Boy next door, kid in conflict zone can be hauled to prison as an adult

Why heads of top law schools, activists are red-flagging the new juvenile law.

Written by Abantika Ghosh | New Delhi | Published:May 22, 2015 4:25 am
Child rights, Juvenile justice, juvenile justice law, POSCO, juvenile justice law Parliament, December 2012 Delhi gangrape, POCSO Act , India latest news Will take help of best legal minds to put something into the rules to prevent misuse of law, said Maneka Gandhi.

From a child detainee in a Naxal-hit village to the boy next door, any offender in the age group 16-18 can be tried as an adult and jailed once proposed changes in the juvenile justice law clear Parliament.

Child rights activists, legal eagles and heads of law schools are warning that the stringent Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Bill, 2014 — drafted after the uproar over the December 2012 Delhi gangrape in which one of the accused was a juvenile, it has already cleared Lok Sabha — will legitimise illegal detention of children, allowing police to press criminal charges.

Teenaged children will be in the same bracket as adults being tried for heinous crimes like rape, murder, dacoity, kidnapping, drug trafficking and sedition — the minimum sentence in such cases is seven years in jail. This also goes against the grain of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child which mandates that no person aged under 18 can be tried as an adult.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

A teen boy and a girl “experimenting sexually,” say activists, can also land behind bars because the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act criminalises consensual sex in the age group 16-18. This, even Women and Child Development Minister Maneka Gandhi concedes “may be a legitimate concern”.

“But we cannot condone and overlook real heinous crimes with the bogey that the law may be misused. We will take the help of the best legal minds to put something into the rules to prevent the law from being misused,” she told The Indian Express.

Strengthening suspicions of child rights activists and lawyers, Gandhi told Parliament that one of the first calls she received after assuming office was from police officers asking her to make age-related amendments in the law for juveniles.

She dismissed concerns over the Bill as “unnecessarily alarmist… visualising all policemen as anti-child”.

“The law has ample safeguards. There is provision for a special child welfare police officer and juvenile police unit in every district and active juvenile justice boards. They are presuming everything will only be left to the police. In fact, the Bill takes things out of police hands,” Gandhi said.

Professor R Venkata Rao, vice-chancellor of the National Law School of India University in Bengaluru, disagrees.

“Children recruited into extremist groups are essentially victims and this Bill will legitimise their victimisation by trying them like adults and imprisoning them even though the state failed to protect them from being manipulated by adults,” he said.

“The POCSO Act criminalises consensual sex in the age group16-18 and the Bill, if passed by Rajya Sabha, will potentially send hundreds of young adolescents in love or engaged in normal sexual exploration into the adult criminal justice system, and subsequently into jail. Is this how we want to treat the youth of our country?”

Rao and 10 other vice-chancellors of law universities have signed a statement opposing the move to transfer juvenile offenders to the adult justice system.

The signatories are Professor Gurdip Singh Bahri, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University, Lucknow; Dr Faizan Mustafa, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad; Dr Poonam Saxena, National Law University, Jodhpur; Dr Paramjit S Jaswal, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala; Dr Rose Varghese, National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi; Dr Shrikrishna Deva Rao, National Law University Odisha, Cuttack; Dr Vijender Kumar, National Law University and Judicial Academy Assam, Guwahati; Professor C Raj Kumar, O P Jindal Global University, Sonipat; Professor Manoj Kumar Sinha, Indian Law Institute, New Delhi; and, Professor P Ishwara Bhat, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata.

In their statement, they have quoted reports of the department-related parliamentary standing committee and the Justice J S Verma committee, both not in favour of changing the age of juvenility.

Senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam, who was a member of the Verma committee to suggest amendments to the criminal law for speedy disposal of cases of sexual assault, said the committee in its report was very specific that there was no need to change the definition of juvenility.

“The committee took the view that to treat a person under adult law, a person’s brain should function like that of an adult. Neuroscientific evidence suggests that does not happen before 18. The amendments do not take into account social reality either. Concerns about misuse of POCSO, once the new Act is through, are very legitimate,” Subramaniam said.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    sangeeta
    May 27, 2016 at 3:46 am
    people are misusing this law for blackmailing. One of friends son has been registered in false case. His career will be reined as he broke relationship with girl on her mother's threatening more over every thing has to be proved by Boy family. Girl mother has two date of birth proof in Nagar Nigam but judge is considering the one given in school. Just because of this law most boys are in jail as soon as they are turned 18.
    Reply
    1. A
      Anil Maheshwari
      May 22, 2015 at 10:31 am
      Kudos to the academicians who have also taken up a pertinent social cause. They seem to be a cl apart from their counterparts in most of the universities and degree colleges in the country who "draw full time pay for the part-time jobs", to borrow an apt observation of the noted Urdu critic Ale Ahmed Saroor for decades ago in an article in the now defunct " Young Indian" weekly, edited by Chandra Shekhar.
      Reply
      1. A
        Amar Nath
        May 22, 2015 at 5:01 pm
        The so called child right activists will shout so long as juvenile crimes are perpetrated on others. Once their near and dear ones fall victims of heinous crimes the idealism will just evaporate.
        Reply
        1. B
          B. SRIDHAR
          May 22, 2015 at 11:39 am
          The question should not be who should be treated as adult or juvenile. It is a known fact that guys of age 16 to 18 are quite understandable and even know what is what and cannot be termed as ones who are still in an understanding age. The reason that the UN has said that no one less than 18 years of age need be considered as an adult cannnot be correct always. It should be a question more of understnding what one is doing and its repercussions on him or her and also on the victim. If that is the criteria then childeren who are aged above 16 are quite aware of the consequences of crime committed by them. Almost all of the heinous crimes committed by children of age above 16 are all fully aware of what they were doing. In that case there is no harm in treating them as Adults for the purpose of deciding upon heinous crimes. A standing example is the gang rape of Nirbhaya in which it was the audoloscent who was the fiercest of all agressors! What the government is doing is perfectly correct and it is time that drawing room discussionists shut up and allow the government to go ahead. Why cant the Indian Express under take a survey of the crimes committed and the understanding level of all these accused.
          Reply
          1. M
            Mohan
            May 22, 2015 at 5:53 pm
            Some of the ideas that UN sponsored have become outdated. Today in the age of the internet a sixteen year boy is an adult in many ways -- when they gang-rape some one or throw stones regularly at security personnel during a hartal as they do in J & K etc have to dealt with firmly -- why spend money on trying to reform some engaged in criminal acts when you cannot help many others equally young but well behaved to get food and shelter
            Reply
            1. I
              indian
              May 24, 2015 at 8:20 pm
              Only morons like you would judge a childs action dumb. I pity ur useless brain.Its ok to be a dumb but no need to glorify it moron.
              Reply
              1. I
                indian
                May 22, 2015 at 8:17 pm
                Very unfair. In us a 2 year old pulled a trigger on his mother after finding it in her bag while shopping. So now you will send a 2 year old to jail saying its a heinous crime. Dont commit crime on children just because they cant fight for themselves .
                Reply
                1. S
                  SP
                  May 22, 2015 at 3:49 pm
                  The countries like US and UK have modified laws so that they cover 16 year old for heinous crimes. Do UN conventions apply only to India?
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments