Shayara Banu’s fight against triple talaq

Meeting the 35-year-old who recently moved SC seeking a ban on instantaneous triple talaq. She thus becomes the first Muslim woman to challenge a personal law practice, citing her fundamental rights

Written by Shalini Nair | Kashipur | Published: April 24, 2016 12:12 am
triple talaq, triple talaq in islam, triple talaq india, triple talaq case, triple talaq supreme court, supreme court, triple talaq ban india, india news At her parents’ home in Kashipur. Shayara hasn’t met her two children since she left Allahabad last April. (Express Photo by Ravi Kanojia)

The photograph of the bride in her wedding finery, her kohl-rimmed hazel eyes peering into the camera, bears little resemblance to Shayara Banu of today. The wedding album titled ‘Romantic Moments’ also features photographs of a two-wheeler, household furniture, utensils and jewellery that were given away at the time of the wedding.

Next to the album is a polythene bag with medicines for the “infections” Banu claims to have caught from multiple abortions and a heavy dose of anti-depressants. For the last 15 years of her marriage, she says, her greatest dread has been the word talaq being uttered thrice by her husband Rizwan Ahmed. Last year in October, while she was at her parents’ home in Uttarakhand’s Kashipur district, her fears came true: Rizwan sent her the talaq-nama from Allahabad.

On the advice of her family, the 35-year-old is using her case as a plank to challenge the triad of instantaneous triple talaq (talaq-e-bidat), polygamy and halala (a practice where divorced women, in case they want to go back to their husbands, have to consummate a second marriage). Her petition in the Supreme Court makes no mention of the contentious Uniform Civil Code, neither does it ask for codification of the Muslim personal law. She has sought equality before law and protection against discrimination on the basis of her gender and religion.

“Soon after the wedding, they started demanding a four-wheeler and more money. But that wasn’t the only problem. From the very beginning, my husband would threaten to give me talaq each time he found some fault with me. For the first two years of marriage, when I didn’t bear a child, my mother-in-law would egg him on to divorce me,” says Shayara, who is today mother to a 14-year-old boy and a 12-year-old girl, both of whom are away from her, in her husband’s custody.

Shayara says that a year after her marriage to Rizwan, a property dealer based in Allahabad, UP, she wasn’t allowed to attend her sister’s wedding in the same city. In the last 14 years, she says, she wasn’t allowed to visit her sister, who lives within a half-hour distance from her house in Allahabad.

She lost count of the number of abortions she was forced to undergo by Rizwan. “Six or seven times maybe. I would often plead with him to allow me to undergo tubectomy, but he wouldn’t relent,” she says.

Her mother Feroza Begum says the emotional and physical battering turned Shayara into a bundle of nerves. Until last year, she says, her daughter never uttered a word about her agony, not even about how he allegedly tried to throttle her once. “Dimaag kharab ho gaya tha Shayara ka tension le le kar. Yahan aakar hamne ilaaj karaya (Shayara had lost her mind with all that stress. We got her treated after she came here),” says Feroza.

Last year in April, when her condition deteriorated, Shayara says Rizwan asked her to pack a small bag and asked her father to meet them half-way in Moradabad, from where he could take her home. She was told that she could return once she recovered entirely. “As I regained my health slowly, I would call him and ask him to come take me back but he didn’t want me to come and wouldn’t let me speak with my children either,” she says. She waited restlessly for six months, and it was then that the talaq-nama came.

Rizwan denies having ever beaten Shayara, though he admits to keeping her away from her relatives as he “didn’t want anything to do with them”. He also admits to the multiple abortions. Vasectomy and tubectomy, he says, are considered to be “bahut haram”. “I have given her talaq the way Shariat and Hadith allow me to. I cannot take her back now, it will be against the Shariat. It is not good to go against what the religion has prescribed,” says Rizwan over the phone from Allahabad.


For over three decades now, the tiny Army quarter at the cantonment of RTSD-Hempur (Remount Training School and Depot) in Kashipur tehsil has been home to Iqbal, an accountant in the Army, and his family: wife, three daughters, son, daughter-in-law and two grandchildren. Today, in this cantonment, his daughter Shayara is insulated from censure that would otherwise have come her way for taking on the practices in her community. “I grew up in Allahabad where I have seen women around me being subjected to this, but they were all too poor to go to court. When my daughter fell in the same trap, I decided it was time to do something,” he says.

The family first met Supreme Court advocate Balaji Srinivasan for inter-state transfer of a case filed by Rizwan at the Allahabad family court. “In the meantime, her husband sent her the talaq-nama by post, which then became the basis of her writ petition,” says Srinivasan.

In her petition, she has challenged ‘instantaneous triple talaq’ and not triple talaq itself, which is allowed by the Quran as long as the three utterances are spread over 90 days. There have been PILs filed by NGOs and individuals in the Supreme Court but, he says, those didn’t stand as they weren’t filed by an affected party or because they pleaded that Uniform Civil Code be introduced. Shayara’s is the first such case where a Muslim woman has challenged a personal practice citing fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.


Outside the Army cantonment, Shayara’s case is yet to make news in the rest of Kashipur. The religious heads of the small town got wind of the case only recently after local newspapers approached them for their views on the matter.

About 14 km away from her house lives 65-year-old Ataur Rehman, the imam of the town for 25 years before he retired two years ago. Scattered across his room, that doubles up as a unani clinic, are vials of pills and medicines. Having just gotten off the Persian rug on which he takes his afternoon siesta, before his next batch of patients start streaming in, Rehman is still heavy-eyed. But in a resounding voice, he explains that the courts or the State have no business interfering in religious matters.

He says that the recommended way of giving talaq is for a Muslim man to utter it once, give the woman some time to mend her ways, utter it again, give her some more time, before making the third and final utterance. “However, even if it is uttered thrice in one go, it is valid. Kami auraton ki bhi hoti hai. Bina wajah koi aadmi talaq nahi deta (Women are also at fault. No man gives talaq without a reason),” he says.

The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, allows Indian Muslims to be governed by the Shariat. The absence of codification has legally allowed community leaders to hold the practices as sacrosanct. The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, however, codifies a woman’s right to seek divorce by approaching the court.

Rehman believes that a woman’s right to khula only allows her to plead with her husband for divorce and doesn’t actually give her the right to divorce her husband. “I don’t care what the Act says, but if the woman is given the right to talaq, she won’t live with her man even for six months, she will leave. Women can’t have the right to give talaq, it’s without doubt a man’s prerogative.”

Polygamy, Rehman says, is allowed as long as the man can take care of all four wives equally and halala is required as it will ensure that the man “thinks twice before divorcing his wife”.


A post-graduate in sociology, Shayara, the eldest of four siblings, is the most educated in the family. “Mujhe samaj ke bare mein seekhna tha (I wanted to learn about society),” she says. Her ambition was to teach, which she did very briefly for a few months before she got married.

If the court rules in her favour, holding triple talaq to be null and void, she will be faced with taking a call on whether she wants to go back to Allahabad. “I might go back, for the sake of my children, that is, if he shows an inclination to change,” she says.

Her family, however, is more determined. Their objection is to the manner in which her husband divorced her and not to the divorce itself. Her mother says that if the apex court holds her triple talaq to be invalid, they will approach the court to seek divorce through the legal route. Her father says, “A person who has brought her to this state, kept her like a prisoner all these years, why go back to him? But I always leave it to my children to take the final call.”

On her part, Shayara’s low-pitched voice wavers throughout as she talks about her past or her uncertain future. The only time it takes on a resolute tone is when she talks about the present. “Shah Bano got a ruling in her favour from the Supreme Court but it was later overturned by the government, denying divorced Muslim women their right to maintenance. Had her case been a success, it would have been one battle less for us,” says Shayara.


* Thirty-ONE years after the SC urged the government in the Shah Bano case to frame a uniform civil code, a two-judge bench in October 2015 suo motu ordered registration of a PIL.

* Justices Anil R Dave and Adarsh K Goel sought responses from the Attorney General and the National Legal Services Authority of India on whether “gender discrimination” suffered by Muslim women should not be considered a violation of fundamental rights.

