Maharashtra bans beef, 5 years jail, Rs 10,000 fine for possession or sale

The President had signed the Bill and sent it to the Ministry of Home Affairs, which then informed the Maharashtra Governor of the decision.

Written by ZEESHAN SHAIKH | Mumbai | Updated: January 27, 2017 2:58 pm
Beef ban, Beef ban Mumbai, Beef Banned in maharashtra, The slaughter of cows was previously prohibited in the state under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act of 1976.

Beef lovers in Maharashtra will now have to do without the red meat as President Pranab Mukherjee has given his assent to the Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Bill, 1995, nearly 19 years after the Maharashtra Assembly passed the Bill during the BJP-Shiv Sena rule in 1995.

The slaughter of cows was previously prohibited in the state under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act of 1976. However, the passage of the new Act will ban the slaughter of bulls as well as bullocks, which was previously allowed based on a fit-for-slaughter certificate.

READ: States where you can order a beef steak for lunch

WATCH VIDEO | Supreme Court Refuses To Entertain PIL For Issuing Guidelines To Restrict Beef Transport

The new Act will, however, allow slaughter of water buffaloes, which provides carabeef — generally seen as an inferior quality meat that makes up only 25 per cent of the total beef market in the state. Beef traders claim the move will not only render thousands jobless, but will also drive up the cost of other meats in the state.

“Thanks a lot Hon President Sir for the assent on Maharashtra Animal Preservation Bill. Our dream of ban on cow slaughter becomes a reality now,” Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis tweeted.

“This is a historic step, which has cultural as well as economic implications for the state. We had passed this Act when we were in power in 1995 and had sent it for the President’s nod in 1996. Subsequent governments in the state, however, failed to do the needful to get the Bill implemented. We had promised in our manifesto to bring this Bill and we have managed to do it,” BJP MP from Mumbai Kirit Somaiya said.

The President had signed the Bill and sent it to the Ministry of Home Affairs, which then informed the Maharashtra Governor of the decision.

Now, anyone found to be selling beef or in possession of it can be jailed for five years and fined Rs 10,000.

The beef trade in the state is largely controlled by Muslims of the Qureshi caste. “Apart from rendering people jobless, the immediate effect will be the spiralling price of other meats as people will be forced to gravitate to them,” president of the Mumbai Suburban Beef Dealer Association Mohammed Qureshi said.

Beef, generally seen as the poor man’s meat, costs almost a third of mutton. Mumbai alone consumes nearly 90,000 kg of mutton every day, sold through 900 licensed stalls and an equal number of illegal stalls.

Beef traders said they are checking if they can take legal recourse. “We are now holding deliberations to see if we can challenge this in any way. The beef traders have been impacted but it will be the farmers who will be affected the most. Who will care for the old and infirm animals that were earlier sold for meat?” Arif Chowdhury, an office bearer of the All India Jamiatul Quresh, an organisation of beef traders, said.

“A recent government report has stated that there is nearly 61 per cent fodder shortage in the state. By banning the slaughter of old and infirm animals, the government is doing grave injustice to the healthy animals and farmers of Maharashtra,” Rajendra Dhende, a beef trader from Sangli, said.

Right-wing groups and Jain organisations have been asking for shutting down of the abattoirs and beef trade in the state.

Beef traders across Maharashtra were on strike for over a week in February to protest against the alleged harassment being meted out to beef traders. Fadnvais had later assured protection to beef traders after a delegation met him, which led to the strike being called off.

Glyston Gracias, brand chef at Smoke House Deli, Mumbai, said, “This is extremely sad to hear. I will have to go to another country. Most of the dishes at the restaurant are based on European cuisine. A lot of our foreign clientele, such as Japanese and Europeans, will miss beef on the menu. We will also lose out on alcohol sales because beef and beer go really well. I will find it difficult to do international cuisine.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. M
    Mohamed Ameen
    Apr 29, 2017 at 9:40 am
    With the fanatical group called RSS-backed political dispensation at the zenith of its political power a law imposed a comprehensive ban on the slaughter of bulls, bullocks and calves - in addition to cows which had been protected from slaughter since 1976. This speaks volumes about the double standards of the BJP which has deliberately targeted the Muslim community in Maharashtra where the community will suffer business loss on a very large scale. It's a clear vendetta against the Muslim community. The Hindutva people are deliberately targeting us. Is their next agenda to marginalise the Muslim community, which suits their political agenda, The ban is legally and politically flawed. is against the secular sprit of the Indian Cons ution. Governments cannot ban cow slaughter and consumption of beef while citing religious grounds or that it is banned in Hinduism. This is because there is no compulsion to slaughter cow or consume beef on those who consider religious
    Reply
    1. S
      sam
      Mar 4, 2015 at 2:16 pm
      How am i an ? I was just agreeing with you
      Reply
    2. S
      Sad Day
      Mar 3, 2015 at 2:40 pm
      What a wonderful way to undo all the work done to persuade the world that we have arrived. The commercial capital of India goes ahead and bans beef signalling to the world that we cant get over petty 'who eats what issues' however we are ready for the world to Make in India and invest in India. I am ashamed and disappointed with this law. Cant believe that tolerance levels are so low and petty. Cant believe that the President consider that this would be restricting the freedoms of those who chose to eat beef and signal to the world that one of the the leaders of the country is fine with this kind of beliefs. And to top this the Chief Minister tweets like this is some kind of victory Really sad day for India
      Reply
      1. A
        Aliac
        Mar 3, 2015 at 5:09 pm
        I feel that who ever opposes this or has opinions should STFU and eat their words. happens...and its called finding 'another job' . Its oki that I travel to dubai to get my beers and bacon, but you cant even move one bit of your to get some moo ? compensation to ? Greedy s, Clearly, All your heads are up your (s) and they are called 'eyes' and you need to open them, sincerely ... And, please... If you really think beef is so awesome, think of people who think bacon is awesome (in muslim countries) ... And, take away someones bacon and beer they become a terrorist, Not so much with Beef !
        Reply
        1. H
          Hindustani
          Mar 3, 2015 at 5:20 pm
          hey beef lover,,,,, PIG
          Reply
          1. H
            Hindustani
            Mar 3, 2015 at 4:51 pm
            I do not need either beef or pork. I am simply advising the people who are fond of beef and can not eat that because of the new law. Dude, if you are font of that you can try that even. with family and kids.
            Reply
            1. r
              raj5151235
              Mar 3, 2015 at 6:50 pm
              How many potatoes & Onion plants do you kill to save your butt? You are a bigger killer of lives ...mind it.
              Reply
              1. r
                raj5151235
                Mar 3, 2015 at 9:53 am
                Another example of how Governments never seem to do anything right. How can a bunch of politicians decide what the mes should or should not eat. Go anywhere in the world - Beef is accepted by the Pope, Rulers of the world, Presidents, Govt of all countries. This law is unacceptable by world standards & targeting the minority and their rights. This must be challenged in Supreme court....BTW I am a Hindu
                Reply
                1. Load More Comments