Paresh Rawal apologises to Kejriwal for violating odd-even rule

"Made a serious blunder by travelling in a odd number car to Parliament ... Sorry to Arvind ji n Delhiite...(sic)," Rawal tweeted.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Updated: April 25, 2016 8:39 pm
paresh rawal, odd even Paresh Rawal later tweeted a challan copy, saying he has paid a fine for violating the odd-even rule.

BJP MP Paresh Rawal on Monday violated the odd-even rule by reaching the Parliament in his even-numbered car following which he apologised to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

“Made a serious blunder by travelling in a odd number car to Parliament … Sorry to Arvind ji n Delhiite…(sic),” Rawal tweeted.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Rawal later tweeted a challan copy, saying he has paid a fine for violating the odd-even rule.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

WATCH INDIAN EXPRESS VIDEOS HERE

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. J
    Jagjit Singh
    Apr 25, 2016 at 9:45 am
    He has proved that Abhibetas have more national character than netas.
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. I
      IML sood
      Apr 25, 2016 at 3:59 pm
      Report seems to be fake as it is unavailable in any other media except IE.May be a trick from Trickester Party to earn cheap publicity.Who can agree with these bunch of jokers?
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. K
        Kabaka
        Apr 25, 2016 at 1:45 pm
        THERE IS NOTHING CALLED LOGIC FOR SOME SELF CENTERED SOCIAL DUMBS like brahmins.
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. A
          Avinash
          Apr 25, 2016 at 2:34 pm
          But when paresh rawal expressed sorry, why to drag it beyond a point.
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. A
            Avinash
            Apr 25, 2016 at 2:31 pm
            Its is ok Paresh Sir. Please help us next time...not for AAP but for a nobel cause.lt;br/gt;It is our collective effort to make odd even a success (evenif it does not help reducing pollution to a great level).
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments