Raja-Mandala: Spying gracelessly

It’s natural for India and Pakistan to spy on each other. But it’s time they instituted spy swaps to bring them home when they get caught.

Written by C. Raja Mohan | Updated: March 29, 2016 12:14 am

pakistan-spy-759

It’s shocking! So shocking to discover that New Delhi and Islamabad spy on each other! Louis Renault, the corrupt police captain in the film Casablanca, who simulates shock at gambling in Rick’s cafe, endears himself by lacing venality with wit. The media warriors in South Asia, however, refuse to let even a bit of commonsense colour their easy outrage. The latest provocation for their huffing and puffing is Pakistan’s claim that it has arrested an Indian spy in Balochistan.

It’s not for nothing that spying has been called the second-oldest profession. It’s as ancient as statecraft. Any self-respecting sovereign would maintain an effective ring of spies as the first line of defence against potential threats, both internal and external. All states indulge in spying, political and commercial. And not just against their adversaries. Keeping a tab on your friends and partners is considered just as important.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

Thanks to WikiLeaks, we know how intensively the United States spies on its friends. The US National Security Agency (NSA) was routinely snooping on German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff.

What is really shocking, though, has been the lack of any grace attached to spying in the subcontinent. Elsewhere in the world, it’s respected as a tough profession and valued as a special art. India and Pakistan have generally tended to disown spies who get caught. It would be more sensible for India and Pakistan to acknowledge, at least in private, their respective spooks and bring as many of them home through spy swaps. That’s what Russia and America did at the height of the Cold War.

We might never really get to know the real story behind the claims and counter-claims in Islamabad and Delhi on the purported arrest of an Indian spy in Balochistan. Truth is always hard to pin down in the cloak and dagger business. For Islamabad, the claim reinforces the charge that India is destabilising Pakistan in Balochistan. These charges are not new. Recall the insistence of then Pakistan Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani to include Balochistan in a joint statement with then-PM Manmohan Singh on the margins of the 2009 non-aligned summit at Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt.

Unlike the UPA government that turned defensive amid the angry reaction in Delhi, the NDA government is a lot less coy on these things. Some analysts would see the incident boosting Delhi’s current image of being very tough on national security. It might also be an advertisement for the new will in Delhi to pursue muscular approaches to counter Pakistan’s cross-border terrorism.

What’s intriguing, though, is the Pakistan army’s statement that it has raised the issue of Indian spying in Balochistan when General Raheel Sharif called on visiting Iranian President Hassan Rouhani last week. In his press conference at the end of the visit, Rouhani, however, denied that there was any discussion about the Indian intelligence agency, R&AW, and its alleged activities in Iran and Balochistan.

That General Sharif publicly accused Tehran of colluding with Delhi in Balochistan is a reminder that all is not well between Iran and Pakistan. Although the R&AW is a favourite whipping boy for Pakistan, Islamabad has problems of its own with Tehran in Balochistan. The border between Iran and Pakistan, which runs down the Baloch lands into the Arabian Sea, has long been turbulent. At the end of 2014, the simmering tension boiled over into an exchange of fire between the security forces of Iran and Pakistan. Tehran has long accused Pakistan of sheltering Sunni militant groups, like Jundullah and Jaish al-Adl, hostile to Iran.

That’s only one part of a more complex story in Balochistan. Enduring tribal resentments in Balochistan against Pakistan’s oppression have erupted in frequent revolts over the decades.

The Pakistan army, which has put them down with considerable force, has often accused Delhi and Kabul of supporting the Baloch insurgents.

If Delhi has longstanding complaints about Pakistan’s cross-border terrorism, Kabul points to Rawalpindi’s open support for the Afghan Taliban, whose leadership has made Quetta, the capital of Balochistan, its home. Tehran has long been apprehensive of the Afghan Taliban’s Sunni extremism and has been wary of its return to power in Kabul with the Pakistan army’s support.

Delhi and Tehran have, indeed, had a common interest in countering Taliban rule in Afghanistan during 1996-2001.That’s not all. Don’t forget the Russians, Americans, Saudis and Israelis — all of whom have had varying degrees of interest and involvement in the politics of Balochistan.

China now has growing stakes in Balochistan, where its ambitious Pakistan economic corridor connects with an even more expansive project, the 21st century Maritime Silk Road. As China builds a new port in Gwadar, Iran is building its own a few miles to the west in Chabahar.

One doesn’t have to count all the competing interests and contradictions to appreciate that Balochistan will remain a dangerous but very inviting hunting ground for the world’s spies in the coming years.

The writer is director, Carnegie India, and consulting editor on foreign affairs for ‘The Indian Express’

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

First Published on: March 29, 2016 12:13 am
  1. A
    Avinash Patwardhan
    Mar 29, 2016 at 11:18 am
    I do not understand why we should swap spies. I am clueless about the logic.
    Reply
    1. A
      Apalled
      Mar 30, 2016 at 2:54 am
      It wasn't merely spying, he was involved in sabotage and terrorism.
      Reply
      1. F
        Farhan Nastik
        Mar 29, 2016 at 12:59 pm
        So if an officer from our country who has given many years of selfless service to the nation, gets caught, we should let him/her languish in a stani jail?
        Reply
        1. M
          MF
          Mar 29, 2016 at 5:04 pm
          A reality check. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;
          Reply
          1. B
            B.Ganga Raju
            Mar 29, 2016 at 4:24 am
            Are our intelligence agencies modelled after MI 5 And 007 ? " Spies are the eyes of a king." so it goes. With satellite transmissions of military activities on ground, how much is left to spy upon? What information one cannot get, is obtained through friendly sources operating in the same country. Now-a-days it is reported that Mossad is actively helping Indian agencies. It is an occupation hazard for any spy that his existence is denied by his masters. So where is the question of acknowledgeing and exchange of spies as if they are prisoners of war?
            Reply
            1. K
              Kautilya
              Mar 29, 2016 at 4:21 am
              India and stan have a spy swap arrangement. They exchange their corpses.
              Reply
              1. A
                ashok
                Mar 29, 2016 at 7:12 am
                Both sides must have an inventory of captured Bonds. Good idea to exchange them from time to time.
                Reply
                1. S
                  Saify
                  Mar 29, 2016 at 6:07 pm
                  Agh. Does any1 remember that SPY PIGEON? I remember a lot of blabbering abt that from our friendly neighborhood i.e. India
                  Reply
                  1. H
                    Hemant
                    Mar 29, 2016 at 5:50 am
                    The problem is that Pak may not be interested in bringing back its own spies through swaps. They want to score points by playing to the galleries. When there are hundreds of suicide bombers and hundreds killed by them, what is the value of life of a spy to bring him back?
                    Reply
                    1. W
                      Waqar Usmani
                      Mar 29, 2016 at 5:20 am
                      Nobody Knows. They might be having some secret swap deal. But the idea of making it prominent one in geo-political domain of relationship between India and stan is quite nuanced ertion. Hope this brings appeal to establishment at both the sides.
                      Reply
                      1. Load More Comments