Putting an end to the controversy over differential pricing on the Internet, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) on Monday ruled that differential pricing for data services will not be allowed in the country.
“No service provider shall offer or charge discriminatory tariffs for data services on the basis of content,” the telecom regulator said in its Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, which will come into effect immediately.
Differential pricing means charging of different tariffs by a service provider for data services based on the content accessed, transmitted or received by the consumer.
- Twitter War Between Congress Leader Amarinder Singh & Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal
- Life Of Actor-Dancer Ashwini Ekbote Who Died During A Performance
- Idea Exchange With Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh
- PM Narendra Modi Bats For Equal Rights : Here What He Said On Triple Talaq
- Uncle Shivpal Targets Akhilesh, Claims CM Told Him He Will Form Another Party
- Pakistan Continues To Violate Ceasefire In RS Pura
- Samajwadi Party’s internal fight divides SP
- Cyrus Mistry Removed As Chairman of Tata Sons: Here’s What Happened
- Wreath Laying Ceremony Of Slain Soldier Sushil Kumar Observed
- Virat Kohli Powers India Home With Unbeaten 154
- Pakistan Resorts To Heavy Mortar Shelling, 1 BSF Jawan Dead, 3 Injured
- Bigg Boss 10 Weekend Ka Vaar: Priyanka Jagga Evicted
- Here’s How Much Army Welfare Fund Has After MNS Demanded Rs 5 Cr To Cast Pak Artistes
- Shiv Sena Chief Uddhav Thackeray Take A Jibe At MNS: Here’s What He Said
- Samajwadi Party Crisis Deepens: Here’s How It Will Impact UP Polls
- TRAI expects to finalise its view on Net Neutrality in a 'couple of months'
- TRAI's differential pricing verdict and what it means for Net Neutrality
- TRAI Slams Differential Pricing For Internet Services: What It Means
- TRAI supports Net Neutrality: Key points from the differential data-pricing order
- TRAI supports Net Neutrality; slams differential pricing: Here's everything you need to know
- TRAI floats new Consulation paper, lists disadvantages of zero-rating plans
The regulator has also set a penalty of Rs 50,000 for each day of contravention, subject to a maximum of Rs 50 lakh. Under the Trai Act, though, the penalty for contravention can attract a fine of up to Rs 2 lakh for each day during the period of default.
MUST-READ: Key points from the TRAI order
“Anything on the Internet cannot be differently priced… this (Trai’s order) would disallow any project which works on the principle of differential pricing,” Trai chairman R S Sharma told reporters.
The regulator, however, added that a service provider may offer data services at reduced tariff, when differential data pricing might become unavoidable, especially at times of “grave public emergency”, provided such tariff shall be reported to the regulator within seven working days from the date of implementation of the reduced tariff.
Trai said it would review its policy on differential pricing every two years. Trai also gave service providers six months to comply with the new rules.
“No plan, pack or voucher already subscribed by a pre-paid or post-paid consumer providing differential data tariff based on content, shall be in operation beyond a period of six months from the date of these regulations coming into effect,” it said.
Facebook’s Free Basics plan, launched in some three dozen developing countries, offers pared-down web services on mobile phones, along with access to Facebook’s own social network and messaging services, without charge. The US-based company had promoted its Free Basics campaign through massive advertisements and even asked its users to support Free Basics by writing via email to Trai. Earlier, Trai had asked Reliance Communications, Facebook’s distributor of Free Basics in India, not to offer the product on a commercial basis in the country.
Airtel had also attempted to launch Airtel Zero in April 2015, but had then put its plan on the backburner.
Proponents of net neutrality had demanded Internet service providers to give equal access to all content and applications without favouring, blocking or slowing down of any particular application or website.
During its consultation process, the regulator had asked stakeholders whether telecom service providers should be allowed to have differential pricing for different websites and applications. Trai had received 24,00,000 comments, of which over 14,00,000 were in favour of Facebook’s Free Basics platform. But the regulator had said a majority of views lacked clarity and were of no use.
Facebook expressed its disappointment over the regulations, saying, “Our goal with Free Basics is to bring more people online with an open, non-exclusive and free platform. While disappointed with the outcome, we will continue our efforts to eliminate barriers and give the unconnected an easier path to the Internet and the opportunities it brings.”
Hemant Joshi, Partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP, said, “Differential pricing for different level of services is a well-accepted principle across all industries, from energy, railways, airlines, buses, highways (tolls), etc. The concept of differential pricing inherently recognises the economic principle of paying differently for different levels of service and experience. In the telecom sector, there are virtual highways that need to follow the same principle. EU is considering allowing ‘specialised services’ with few priority services having fast lane internet connection.”