• Associate Sponsor

Congress, TMC and BJD to seek total withdrawal of NDA’s land bill

Sources said the letter seeking withdrawal of NDA's bill given by TMC also mentions that the state Assembly has already passed a resolution against the measure.

By: PTI | New Delhi | Published: July 25, 2015 7:45 pm

With the deadline of the Parliamentary panel on land nearing to a close, at least three opposition parties including Congress have decided to seek total withdrawal of NDA’s contentious land bill.

Two of them, BJD and Trinamool Congress have already written to the Joint Committee of Parliament headed by BJP MP S S Ahluwalia in this regard while Congress will give its amendments on Monday when the panel meets.

“Our demand is to withdraw the bill completely. We are totally against it,” a senior Trinamool Congress leader told PTI.

Sources said the letter seeking withdrawal of NDA’s bill given by TMC also mentions that the state Assembly has already passed a resolution against the measure.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

Last month, the West Bengal Assembly had unanimously passed a private resolution demanding withdrawal of the “draconian” Land ordinance promulgated by the BJP-led NDA government at the Centre.

While the Trinamool Congress wants a total withdrawal of the amendments brought by the government, BJD among other things favours making the land losers stakeholders when land is acquired for profitable ventures.

The party wants that land owners should be given share in profit if the land is acquired for setting up industry and other commercial ventures, sources said.

In the amendments, the BJD has pitched for bringing back the consent and SIA provisions into the bill.

A senior Congress leader speaking on the condition of anonymity said the party will move its amendments tomorrow.

“We are hopeful that when parties cast their vote on separate clauses of the bill, they will vote with us as there is a near unanimity among opposition parties that the bill should go,” the leader said.

Congress has already written to the panel that the compensation in the law which is four times of market value in urban area and between two to four times in rural areas should be made uniform four times in all areas, a demand which the government may find difficult to accept.

Other parties are also expected to submit amendments in next few days. The 30-member Joint Committee has 11 BJP MPs. They need five more to clear the bill with a majority.

While the 2013 law required the consent of 80 per cent of land-owners to be obtained for private projects and that of 70 per cent for PPP ones, the present Bill exempts five categories from this provision — defence, rural infrastructure, affordable housing, industrial corridors and infrastructure projects, including public-private partnership (PPP) projects where the government owns the land.

The 2013 Act also required that a social impact assessment be conducted to identify affected families and calculate the social impact when land is acquired. This provision has been done away with.

Since the Joint Committee of Parliament is different from a department-related standing committee or an investigative Joint Parliamentary Committee, it will present a bill in Parliament based on the amendments moved by members as well as the government.

Once the amendments have been moved, they would be discussed on a clause-by-clause basis. If there is a unanimity, the bill will be adopted. Otherwise, there could also be a vote on the amendments. The Committee will then table the bill — as reported by it — in both Houses of Parliament.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. R
    Raje
    Jul 26, 2015 at 3:34 am
    Why do you live n work in a city then? Go n buy 2 acres of land and show w India what magic you can do with state govt local policies. Preach before you teach.
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. R
      Rangaesh Gadasalli
      Jul 26, 2015 at 12:06 am
      It is obvious that the Congress and their supporters do not want any development activity to take place in rural areas. what happens to a farmer with three to five acre who has famine/drought for two years in a row? what one should do with barren lands? what of the farmers want to sell the land to become partners with a rural based industry? how to create jobs for young men and women in rural areas. cities are over flowing and they just can not move in and 90% of farmers are not very rich. they have 1-3 acres of land. let us give the land bill to the states. let the congress and their supporters deny this benefit to states ruled by them. They will repent this.
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. M
        mk
        Jul 26, 2015 at 12:44 pm
        Development is necessary;but in a just manner.I agree to BJP led amendment for diluting consensus provision for aqusition and making land loosers stakeholder.It will�be quite helpful to speedy land aquisition and to benefit of landloosers.But I don't understand why they are trying to remove SIA.It makes a feel of no concern of government once people are displaceddian policies are counted with welfare motives.Keeping SIA intact will only be helpful to understand after effects of displacement and to take further steps to mitigate ill-effects of it.As especially for small land owers such displacement brings big miseries which could be counted under SIA.
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. P
          Palengri
          Jul 25, 2015 at 9:47 pm
          I suggest all the leaders from all the political parties opposing Land Bill, presently under discussion and before the Select Committee should take some time off and read Mr.P.V.Narasimha Rao’s book “THE INSIDER”. They should read chapter 27 in the book where in there is reference to Pandit Nehru writing a letter to all the chef ministers’ asking them to implement the Land Reform as promised in the party manifesto. During his time it was only the Congress Party controlling the governments. Chief minister referred in the book was wondering how to move forward and implement the Land Reform Policy. We are in the same situation as to how to get the Land Bill ped. Probably we require late Mr P.V.Narasimha Rao’s Chanakya brain to find a solution!!!!Palengri
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. R
            Rajesh Dhar
            Jul 25, 2015 at 11:22 pm
            People who are supporting this bill should volunteer to give up their land and homes for development purposes. Particularly people who have congested cities and towns
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments