2000 Red Fort attack: SC allows open court hearing for death-row convict Mohd Arif

Three people, including two Army jawans, were killed in the December 22, 2000 Red Fort attack

By: Express News Service | New Delhi | Updated: January 20, 2016 3:07 am
Security personnel at the Red Fort in New Delhi on Monday. (EXPRESS PHOTO BY Amit Mehra/27 July 2015) Security personnel at the Red Fort in New Delhi on Monday. (EXPRESS PHOTO BY Amit Mehra/27 July 2015)

Emphasising on the irreversibility of death sentence, the Supreme Court Tuesday granted 2000 Red Fort attack convict Mohd Arif an open court hearing to convince the court why his punishment required reconsideration.

Giving hope to the death row convict, a Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice T S Thakur said Arif’s review petition shall be heard in open court again if he files such a plea within a month.

Arif, the court held, shall get this opportunity irrespective of the fact that his curative petition has already been dismissed. The bench modified a previous order that had disentitled death row convicts to seek open court hearings of their review petitions if their curative petitions had been rejected.

[related post]

By a verdict in September 2014, the court had ruled that all review petitions of death row convicts shall be heard in an open court by a three-judge bench. But the convicts whose curative petitions had been dismissed before this judgment were deprived of this benefit. Earlier, review petitions were heard in judges’ chambers.

However, on Tuesday, the Bench underscored that it was the irreversible nature of capital punishment that had prompted it to allow open court hearings in such cases and convicts should not be denied this opportunity only because their curative petitions had been dismissed.
It also observed that since very limited grounds are available to a convict in a curative petition, whereas he can argue on various points in the review petition, dismissal of a curative petition may not be held as the final word on the facts of the case.

[related post]

It asked Arif’s counsel to file a fresh review petition within a month and then the matter shall be placed before a three-judge bench to hear his case in open court. His counsel had earlier argued that the classification in the previous judgment was artificial, as dismissal of curative petition is on grounds very distinct with the review plea. He further pointed out that out of 15 death row convicts who had sought open court hearing of review petitions, only Arif was denied the benefit since his curative petition had been dismissed.

The apex court on April 28, 2014 had stayed Arif’s execution. Three people, including two Army personnel, were killed in the December 22, 2000 Red Fort attack. On August 10, 2011, the Supreme Court upheld Arif’s death sentence and dismissed his appeal challenging the capital punishment awarded to him by a sessions court, which had been affirmed by the Delhi High Court.

 

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. R
    Rajesh
    Jan 19, 2016 at 12:06 pm
    Mohammad Arif, naturally. Only one filthy cult attacks Indian soldiers. Now soon all the pseudo-seculars will come and start crying about this jihadi.
    Reply
    1. d
      dv1936
      Jan 19, 2016 at 2:06 pm
      How much money a country should spend on a murderer. Such delays show that India's legal system needs to be fixed. It also shows that the country is being run by Hijras
      Reply
      1. H
        Hindu
        Jan 19, 2016 at 4:25 pm
        This Judicial system is BRITISH made...it protected Britishers who committed crime on us. Congress has ADAPTED the same to protect its criminals.
        Reply
        1. R
          Rajesh Rao
          Jan 19, 2016 at 10:57 pm
          Why was he alive so long ? Since 2000, those family who lost their beloved family member due to this terrorist. suffered, while he lived ?
          Reply
          1. S
            Shafted mohammed
            Jan 19, 2016 at 10:58 pm
            Ise Jaldi se tango.
            Reply
            1. S
              Shyamal Ganguly
              Jan 19, 2016 at 12:49 pm
              What a dithering court system!!! Vacillating, confused, delaying and corrupt court system of India. OMG!!! IS he not an ociate of Afzal Guru? If yes, hang him.
              Reply
              1. S
                Subramanian Venkatraman
                Jan 20, 2016 at 3:08 am
                When someone is accused of a murder, every day becomes a torture for him, irrespective of whether he is actually guilty or not. By prolonging cases for years, the Courts are only torturing him, not providing him with 'fair prosecution'! I would like the judges prosecuted under the Cruelty to Animals Act because the judges treat the accused as animals without any feelings!
                Reply
                1. Load More Comments