Chief Justice of India P Sathasivam Monday said the Supreme Court registry had made a mistake in listing a case before a specific Bench, after senior advocate Dushyant Dave questioned the judicial propriety of that Bench in entertaining the matter relating to allotment of land in Navi Mumbai.
Dave had alleged before the CJI-led Bench that “forum shopping” was becoming a practice in the apex court and that the CJI must pass order on the judicial side to protect the integrity of the institution.
“It is the most shocking incident and it sends an extremely wrong signal from the Supreme Court. Great damage is likely to be caused to the reputation of this institution. Strong message needs to be sent that forum shopping won’t be allowed in this court,” he said.
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
- Hillary Clinton accuses Donald Trump of being Vladimir Putin’s ‘puppet’
- Senior UP Congress Leader Rita Bahuguna Joshi Joins BJP
- Missing JNU Student: VC Gives Ultimatum To Students Over ‘Illegal Confinement’
- US Presidential Debate: Donald Trump Calls Hillary Clinton ‘A Nasty Woman’
- Hasselblad True Zoom Mod Review
- Honor 8 First Look Video
- Apple Watch 2: Review, Price And Features
- Delhi HC Dismisses Kejriwal’s Plea For Stay In Criminal Defamation Case
- Gulzar Shares An Interesting Anecdote Behind The Lyrics of ‘Humne Dekhi Hai’ Song
- Diya Mirza Displays Her Painting Skills At An Art Festival In Mumbai
Senior advocate Harish Salve also supported his views and said that forum shopping must be stopped in the SC.
While assuring Dave that he would look into the matter, Justice Sathasivam pointed out that the case was mentioned before him by another senior counsel, requesting that the matters should be clubbed since they were connected.
“What are we supposed to do when a senior member of the bar like you say matters are connected? We take their words on face value and pass orders. But now we know why some other Chief Justices did not allow mentioning of such matters before them,” said the CJI.
At this, Dave said: “Let me say this with regret. The bar is a party to all this.”
Salve added that someone had clearly given a wrong impression and that the bar should act more responsibly.
Later, speaking to reporters after a public function, Justice Sathasivam said the mistake had been rectified and the case had now been listed before an appropriate Bench.
Earlier, Dave had written a letter to the CJI, questioning an order passed in a matter relating to a multi-crore Navi Mumbai land allotment dispute involving the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO).