• Associate Sponsor

National Herald case: HC notice to Subramanian Swamy on plea against trial court order

Justice Sunita Gupta also issued notice to Subramanian Swamy seeking his reply on or before March 15 on the pleas which also sought staying operation of the trial court's January 11 order.

By: PTI | New Delhi | Updated: February 17, 2016 7:43 pm
herald, national herald case, subramanian swamy in national herald case Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the response of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy on plea seeking to set aside trial court order of January 11. (Express file photos)

Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the response of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy on pleas seeking to set aside trial court order allowing summoning of documents from Ministries of Finance and Corporate Affairs, Income Tax Department and other agencies in the National Herald case.

Justice Sunita Gupta also issued notice to Swamy seeking his reply on or before March 15 on the pleas which also sought staying operation of the trial court’s January 11 order.

“I am issuing notice to the respondent, but not staying the proceedings before the trial court,” the judge said.

Share This Article
Related Article

The petitions filed by AICC Treasurer Motilal Vora and Young India Ltd, through senior advocates R S Cheema and Rebecca John, said the trial court has not heard them and the order passed was an ex-parte order.

“Swamy has sought all documents but no specific period has been mentioned in his application before the trial court and still his plea was allowed,” Cheema contended, adding that the January 11 trial court order must be quashed or set aside.

Swamy’s plea seeking summoning of documents from the Ministry of Urban Development, Delhi Development Authority and Registrar of Companies was also allowed by the trial court.

He had told the court that he needed these documents, which are in the custody of these ministries, for advancing arguments in the case.

The trial court had on December 19, 2015, granted bail to Congress President Sonia Gandhi, her son Rahul and three others– Motilal Vora, Oscar Fernandes and Suman Dubey– who had appeared in the court pursuant to summons issued earlier.

Sam Pitroda, another accused, was granted exemption from personal appearance for that day only on medical grounds.

The case is based on a private criminal complaint lodged by Swamy against them of cheating, conspiracy and criminal breach of trust. The documents which Swamy had sought pertained to Associated Journal Ltd (AJL).

The apex court on February 12 had exempted Sonia and Rahul Gandhi from personal appearance before trial court in the case. It had, however, left it open for trial judge to seek their personal appearance if he thought it appropriate at any stage.

The matter is scheduled to come up for hearing in the trial court on February 20.

Sonia Gandhi, Rahul, Vora, Fernandes (AICC General Secretary), Dubey and Pitroda were summoned under sections 403 (dishonest misappropriation of property), 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) read with section 120B(criminal conspiracy) of the IPC.

The trial court had on June 26, 2014 asked them to appear before it on August 7, 2014 but the order was stayed on August 6, 2014 by the Delhi High Court which on December 7 last year had vacated the stay by rejecting the plea to quash the complaint and the summons.

On December 15, 2014, the high court had further stayed the summons till final disposal of the petitions.

All the accused had challenged the summons issued to them by trial court on Swamy’s complaint.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. K
    Feb 17, 2016 at 2:30 pm
    Nehru "Dienasty" is so scared of NH case and are trying all dirty tricks to stall the proceedings.
    1. A
      Feb 17, 2016 at 6:00 pm
      1. J
        Jemma Thomas
        Feb 17, 2016 at 9:50 pm
        These are all the same criminals have been saying that they want to expose Swamy before public by proving that they are criminals. And now what they are trying to do, as normally all other criminals do, trying to obstruct justice as they have been doing in relation to this case for past 3 years, going after court to court and to delay and frustrate the entire process. Vexatious mob. They are vatican mafia criminals and it is time people teach them a electoral lesson in the coming state election so that will allow the courts to speed up the case and bar them from holding any position in any party for life.
        1. J
          Feb 17, 2016 at 10:11 pm
          Make comments with you true name you stupid...
          1. Nagar Iyer
            Feb 17, 2016 at 1:44 pm
            (What more evidence we require to ert that our SC and HCs are filled with CORRUPT TH-IEVES in the name of Judges? ) (What is the 'propriety' on the HC intervening in the Trial Court when the Trial has not even commenced?) ( More than 1 year has been wasted after the compliant has been filed by Dr. Swamy. ) (The HCs and SC are intervening in response to FRIVOLOUS appeals by the TWO FRAUDS. ) (They have decided to ensure that this will never be heard by the Trial court.) IDENTIFY ALL THE CORRUPT THIEVES sitting as JUDGES in our HCs and SC and HANG THEM WITHOUT DELAY
            1. Load More Comments