SC slams Centre for not supplying food grain to drought-hit states

Taking a dim view of the postcard approach of the central government, Justice Lokur said, "The moment we ask you questions, it is constructed as if we are attacking government of India."

By: IANS | New Delhi | Published:October 5, 2016 4:12 pm
supreme court, Justice Madan B. Lokur, N.V. Ramana, National Food Security Act, drought affected areas in India, India news, Indian Express Supreme Court. (File Photo)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday slammed the Centre for doing nothing to comply with its directions to supply food grain to the drought-affected areas under the National Food Security Act.

The bench of Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice N.V. Ramana said, “We will discharge the Union of India (as respondents from the case), if it is not able to do anything.”

Watch what else is making news

The apex court also asked the PIL petitioner organisation, Swaraj Abhiyan, to file an affidavit flagging five or six direction that have not been complied with by the drought-hit states for initiation of contempt.

Taking a dim view of the postcard approach of the central government, Justice Lokur said, “The moment we ask you questions, it is constructed as if we are attacking government of India.”

As Additional Solicitor General P.S. Narasimha sought to play down the issue, Justice Lokur observed, “An Act of the Parliament (the National Food Security Act) is being violated with impunity, is not a small issue.”

The bench said this while asking ASG Narasimha to explain what he had said in the affidavit.

Clearly exasperated over the way things were happening with states not complying with its orders and the Centre telling the court that it had sent them a communication, Justice Ramana said, “If this is the way the matter is going on, there is no need to hear it. We are wasting your time.”

“An Act (the National Food Security Act) passed by the Parliament has to be followed by the states. Let them say they don’t bother about the Act,” Justice Lokur said, asking ASG Narasimha: “Is there a remedy under the Constitution, if states don’t comply with the laws passed by the Parliament.”

The strong observation from the bench came in the course of the hearing on the compliance of several directions issued by the apex court in its judgment on a PIL by Swaraj Abhiyan. The organisation had sought the court’s intervention for relief to the poor people in drought-affected states, including Gujarat, Bihar and Haryana.

Gujarat, Bihar and Haryana have resisted the suggestion that they declare some of their districts as drought-affected.

Pointing to the inaction by the states and the Centre, Justice Ramana said, “We are not getting any feel or visible change except funds have been released. The mechanism has failed. The Acts of Parliament and directions of the (top) court are not being implemented.”

