Parliament may consider harsher punishment for child abuse, says SC

The apex court also said that the Parliament may reconsider the definition of 'child' in the Indian Penal Code with context to rape.

Written by Utkarsh Anand | New Delhi | Updated: January 12, 2016 2:21 am
supreme court, child rape, child rape laws, child rape punishment, rape punishment, child rape convicts, rape laws india, ipc reforms, india news The Supreme Court was responding to an appeal for castration for convicts in child abuse.

Expressing “deep anguish” at the rise in sexual assault crimes against children, the Supreme Court Monday urged Parliament to consider more “rigorous” punishments for such offenders and bring about changes in law to treat rape cases against children as a specific offence.

“Parliament may think of specifically defining ‘child’ in the Indian Penal Code with context to rape and prescribe further rigorous punishment for child rape,” said the court. At present, ‘child’ is defined in the IPC as any person below the age of 18 and there is no classification between children as young as two years and other minors in the context of rape.

Hearing a PIL which sought introduction of castration as a punitive measure, a bench of Justices Dipak Misra and N V Ramana said India cannot have as its model South Korea or any other country where castration is one of the punishments in child abuse cases.

“South Korea is not our idol. Creating offences and introducing punishments are in the realm of legislation. How can a court ask Parliament to introduce a particular punishment in the statute? It is up to Parliament to consider such issues. If Parliament wants to do it, let them do it,” said the court as it heard senior advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani for the PIL petitioner.

Representing the Supreme Court Women Lawyers’ Association, Pavani argued that the law is ineffective in addressing the menace and,requested the top court to nudge lawmakers for bringing in castration as a punishment in cases of rape of children.

She relied on a recent Madras High Court judgment, asking the government to consider castration as an additional form of punishment for child abusers. The high court had said, “though the suggestion of castration looks barbaric, barbaric crimes should definitely attract barbaric models of punishment” and that it would fetch “magical” results in preventing child abuse.

But the bench told Pavani that the high court’s order appeared to be outside the jurisdiction of a court and wondered whether it could survive if challenged in the apex court. “One judge of a high court has said it. It is not as if Supreme Court has given a judgment,” it added.

However, as Pavani insisted upon inquiring about a view of the government, the bench sought Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi’s assistance. The AG categorically said that no civilised society can tolerate rape of children. But he added that providing for punishments for offences are in Parliament’s wisdom and that courts should not suggest any particular punishment.

Accepting the AG’s views, the bench said it is not going to introduce any specific punishment in the IPC and that Parliament may consider stricter punishment for sexual abuse of children if it deems right.

 

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    Sirius
    Jan 11, 2016 at 10:59 am
    SC should first discipline the HC's in what it believes, else this observation has no value . Delhi HC, in 2015, allowed a middle aged man , convicted for raping and murdering a child (who was also his neighbor) to be considered for 'reform', based on the recommendation of an 'expert' committee ....
    Reply
    1. S
      Sirius
      Jan 12, 2016 at 3:41 am
      I disagree !
      Reply
      1. P
        Paul
        Jan 11, 2016 at 9:55 pm
        "Rapist " should tattooed on their forehead in addition to other punishments.
        Reply
        1. S
          S.Gonesh
          Jan 11, 2016 at 10:34 am
          Killings, rapings of girls and women must be stopped, if needed forcefully. There are no reasons for such acts. The Government must take firm steps.
          Reply
          1. A
            ASHOK KUMAR
            Jan 11, 2016 at 2:52 pm
            Modi should learn something from Indian judiciary. He should not rely on Jaitley , man of 700 crores having no interest in common man,s welfare.
            Reply
            1. R
              Raj
              Jan 12, 2016 at 9:45 am
              First thing that should be done is publicize the child abusers - by putting their names, their pictures and their details in police and public databases. They must be forced to report to police station every 6 months and must not be allowed to rent, buy or sell property or live in any locality without informing the police first and getting permission. Next, these people should be given rigorous imprisonment for life terms or solitary confinement for life . Effective tracking, identification and publicizing these child abusers will automatically be a grave punishment .
              Reply
              1. R
                Raj
                Jan 12, 2016 at 9:41 am
                Yes because hi family worth lakhs of crores has been so interested in "common mans" welfare right ? Jaitley is a Supreme Court lawyer - these judges are unelected and unaccountable people - they can talk whatever they want - just like TV studio pundits - but being elected representatives means following laws and rules and answering the public every 5 years.
                Reply
                1. J
                  jai
                  Jan 11, 2016 at 6:23 pm
                  why is the attorney general opposing castration? is he scared that his family and friends might get caught up? or some of the bjp members and opposition might get their balls chopped off?
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments