Salman verdict: The witness who stood by his statement till his death

Sessions court had taken Ravindra Patil’s evidence on record while convicting Salman Khan earlier this year; HC called him not a ‘wholly reliable witness’.

Written by Mohamed Thaver | Mumbai | Updated: December 11, 2015 7:20 am
salman khan, salman khan verdict, salman hit and run case, salman 2002 case, salman khan news, india news, mumbai news, maharashtra news Patil (left) was assigned as Khan’s bodyguard on September 27, 2002, as the actor reportedly faced threat from the underworld. He died on October 3, 2007, after contracting tuberculosis, before the sessions court trial in the case began in 2008. (Express Archive)

He was the prosecution’s star witness and the only person who stood by his statement that Salman Khan was drunk and was driving the vehicle at the time of the accident on September 28, 2002.

In May, the sessions court took his evidence on record while convicting the actor. On Thursday, the Bombay High Court said Patil was not a “wholly reliable witness”, and his version needed to be corroborated with that of other witnesses.

The case saw 27 prosecution witnesses and one defence witness.

Patil, attached to the Local Arms II unit of the Mumbai Police, was assigned as Khan’s bodyguard on September 27, 2002, as the actor reportedly faced threat from the underworld. According to Patil’s statement, he was seated in the front, next to the driver, in the Land Cruiser. “They (Salman Khan and Kamaal Khan) came outside the (J W Marriot) hotel at about 2:15 am. Salman sat… (behind) the steering (wheel)… I sat near the driver’s seat. I asked the accused whether he would drive the car,” Patil said in his statement.

Stating that the actor ignored his question, Patil said Kamaal Khan was sitting behind the driver’s seat. “He (Salman Khan) was drunk and was driving… at the speed of 90 to 100 kilometres per hour. Before coming to the junction of Hill Road, I told Salman to lower the speed,” said Patil.

Stating that the actor ignored him, he said: “He could not control his motor car while taking the right turn and it went on the footpath. The people were sleeping on the footpath. The motor car ran over (them).” According to Patil’s statement, the vehicle “climbed three stairs” and hit the shutter of “the shop” nearby. “The motor car broke the shutter and went inside about three-and-a-half feet,” he said.

Patil’s examination before a magistrate was completed on March 16, 2006. After the testimony of 16 more witnesses, the case was sent to a sessions court as the charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder was applied. Patil died on October 3, 2007, after contracting tuberculosis, before the sessions court trial began in 2008. The sessions court invoked Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act to take Patil’s testimony before the magistrate court on record.

The high court, however, observed on Thursday that when Patil gave evidence in the magistrate court, where the trial was first carried out, the actor was charged with causing death due to negligence. After the charge was amended to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, Patil could not be cross- examined.

The court said Patil’s evidence “cannot be considered” as there was “erroneous application” of Section 33 of Evidence Act (relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, the truth of facts therein stated) by the trial court.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. B
    Bhola Nath
    Jul 27, 2016 at 9:53 pm
    If Salman committed both crime then he will get punishment surely and he should accept it as per law of karma and if he has not done anything and is innocent then nobody can punish him.
    Reply
    1. H
      Hitite
      Dec 11, 2015 at 5:00 am
      So why nobody helped Patil? That includes me? Because we are insensitive? Shame on us.
      Reply
      1. K
        Kuki
        Dec 11, 2015 at 8:54 am
        RIP ..... GOD OF BHAGVA GITA
        Reply
        1. P
          Prabhakaran Pappalil
          Dec 11, 2015 at 5:04 am
          Justice dela and justice denied to the victims! However, the dictum stands "Nobody is above law".
          Reply
          1. F
            Fools
            Dec 11, 2015 at 5:02 am
            India was doomed when the BCH was ruling for 10 years. India is more doomed now.
            Reply
            1. V
              Vijay
              Dec 11, 2015 at 4:07 am
              God bless Ravindra Patil. He had more character and was more honest to his conscience than joshi and salman combined. Shame on joshi and salman.
              Reply
              1. A
                ams
                Dec 11, 2015 at 8:54 pm
                Bravo Ravindra Patil. You will be a hero. Unfortunately "we" as in Indian society has failed you. We hang our heads in shame :(
                Reply
                1. A
                  atish
                  Dec 11, 2015 at 5:06 am
                  Its really very disturbing for Patil's family. Now they have to live with a "Daag" of "Ir-reliable" policeman. All Policemen should learn a lesson that PPl whom u r giving security they r just using u and will not care if u dead or alive.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments