‘Questionable’ troop movement: Manish Tewari’s confirmation unites Congress, BJP in denial

Party rejects remarks, questions locus standi; Antony says ‘nothing to say’; Aiyar says ‘something’ did indeed happen. VK Singh says Tewari has ‘no work’.

By: Express News Service | New Delhi/chandigarh | Updated: January 11, 2016 8:03 am
manish tewari, army troop Former Union Minister Manish Tewari. (Express Archive)

The Congress on Sunday appeared divided on former union minister Manish Tewari’s remarks that The Indian Express’s report on the movement of troops in 2012 was “unfortunate… but true”. The official spokesperson of the party rejected Tewari’s statement and questioned his locus standi, but senior leader Mani Shankar Aiyar said it seemed “something” had indeed happened that January night.

Tewari, a member of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence when the report appeared on April 4, 2012, stood by his statement. He said he had nothing to add to, or subtract from, what he had said on Saturday. Tewari was in the Standing Committee until August 2012. He remained a member of the Consultative Committee on Defence until he became minister in October that year.

The Original storyThe January night Raisina Hill was spooked

The then defence minister, A K Antony, chose to remain silent. When contacted by The Indian Express on Sunday, he said, “I am in Kerala. I have nothing to say.”

AICC spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi said the matter had been clarified by senior ministers of the UPA government in 2012, and “I am again clarifying that there is absolutely no truth in the allegation or insinuation or innuendo in respect to which we have heard again today.”

Video | Indian Express story on troops’ movement ‘true’: Manish Tewari (App users click here)

Read | Lt-Gen A K Choudhary: ‘Troop movement should’ve been avoided if they knew (V K Singh’s) court date’ 

He said “some troops movements are a necessary, in-built, and an inevitable part of a defence mechanism, but to read into it all the other elements is completely wrong and misconceived.

“I am constrained to say the same thing about the supposed statement given by my valued colleague and I am constrained to say the same thing about what is reported in the press about that statement. And therefore, I wish to clarify that since my colleague was neither a member of the Cabinet Committee on Security nor of any of the relevant decision making bodies, it was inappropriate, unnecessary and completely wrong to suggest that there was truth in those allegations when made,” Singhvi said.

“I wish to reiterate that and I wish to request and advise on behalf of the Congress party that such remarks and observations in respect to which he is neither the authorised spokesperson of the party nor the spokesperson on foreign and defence affairs nor privy to any of the relevant committees and decision making groups should have been and should be in the future completely avoided,” he added.

At a book release function in Delhi on Saturday, Tewari had said, “…That time I used to serve in the Standing Committee on Defence and it is unfortunate but the story (The January night Raisina Hill was spooked: Two key Army units moved towards Delhi without notifying Govt) was true. Story was correct.” He subsequently told The Indian Express that Defence Ministry officials who had briefed the Standing Committee had “privately confirmed” to him “that the story ‘may just be true’”.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

On Sunday, Tewari said in Chandigarh, “Whatever I said yesterday (Saturday), I have nothing more to add or subtract to that.” He said he was unaware of the statements made by Singhvi.

“I am coming (here) straight from Ludhaina, I have not seen what anybody else has said, so therefore as I am concerned, may I just reiterate… that I have nothing more to add or subtract to what I said yesterday,” he said.

In a tweet, the former minister, however, took on the then Army Chief Gen V K Singh, who had been reported to have dismissed Tewari’s statement earlier in the day, saying it had come from a “person who has no work these days”, and that Tewari “should be asked to read my (Singh’s) book which reveals everything (on the issue)”.

“Why is Right Hon’ble MP from Ghaziabad getting so antsy of course I would love to read his book provided he promises to read mine — in offing!” Tewari tweeted.

While Tewari’s party rejected his Saturday’s statement, his senior colleague Mani Shankar Aiyar told The Indian Express on Sunday: “I don’t have any information which you do not have. But it seems something happened on that night which was against the Constitution and our democracy.”

Aiyar said “it is good that the issue has come up again… At least in this context, Singh should be expelled (from the Council of Ministers).”

