with a monthly payment of 1800 Soudi riyal(SR). But after joining they give me car AC cleaning, repairing and house keeping work with a less ry of 1200 SR per month. I don't want to do this job. I came here for earning money for my Brother's heart transplant. But from last four months they stopped my ry and take my pport by cheating and don't sending me India. I requested my company owner and manager repeatedly from last four months but they don't give any positive response.Car AC cleaning work is very harmful as poisonous chloro fluoro carbon gas is used for this.I am becoming ill day by day but they don't arranging any treatment for me as I have not Ikama. I complained at Indian Emby, Riyadhlt;br/gt;. My complaint no is LCMS3552. I also complained at Madad portal, my grievance ID is SB2SAD101834116. Now my agent Firoj Khan threating me for withdrawl my complain otherwise they don't send me India. I am in big trouble please help me.Please save my life.
    1. S
      Oct 25, 2016 at 5:58 am
      Sushma ji please help me
      1. S
        Subodh khanna
        Jan 28, 2016 at 1:45 pm
        cancel ther licences and shut them down for glorifying a terrorist who waged war on india
        1. A
          Aug 8, 2015 at 7:49 pm
          It should have been done long back.the freedom of expression has been stretched to the limits of having freedom to become anti nationals by some news channels.
          1. A
            Aug 8, 2015 at 7:20 pm
            Agree... M sure such a big decision is not taken without any evidences against him...
            1. K
              Aug 8, 2015 at 12:12 pm
              Well done. Great action by the government.... I think IE should also be given notice.
              1. R
                Rohit khare
                Aug 8, 2015 at 10:45 am
                All three media houses fully corrupt and anti national channels. Should be ban#
                1. S
                  Aug 9, 2015 at 3:21 am
                  This is a dangerous trend about the high handedness of the government... Similar to what happened during the emergency period. Though parellels cannto be drawn but the outcome is controlling what the media airs. It is sad and and deplorable what the news channels did. But the government should not be the one deciding what I news they put out... This is just the beginning of curbing civil liberty.. They are already telling you what to eat, this is the begining to what you should hear. The more we agree to such moves which are driven by our emotions the more we give up our rights.
                  1. Load More Comments