* The bench was hearing a matter related to succession when it said it is time to focus on rights of Muslim women. The judges asked for the case to be placed before the CJI to constitute a bench. It is now being heard with Shayara Bano case.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. K
    Apr 23, 2017 at 3:52 pm
    I'm challenging everyone who has being trying to get help, but have been unsuccessful. GANESH SPELL TEMPLE can help you with solutions to the following problems: To bring back your partner/ spouse who has left you for somebody else. Stop your partner/ spouse from cheating & remain faithful to you only. The man/women of your dreams keeps escaping you Success in exams and with job interviews If your been fired and want your boss to ask you to return, regardless of what transpired. Luck in money matters or for very serious court cases. Reunite/Bind broken families. Urgent Death Spell 100 GUARANTEED IN JUST TWO DAYS RESULT at (ganeshspelltemple@gmail ) May Lord Ganesha bless all Your Endeavours with Success on this day. Email: ganeshspelltemple@gmail
    1. M
      Apr 24, 2016 at 4:33 am
      Solution is simple! Just don't encourage to marry those who don't treat you well. Teach your daughters to do the right thing! Just do it for 10 years see how they will be begging to change the rules of the games!
      1. Amit Kumar
        Oct 15, 2016 at 2:16 am
        This lady shaira bano claimed that she was a sufferer in a marriage of 15 years.It means a marriage which was not working in a long period of 15 years then how does it matter if talaque is given at once or in a period of 3 months.This lady is not living with her husband from a long period of time,it means life of two persons along with children is spoiling,then wats wrong in a divorce which allow two persons free to live their life. Now a days lots of false 498 cases registered against husband to exploit not only husband but also their old parents and other family members� and even supreme court declared these type of cases as legal terrorism.Many men had done suicide in these cases and husband will got divorce only after being proven innocent .These cases run for a period of 8 - 10 years .This way the marriage life of two people spoiled and our law even don't allow them to divorce and live happily.And there are thousands of 498a cases running in court.If two people are incompatible then why our law forcing them to live together and spoiled each other life. Two persons� marry only if both of them is ready to live together.But if any one of them don't want to continue the marriage then that person should have the right too come out of the marriage instead of spoiling their life in false cases for long years. If a person marries with the other person its a mutual understanding and not the mercy to the other person� in the same way if one person divorced the other for not being happy with the marriage then this is not� a cruelty.
        1. Mohammad Bin Tughlaq
          Apr 24, 2016 at 10:37 am
          As long as government amend the consution that some restrictions are made in the freedom given to minority religion not only Supreme Court even God Almighty cannot do anything in this matter. Our great ancestors in their wisdom has made the consution bestowing on them all sorts of unwanted freedom. In fact the freedom given should have been restricted to their dealing with God only and not with an individual. If they want to pray God standing on their head. But on someone's head. Let them shout 'Allahu Akbar' at the top of their voice at midnight. But it should not disturb their neighbour. Whatever they do in the name of religion should not affect another individual whether from their own religion or from another religion. Irrespective of one's religion he or she should have every right as a citizen of India. All laws civil and criminal should apply to each and every individual. Right of a citizen is supreme and right and obligation as a follower of a religion come next to that;br/gt;It is a pity that more and more Muslim women are not coming in the open and demand to change this obscurantist practices. Now there are many educated women in that community and why they don't demand it like this brave woman. This has nothing to do with religion and is just a practice. And see how horribly they treat. From the words of that Imam of Kashipur one can understand the way they treat the woman. They look at her as if she is always at fault and husband is right. It says the woman has to mend her ways. What a obscurantist outlook!!! Why women's right activists are not coming out to get this most cruel law removed from practice?lt;br/gt;And our great former prime minister. Why did he push the poor Muslim woman into this dungeon to suffer? Where are Trupti Desai and others. Why don't you do something in this matter instead of entering temples? If you believe in God you can pray anywhere. And actual prayer is by helping the needy. Not standing in front of a piece of rock with hands folded and chanting some words of praise to the unseen God.
          1. Mohammad Bin Tughlaq
            Apr 24, 2016 at 11:15 am
            Please read' government DO NOT amend'. There has to be some restrictions on the freedom given to minorities to practice their religion.
            1. Load More Comments