• Associate Sponsor

National Herald case: SC to consider early hearing of Sonia, Rahul plea

A bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice R Banumathi assured senior advocate Kapial Sibal, representing the Gandhis, by saying "we will look into it".

By: PTI | New Delhi | Published: February 11, 2016 7:33 pm
National Herald case, National herald story, what is national herald, sonia gandhi, rahul gandhi Sonia Gandhi with Rahul Gandhi (File photo)

The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will consider the pleas of Congress President Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi that their appeals against the Delhi High Court verdict, refusing to quash summons issued to them in the National Herald case, be heard tomorrow.

A bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice R Banumathi assured senior advocate Kapial Sibal, representing the Gandhis, by saying “we will look into it”.

Share This Article
Related Article

Sibal said Subramanian Swamy, the BJP leader who has filed the criminal complaint against the UPA Chairperson and five others, had earlier agreed to February 12, the scheduled date of hearing, and now he is saying he is not available till February 19.

The Gandhis and other co-accused may now have to appear again before the magisterial court here on February 20 if they fail to get any interim relief, on the issue of their personal presence, from the apex court.

Earlier, the Congress President, her son Rahul, Suman Dubey and Sam Pitroda had filed appeals in the apex court against the High Court verdict in the case.

The High Court had on December 7, 2015 not only refused to quash the summons issued to the Congress leaders, but had also made scathing observations on their “questionable conduct” regarding how they took control of the publication.

Subsequently, the Gandhis and others had appeared before a Patiala House court on December 19 last year when they were granted bail.

The High Court, while refusing the plea of Gandhis and others, had said, “Questionable conduct of petitioners needs to be properly examined at the charge stage to find out the truth and so, these criminal proceedings cannot be thwarted at this initial stage.”

Along with the Gandhis, five other accused–Suman Dubey, Moti Lal Vora, Oscar Fernandes, Sam Pitroda and Young India Ltd–had challenged the summons issued to them by a trial court on a complaint by Swamy against them for alleged cheating and misappropriation of funds in taking control of the now-defunct daily.

Swamy had accused Sonia, Rahul and others of conspiring to cheat and misappropriate funds by just paying Rs 50 lakh by which YI obtained the right to recover Rs 90.25 crore which the AJL had owed to the Congress party.

Sonia, Rahul, Vora (AICC Treasurer), Fernandes (AICC General Secretary), Dubey and Pitroda were summoned under sections 403 (dishonest misappropriation of property), 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) read with section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC.

The trial court had on June 26, 2014 asked them to appear before it on August 7, 2014 but the order was stayed on August 6 by the Delhi High Court which on December 7, 2015 vacated the stay by rejecting plea to quash the complaint and summons.

According to Swamy’s complaint, all of them were directors of Young Indian Ltd (YI), a company that was incorporated in 2010 and which took over the “debt” of Associated Journals Ltd (AJL), the publisher of National Herald.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. prakash gotimukul
    Feb 11, 2016 at 6:39 pm
    This news doesnt deserve more than 2 sentences, but TOI being a paid news will everytime write the full details of the case with a smiling family accused, who shd be shown in a police van with grills masking their blackened faces. Shameless family, shameless TOI
    1. A
      Feb 11, 2016 at 3:05 pm
      Why should they get the relief ? Law should be same for all.. If 76 years old asaram bapu has been kept in jail for no charges proven yet then why madam and pappu roam around freely.How come lalu and jayalalitha got the bail inspite of being culprits ?
      1. R
        Feb 11, 2016 at 3:14 pm
        Is there really any doubt that Nehru family are thieves? They even got thief and loyal lapdog Kapil Sibal to defend them.
        1. Hari Goyal
          Feb 11, 2016 at 6:33 pm
          SC always ready to help big and influential.
          1. Hanamant Kulkarni
            Feb 13, 2016 at 6:12 am
            They showed their hands to learn their future, but only to get rebuked. If his wished to invoke SC, then why that bravado and thousands of supporters before Magistrate's court earlier? Now it is settled, they have to face the Trial - first of its kind for the family. Relief from personal appearance - is it a victory?
            1. Load More Comments