The Left parties demanded a statement from former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and then Defence Minister Antony.

“A K Antony… should speak now. He should explain. The Prime Minister was Manmohan Singh. Now that the issue has once again acquired a political dimension, the people should be informed about the truth,” senior CPI leader D Raja said.

CPM Politburo member Brinda Karat said, “It is a serious matter. It is for Manish Tewari to explain what he is saying… to come out with full information… The truth has to come out.”

Senior Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Ashutosh demanded a probe. “Manish Tewari’s statement on troop movement during V K Singh’s time is important, can’t be brushed aside, should be enquired throughly,” he tweeted.

The Indian Express had reported that late in the night of January 16, 2012, the day the Gen V K Singh approached the Supreme Court on the issue of his date of birth, intelligence agencies had reported an unexpected (and non-notified) movement by a key military unit, from the Mechanised Infantry based in Hisar as a part of the 33 Armoured Division, in the direction of Delhi. A large element of the airborne 50 Para Brigade based at Agra was also observed moving towards Delhi around that time.

The then defence secretary, Shashi Kant Sharma, was asked to cut short his visit to Malaysia and return. He opened his office at 11 pm on January 16 and asked Lt General A K Choudhary, then Director General Military Operations (DGMO), to see him and explain what was going on. The DGMO was asked to return with full facts about the movement, and was told to send the units back immediately. Both the military formations were halted, and sent back within hours.

