A day after former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju alleged that former CJI R C Lahoti had granted extension to an additional judge of the Madras High Court who was facing corruption charges, at the instance of the then UPA government, the Congress Monday questioned the timing of his allegation.
With the AIADMK using Katju’s allegation to launch a political attack on the DMK and the Congress, the latter advised restraint.
“We must all and that includes the Congress party and others exercise restraint in matters relating to the affairs of the apex judiciary and most importantly its collegiums,” Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi said.
He, however, drew attention to the fact that the statement has come “roughly 10 or nine years after the alleged event”.
Refusing to elaborate, Singhvi said out of the several persons named in the statement, only one has reacted so far.
- Here’s Why Delhi-NCR Gets Pollution Code On Lines Of Beijing
- PM Modi Is More Interested In TRP Politics Rahul Gandhi At Congress Parliamentary Meet
- Bigg Boss 10 December 1 Review: Priyanka Jagga Succeeds In Her Divide And Rule Strategy
- Kahaani 2 Audience Reaction: Vidya Balan Starrer Thriller Gets Mixed Reviews
- Find Out What PM Modi Said About Demonetisation On LinkedIn
- Row Over West Bengal ”Military Coup” Issue Escalates: Who Said What
- Here’s How Mohammad Kaif Replied To Virender Sehwag’s Birthday Wish On Twitter
- West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s Flight Reportedly Had Low Fuel: Here’s What Happened
- Reliance Jio Welcome Offer Extended Till March 31, JioMoney Launched
- Uri Attackers Came From Pakistan, Establishes Digital Data
- Bigg Boss 10 Nov 30 Episode Review: Captaincy Brings Differences In Manoj Punjabi & Manveer Gurjar
- Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi’s Official Twitter Handle Hacked
- After Rahul Gandhi’s Twitter Handle, Congress Official Twitter Account Hacked
- 3 Dead As Army Helicopter Crashes In Sukna In West Bengal
- BJP, Congress Engage In War Of Words Over Nagrota Attack: Find Out More
“These are matters of confidentiality within the collegium and unless we get the statements and clarifications for the ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ or ‘D’, I don’t think it would be appropriate for me to react on behalf of the Congress party. It is quite clear that unless this version, and it is one version of the events, is corroborated by all the principal actors whose names been taken, prudence and discretion would dictate that we exercise appropriate restraint. We reserve our right but as of now this is our stand,” he said.