The CBI chief and the agency’s director of prosecution (DoP) have locked horns over dropping some crucial fodder scam charges against RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav.
CBI sources said director Ranjit Sinha favours dropping the charges while DoP O P Verma does not agree. The matter is being sent to Attorney General G E Vahanvati for his opinion.
The controversy is related to Lalu’s plea in the special court to set aside proceedings against him in some fodder scam cases on the ground that he has already been prosecuted for the same charges in a different FIR.
The cases relate to illegal withdrawal of money from government treasuries on the basis of fake supply orders.
Lalu has argued that a person tried for a crime and acquitted or convicted cannot be tried again for the same crime.
- Here’s Why Delhi-NCR Gets Pollution Code On Lines Of Beijing
- PM Modi Is More Interested In TRP Politics Rahul Gandhi At Congress Parliamentary Meet
- Bigg Boss 10 December 1 Review: Priyanka Jagga Succeeds In Her Divide And Rule Strategy
- Kahaani 2 Audience Reaction: Vidya Balan Starrer Thriller Gets Mixed Reviews
- Find Out What PM Modi Said About Demonetisation On LinkedIn
- Row Over West Bengal ”Military Coup” Issue Escalates: Who Said What
- Here’s How Mohammad Kaif Replied To Virender Sehwag’s Birthday Wish On Twitter
- West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s Flight Reportedly Had Low Fuel: Here’s What Happened
- Reliance Jio Welcome Offer Extended Till March 31, JioMoney Launched
- Uri Attackers Came From Pakistan, Establishes Digital Data
- Bigg Boss 10 Nov 30 Episode Review: Captaincy Brings Differences In Manoj Punjabi & Manveer Gurjar
- Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi’s Official Twitter Handle Hacked
- After Rahul Gandhi’s Twitter Handle, Congress Official Twitter Account Hacked
- 3 Dead As Army Helicopter Crashes In Sukna In West Bengal
- BJP, Congress Engage In War Of Words Over Nagrota Attack: Find Out More
On February 26, the DoP opined that while some evidence against Lalu was common to all cases, allegations of fraudulent withdrawals, amounts of withdrawal, officers accused of drawing and receiving, among others, were different.
“I am of the view that provisions of Section 300 (1) of CrPC and Article 20 of the constitution of India are not attracted in the present case,” Verma wrote.
Sinha disagreed and wrote that the “views of the branch officers and JD (Joint Director) are not consistent with the observations made” in a criminal appeal by the Jharkhand High Court.
“Thus I disagree…since I do not agree with Director of Prosecution, let the matter be referred to Ld. Solicitor General for his legal opinion…,” Sinha wrote.
The CBI Crime Manual, however, says an issue has to go to the AG in case of a disagreement between the prosecution and the investigation wings.