In February 2014, Lt Gen Choudhary confirmed the troop movement and the late-night meeting. In an interview to The Indian Express, he said that the Army should have avoided the movement around the same time as Gen Singh approached the Supreme Court, and that there was immaturity on both the side of the Army and the government.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. H
    Haradhan Mandal
    Jan 11, 2016 at 4:23 am
    India never faced any armed coup from its Army , but most of its neighbor had MANY times. Many big countries are 'notorious' in 'destabilizing' govt/democracy across the globe (Asia, L America , Africa for their mineral/oil resources) - whom they don't see as friendly. ALL ination of political leaders across the world are pointers of involvement of 'foreign' hand(s) that Indira hi used to allude so many times in her times. And she used to be ridiculed for that.
    Reply
    1. P
      Prabhakaran Pappalil
      Jan 11, 2016 at 4:24 am
      Manish Tewari is slowly becoming a disgrace to the Congress Party and to the country by bringing in the most traditional army of India who always stood by the country and not to its petty politics. This sort of "news springs" from politicians who have been holding responsible positions in UPA should receive appropriate response from the High Command of the INC.
      Reply
      1. A
        Ajay Singh
        Jan 11, 2016 at 2:08 am
        Nonsense and full of contradictions, has been all along. If the Army wanted to mount a coup then (a) they would have used a much larger body or troops - the reported number of less than a thousand is much too small (b) there would have been multiple such simultaneous coordinated movements across India since it is not enough just to do this in Delhi and (c) they would not have tamely marched back on the orders of the defence secretary who is a much lower functionary in the scheme of things after the PM and the Defence Minister. General V K Singh's case was before the Supreme Court at the time and not before the Central Government so this exercise would have served no purpose for him even to just "spook" the government if that was indeed his intention. In the end he lost the case in court and stepped down at the end of his term, in correct observance of the way things work under our Consution. Why does Mr Tewari make just this short statement of the "story was unfortunate but true" and then refuse to say anything further? What was true? That the Army columns moved (which we all know is true but completely unremarkable since dozens of Army columns move around India every day) or that some of his colleagues in the Govt of India were spooked (which may be true but we need not particularly care about: their non-performance on defence and much else is there for all to see) or that the Army wanted to mount a coup (which Mr Tewari has no way of knowing anyway since his position in the Standing Committee has to do with review of policy and nothing to do with day-to-day operational matters). If there was any substance to the coup theory then by now someone in the army would have come out with a version corroborating it since such a conspiracy could not be limited to a small number of officers.... troops do not just move around, they do so under specific plans and orders, with supporting arrangements for logistics and so on. I am no fan of V K Singh - the man seems to have been too self-centred and uncaring about the dignity of the post he held. But I have to agree with him when he says that Tewari is digging this up to simply to stay in the limelight especially since he has a book coming up - and the rebuttal of his statement by the official spokesman of the Congress would strengthen this view. The story and the resulting controversy is most unfortunate: it goes to dent our morale as a nation and injects a dangerous seed of doubt about the relations between important insutions of our nation to serve no purpose other than stoke our collective appee for sensational gossip, no matter how patently ridiculous. As a final word, let it be said that it is next to impossible for the Army to mount a successful coup in India: the country is too large; the Army is too diverse in terms of ethnic make up and so on; and the people of India would not brook it.
        Reply
        1. अशोक.गोविंद.शहा
          Jan 11, 2016 at 1:04 am
          VANDE MATARAM-AUOTHENCITY OF REPORT CAN NOT BE CONFIRM BY JOURNALIST OR UN ATHORISED SPOKE PERSON.AFTER DINEAL BY THEN ARMY CHIEF AND GOVT SO CALLED STORY PROVE TO BE ,MISLEADING AND CONFIRMATION AFTER FOUR YEARS SEEMS TO BE MISHCHIVAS AND DELIBRAT ATTEMP TO DEFAME MODI GOVT AYYAR AND TIWARI ARE DISGRUNTALED ELEMENTS AND ARE DISREGARDED BY PEOPLE OF INDIA .PURPOSE OF REOPENING OF THIS NEWS MAY NOT BE HONEST AND PEOPLE OF INDIA HAVE AND ILL TAKE CARE OF IT JA G TE R HO
          Reply
          1. S
            SK
            Jan 11, 2016 at 4:47 am
            Discredited and disgraced, he was removed from the list of congress spokesmen but Tiwari was trying to get back by raking some dust on VK Singh but it backfired. Let us see what Sonia does about him.
            Reply
            1. K
              Karunakaran
              Jan 11, 2016 at 1:21 am
              It is fairly evident the PDP has seen the terrible consequences as a result of partnership with BJP. The Central Government is entirely run by the PMO, and not by the parliament. The Parliament, where all matters should be discussed, hardly knows what is happening. Because, the crouching, dokhla-eating Gujjubhai, cannot speak. The crouching, dokhla-eating Gujjubhai, only knows how to do the drama-queen acting for the invited cheering supporters (mostly Gujjus), but he cannot speak. So the Central Government is run by the PMO, not by the Parliament. PDP has seen the result of Delhi elections, the result of Bihar elections, the result of Gujarat elections, and the result of even Madhya Pradesh elections. Most voters have deserted the BJP and the drama-queen, crouching, dokhla-eating Gujjubhai. So PDP's future can only be with the Congress party. Congress party is sincere. No false promises like those of the crouching, dokhla-eating Gujjubhai.
              Reply
              1. C
                Col S
                Jan 11, 2016 at 4:49 am
                Such comments by TEWARI and Aiyer EXPOSE their ignorance and poor / PETTY THINKING and expression. TWO units moving to CHANGE GOVERNMENT as and BEST is stopped by guards a at octroi. Irony is that senior EDITOR swallowed it . We have reached a stasge where PEOPLE NO MORE RESPECT or VALUE he comments of such OPINION makers.
                Reply
                1. A
                  Arun
                  Jan 11, 2016 at 5:16 am
                  So far as Indian Army is concerned it will never ever think of forcing Military Rule/Army Coup in India.There are many Army Commands existing in Army as such no one will support any such move to replace Democracy.One really surprised to know who had stupid idea in spreading such rumor in Delhi when VK Singh was Army Chief and made people of this country fool.This is how our print Media is irresponsible and have no regards towards Indian Army.Really it is really shame on the part of such news papers which give irrelevant news to increase its circulation in the name of freedoms of speech,expression forgetting its effect on public. Suppose if there is anarchy in India still Indian Army will never ever think of replacing any Govt at Centre but it will help any Govt to maintain law and order to avoid anarchy.Such Sensational news will reduce News paper's credibility and honesty in public's eyes and as such in future no one take them Seriously and look at them with suiously and question mark over their integrity towards nation.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments