The Madras High Court Tuesday admitted an appeal filed by State Election Commission (SEC) against the order of a single judge who set aside the notification for the local body elections in Tamil Nadu.
A division bench also ordered issue of notices to the state Government and DMK on the matter returnable by four weeks.
The High Court had on October four declared the notification for civic polls in the state, scheduled for October 17 and 19, as null and void, holding that it violated the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Election Rules.
- Varun Gandhi Under Attack Over Defence Deals: Here’s How
- This Diwali, Let Blind Students Brighten Up your Homes With Candles & Diyas
- CBI Files Supplementary Chargesheet In Sheena Bora Murder Case
- Soha Ali Khan And Vir Das Starrer 31st October Audience Reaction
- Sahara Chief Subrata Roy’s Parole Extended Till November 28
- Simple Tips To Secure Your Debit Card From Fraudsters
- New Zealand & India Team Being Welcomed In Chandigarh
- Mumbai Call Centre Scam: All You Need To Know
- Jammu Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti Appeals To Police: Here’s What She Said
- Shocker From Ahmedabad: Find Out What Happened
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
It had also directed authorities to issue a fresh notification for holding the election and complete the process by December 31, on a petition by DMK.
In his petition, DMK leader and Rajya Sabha member RS Barathy had contended that rules were not followed and mandatory reservation for Scheduled Tribes was not provided in the civic posts.
Challenging the Single Judge’s order the SEC’s had filed an appeal.
In its appeal the Commission submitted that the order of setting aside the September 26th notification issued for civic Polls had resulted in grave miscarriage of justice.
It was also submitted that the Single Judge had failed to see that once election notification is published, the entire state machinery can be requisitioned by the Election Commission for election-related work.
“Therefore, it is not desirable to prolong the period as it may result in administrative inconvenience. The observation of the judge that the SEC had acted with unwarranted hurry is not justified in the facts of the case”, the SEC submitted.
Elections have to be held within a stipulated time as it was imperative that new body must take office by the end of October 2016. The judge also erred in stating that the ruling party had advance information regarding the polls.
The observation may not be justified in the facts of this case, it was submitted.
he judge in any event failed to see that the so-called contravention of Rule 24/25 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Rules may not amount to illegalities. Also, at the best, it can only be an irregularity which will not justify stopping of election after the election notification had been issued.