“Is it possible to monitor the 13 odd states from here,” Justice Ramana asked as ASG Narasimha urged the court to monitor the implementation of its directions.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. S
    shailendra
    Oct 5, 2016 at 3:01 pm
    The Supreme Court is anti-national for daring to question the Govt of India.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;from the article - lt;br/gt;"Gujarat, Bihar and Haryana have resisted the suggestion that they declare some of their districts as drought-affected."lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Why are these states resisting efforts to declare districts as drought-affected and not allowing supply of food-grains ?
    Reply
    1. B
      Balasubramanya
      Oct 5, 2016 at 11:36 am
      Court is acting like a modern day Robin Hood fixing each and every problems with in a blink of eyes. Keep it up.
      Reply
      1. A
        ashwin
        Oct 5, 2016 at 11:07 am
        Modi saheb ..busy in making publicity posters of sugical strikes as if he were sitting on the chopper n hit the enemy.....he never ever care for poor ..saftey .....corruption...he proved a week pm and just a nautanki doll ..he can't even get back mallya ...lol ...batien aisa haat hila hilakar karte hai ki bas mai duniya bhar tour loonga ..poster boy banunga
        Reply
        1. S
          shekhar
          Oct 5, 2016 at 11:13 am
          Why SC is getting in subject that is not belong to them. IS we are living political justice system (socialist). Why they are not clearning backlog cases? They have duty to give justice to those cases six month or less !!!
          Reply
          1. G
            Gopal
            Oct 5, 2016 at 10:30 pm
            Notice, once more, a PIL is used by the Supreme Court to interfere in governance.
            Reply
            1. V
              Vishal Kumar Yadav
              Oct 6, 2016 at 4:46 pm
              Modi will do surgical strikes against the starving
              Reply
              1. J
                Joseph R Stephen
                Oct 5, 2016 at 6:54 pm
                Modi will do surgical strikes against the starving
                Reply
                1. V
                  Vihari Naidu
                  Oct 5, 2016 at 5:39 pm
                  Center busy doling out concessions and tax breaks to corporates. Who remembers the poor people....?!
                  Reply
                  1. R
                    Ramyagnesh
                    Oct 5, 2016 at 1:20 pm
                    Agreed, the Law ped by the Parliament of India need to be enforced. The honourable Supreme Court should recall what happened few days back. It did not do anything when Karnataka Government refused to comply with the Order of the Supreme Court repeatedly. Take the case of NJAC bill which was also ped by the Parliament but the Honourable Supreme Court refused to accept it and did not abide by the Law enacted by the Parliament.lt;br/gt;Why this double / triple standards Honourable Supreme Court?
                    Reply
                    1. A
                      anon
                      Oct 5, 2016 at 4:42 pm
                      Let fekuji plane land in india...fekuji will fix everything...fekuji is airborne all the time...cannot see what's happening..
                      Reply
                      1. A
                        anon
                        Oct 5, 2016 at 4:48 pm
                        This is fekuji's model of development..if any corporate house needs loans fekuji will stand as guarantor...modiji is so much in love with the poor adanis and ambanis..very soon he is going to hand over ONGC HP, BP, HAL, ETC ETC.... to his poor corporate Friends
                        Reply
                        1. M
                          Mohan Krishnaswamy
                          Oct 5, 2016 at 12:53 pm
                          it is MOBOCRACY ALL THE WAY NOT DEMOCRACY India is dead. long live India.
                          Reply
                          1. M
                            Mohan Krishnaswamy
                            Oct 5, 2016 at 12:49 pm
                            what about the govt.? if tyou do not want courts. abolish them, so that any one can do anything as one wishes. India is dead. long live India.
                            Reply
                            1. M
                              Mohan Krishnaswamy
                              Oct 5, 2016 at 12:50 pm
                              what about the govts failure in all fields.? if tyou do not want courts. abolish them, so that any one can do anything as one wishes. India is dead. long live India.
                              Reply
                              1. S
                                Suresh Hattangadi
                                Oct 5, 2016 at 11:22 pm
                                You are wrong and as usual support a wrong committed.If it was an order what was the outcome? Was there any visible action by the Govt? Show us reports of the action of the Govt. if it was an order complied with. Supporting indefensible has become order of the day.The same is case with SC calling present Govt. as 'Kumbhakarna'.What about it? It is persons like you who ignore signs of partiality and become satisfied which is the bane of democracy.
                                Reply
                                1. S
                                  Suresh Hattangadi
                                  Oct 5, 2016 at 3:36 pm
                                  I am reminded of UPA Govt.'s and SC's exchange when a similar question of food grains distribution to poor people 'free' arose.UPA Govt. with the then Minister of Agriculture, Mr. Sharad Pawar flatly refused to give 'free' food grains to poor people who could not by the food grain giving some economic reason and instead preferred it to rot.SC then meekly accepted the reason and did not pursue the matter. Now with this Govt. SC is getting very strict and slamming the Govt.Though media may not refer to that instance we, common persons, know the difference and wonder whether SC is playing favourites with some and antagonistic with others.The same was the case with cleaning of Ganga river.UPA ( Congress) which was in power for decades did not make any visible change or effort to cleaning of Ganga but the moment this Govt. came into power its atude and language changed.It called the present Govt. which was not even one year old called it 'Kumbhakarna' for 'sleeping' on cleaning of Ganga whereas the Govt had taken it on a war footing.SC unfortunately is taking a political view of things and taking sides when it is expected to be impartial and only base its comments on 'evidence' which SC itself often cites.SC's this changed atude is not gone unnoticed.
                                  Reply
                                  1. V
                                    VIVEK
                                    Oct 5, 2016 at 3:03 pm
                                    FROM THE ARTICLE:lt;br/gt;"Gujarat, Bihar and Haryana have resisted the suggestion that they declare some of their districts as drought-affected.lt;br/gt;Pointing to the inaction by the states and the Centre, Justice Ramana said, “We are not getting any feel or visible change except funds have been released. The mechanism has failed. The Acts of Parliament and directions of the (top) court are not being implemented.”lt;br/gt;The Court need to punish the CM and the Chief Secretary of these states without much delay.
                                    Reply
                                    1. Load More Comments