Not in favour of uniform civil code, want codification of Muslim Personal Law: Noor Jahan

Keeping in view the debate on uniform civil code, the law body had sought public opinion on the revision of family laws to avoid social injustice.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Updated: October 14, 2016 12:00 pm
triple talaq, noor jahan triple talaq, uniform civil code, law commission uniform civil code, noor jahan uniform civil code, sharia law, india news, indian express, Noor Jahan. (Source: ANI)

A day after the Law Commission asked the public seeking response on abolishing the practice of triple talaq or implementation of a uniform civil code, the petitioner in triple talaq case, Noor Jahan, has said that she is not in favour of the uniform civil code. “Not in favour of Uniform civil code, seeking codification of Muslim Personal Law,” Noor Jahan told ANI.

WATCH VIDEO: Muslim Law Board vs Government: Where The Battle Stands

Keeping in view the debate on uniform civil code, the law body had sought public opinion on the revision of family laws to avoid social injustice.

The Law Commission on Friday had issued an appeal, saying that the objective behind the same was to address “discrimination against vulnerable groups and harmonise the various cultural practices,” assuring that “norms of no one class, group or community will dominate the tone and tenor of family law reform”.

“The Commission hopes to begin a healthy conversation about the viability of a uniform civil code and will focus on family laws of all religions and the diversity of customary practices, to address social injustice rather than plurality of laws,” law panel chairman Justice B S Chauhan (retd) had said on Friday.

WATCH VIDEO: Muslim Law Board Rejects Law Panel Questionnaire: Find Out Why

The petitioner Noor Jahan had sought an order from the Supreme Court stating that Section 2 of Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, was unconstitutional as it violated fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 (equality), 15 (non-discrimination), 21 (life) and 25 (religion) of the Constitution. In her petition, Jahan has questioned whether an unilateral and arbitrary divorce through triple talaq should deprive the wife of her rights in her matrimonial home as also her right to have the custody of her children.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

    Live Cricket Scores & Results