• Associate Sponsor

PM Narendra Modi’s Balochistan remark: The full story so far

While the Prime Minister's remarks were met with angry reactions from Islamabad and a section of Opposition parties in India, it also received support from Baloch leaders who thanked him for raising the issue.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Updated: August 26, 2016 11:39 am
Narendra Modi, Pakistan, Balochistan, Modi balochistan, PM Modi Balochistan remark, Jammu and Kashmir, PM Modi balochistan Prime Minister Narendra Modi waves from Red Fort during his speech, his third on Independence Day from the same venue. Source: Express photo Renuka Puri

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech sought to bring back the focus on Balochistan, nearly seven years after an India-Pakistan joint statement mentioned it, which led to an outcry over the UPA government’s Pakistan strategy.

While the Prime Minister’s remarks were met with angry reactions from Islamabad and a section of opposition parties in India, it received support from Baloch leaders who thanked him for raising the issue.

Islamabad claimed his remark “only proves Pakistan’s contention that India, through its main intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing, has been fomenting terrorism in Balochistan”.

READ: Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech: PM throws down Balochistan gauntlet

PM Modi’s remarks also faced sharp criticism from Pakistan’s main Opposition leader Bilawal Bhutto, who said he should first account for the alleged “atrocities” committed by India in Kashmir before talking about Balochistan. Bilawal said the words used by the prime minister were “highly provocative, irresponsible and inflammatory”.

“Modi should first stand accountable to the international community for unending and perpetual atrocities against Kashmiris, Muslims and Dalits in Kashmir and in India,” said Bilawal, chairman of Pakistan People’s Party (PPP).

WATCH: Why Has India Written A Second Letter To Pakistan Stressing Talk On Terror


Pakistan opposition leader Bilawal Bhutto blasts PM Modi for Balochistan comments

Pakistan today further said that PM Modi crossed the “red line” by talking about Balochistan and asserted it will “forcefully” raise the Kashmir issue at the UN General Assembly session next month.

Foreign Office Spokesperson Nafees Zakaria alleged that India was involved in subversive activities in Balochistan and Karachi and the Balochistan remark was aimed at covering up its human rights violations in Kashmir.

Narendra Modi crossed ‘red line’ by talking about Balochistan: Pakistan

Zakaria’s reaction came a day after India accepted Pakistan’s invitation to visit Islamabad to discuss aspects related to cross-border terrorism, which are central to the current situation in Jammu and Kashmir. India has, however, insisted that it would talk only on “contemporary and relevant” issues in Indo-Pak relations and not Kashmir.

Reacting to Zakaria’s statement that Prime Minister Narendra Modi crossed the “red line”, the Ministry of External Affairs on Thursday said it finds it an extraordinary remark by a country which recognises no red line in its diplomacy.

“I find this an extraordinary remark from a senior functionary of Pakistan that recognizes no red lines in its own diplomacy. Pakistan’s record of cross-border terrorism and infiltration is at the heart of the problems in the region today. And this not just India’s view. You can ask some other countries in the region too,” Vikas Swarup, spokesperson of Ministry of External Affairs, said.

Meanwhile, Baloch leaders showered praise for the prime minister’s stance on Balochistan. Khalil Baloch, chairman of the Baloch National Movement, said in a statement that the “policy of indifference towards Pakistan’s war crimes in occupied Balochistan that include both ethnic cleansing and genocide, adapted by the international community is worrying. The Indian Prime Minister’s statement on Balochistan is a positive development.”

“Baloch nation hopes that the United States and Europe will join Prime Minister Modi and hold Pakistan accountable for the crimes against humanity and the war crimes it has committed against the Baloch nation in 68 years of its occupation of Balochistan and during the five wars that the Baloch nation has fought with Pakistan to win its national freedom,” added Baloch.

Back home, PM Modi’s remarks created consternation among the political establishment, with the Congress party aiming to discredit the Prime Minister for taking up the issue of Balochistan and supporting the cause of Baloch leaders. Congress said the PM Modi is not the first one to talk about Balochistan, insisting that the UPA government had consistently spoken about the “spiralling violence” and “heavy Pakistani military action” in the region. 

PM Narendra Modi not the first to talk about Balochistan, UPA did it too: Congress

“Congress and UPA government have condemned the human rights violations in Balochistan as also in PoK by Pakistani forces and establishment on multiple occasions in the past,” party’s chief spokesman Randeep Surjewala said, noting that the first time the UPA did so was on December 27, 2005.

Congress further fine-tuned its attack on the Modi government for its ‘inconsistent’ foreign policy, with party leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi asking the government to end its “knee-jerk” policy with Pakistan and fix problems within the country first before raising issues such as Balochistan.

“It has become almost impossible for us to track this government’s daily changes in policy. One day, we are talking at Ministerial level, one day we are talking at Foreign Secretary level, one day we are calling off. I am waiting for a stable policy,” said Singhvi.

Modi government’s foreign policy changes faster than weather: Congress

National Conference leader and former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah too directed his angst at the PM and said he should discuss about the part of J&K which is burning. “If PM wishes to talk about Balochistan he can, but he should also discuss about part of J&K which is burning,” said Abdullah.

The NC leader also urged the prime minister to engage in dialogue with Pakistan. “When you say Kashmir is integral part of India, you are talking of land not people. Make people yours too. We are supporters of a dialogue process between India & Pakistan, we believe that a dialogue is the only way. It is responsibility of both PM Modi and Nawaz Sharif to create atmospherics for dialogue,” he said.

PM Narendra Modi should talk about Kashmir which is burning, says Omar Abdullah

Even the CPI(M) wasn’t on the same page as the Prime Minister on Balochistan when party general secretary Sitaram Yechury lashed out at him for referring to “human rights violations” in Balochistan and Gilgit during his Independence Day speech. Yechury had said it would give Pakistan an opportunity to “internationalise” the Kashmir issue.

“On Monday, in his speech, the Prime Minister spoke about human rights violations in Balochistan and Gilgit. We have been saying that Kashmir is an integral part of India. Nobody has the right to interfere in its affairs. But now we have started talking about Balochistan,” said Yechury.

Meanwhile, the RSS supported PM Modi’s remarks saying India is morally right to rake up the Balochistan issue. Senior RSS leader Indresh Kumar had said that India is “morally right” to rake up the Balochistan and Gilgit Baltistan issue and claimed that Pakistan treats its own people like “third grade citizens” and uses bombs to crush muhajirs and provincial independence movements.

India is morally right to rake up Balochistan issue: RSS leader Indresh Kumar

He claimed Modi raising the Gilgit-Baltistan and Balochistan issue was morally right when the provinces are plagued with difficulties and witnessing murders.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. D
    DR S
    Jun 8, 2017 at 8:18 pm
    GREETINGS FROM BLK SUPER SPECIALTY HOSPITAL DEAR FRIENDS, GET INDIA RUPEES 1 CRORE BY DONATING YOUR KIDNEY. Do you want to sell your kidney for money? BLK Super Specialty Hospital is urgently in need for kidney donors. ALL BLOOD GROUP IS ACCEPTED If anyone is wil to donate kidney please contact us immediately and we shall offer you 1 Crore Rupees for your kidney Regards Dr. S. Prakash Phone: 917066960793 Email: bklsuperhospital.drsunil@gmail
    1. D
      Aug 18, 2016 at 6:08 pm
      India can do whatever they want but will never be able to change muslim mindset. India is a secular country but only for Hindus. CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHICH SECULAR LAW MUSLIMS IN INDIA PRACTICE. Can muslim practice 4 marraige at a time and fast food style divorce in any non muslim Democratic Secular country in the world. WHY MUSLIM ARE ALLOWED 4 WIVES AS PER QURAAAAAN BUT WHEN IT COMES TO CRIMINAL AS THEIR RELIGION.. NO FLOGGING, NO LIMB CHOPPING. I think India should impose complete Sharia law as in muslim countries.. and bring criminally convicted muslim for open flogging in Cricket Stadiums and let people buy tickets to watch it and hotels and airlines should run tourism package called SHARIA PACKAGE to watch Taj Mahal and Muslims Flogging. I am sure muslims won't complain as it as per their religion.lt;br/gt;Kashmir.. Kashmir solution is what Jinnah and hii decided. All Muslims to stan and all Hindus to India. Believe me.. till india practices in spirit 1947 deal, no peace. Nothing wrong.. India is only country which wss cut to give muslim separate home land. START A MOVEMENT HASHTAG.. THOSE MUSLIMS WHO FLY STANI FLAGS, CALL THEMSELVES STANIS MUST BE FORCIBLY SENT TO STAN AND FULL SHARIA LAW INCLUDING FLOGGING, LIMB CHOPPING FOR MUSLIM IN INDIA. lt;br/gt;Bharat mata ki jai.
      1. R
        May 29, 2017 at 11:56 pm
        Muslim women too can divorce. What is intention of banning three able talaq. in order to loot the men. Like how in Hindu community, 95 cases filed by wives on husbands are false. It is for looting men.
      2. D
        Aug 18, 2016 at 6:17 pm
        Indians learn from small country like Burma or Maynmar. Burma took care of its muslim and pushed muslim to sea. Today Burma's growth rate is much higher than India. Nobody asked AUNG SUNG to give her noble prize back and she wants to be informed if she is going to meet a MUSLIM. Muslims will hurt you, attack you and kill you becuase it in their Qura....n but if you retaliate then Muslim say human rights violation, free speech, democracy and bring out their impotent Hindu leaders like Dig Deafeat Singh, Khujliwal, Sibal, Pappu etc...
        1. D
          Aug 18, 2016 at 7:36 pm
          By the way.. Muslim scripture say kill Kafir.. go google wiki pedia. If i am kafir to them or india is kafir to them then we have every right to self defense and neutralize enemy who wants to kill me became i am a non muslim.
          1. D
            Aug 18, 2016 at 7:32 pm
            It will happen.. even if you vote. Muslims are doing this to themselves. It is like 1984 or 1947 situation in india. India is going to erupt in anti muslim. On everty Friday... muslim come out mosques in Kashmir and start throwing stones to security forces, indian Muslims watch that.. they can create a counter narative on fridays coming out of mosques with indian flags. No indian muslim and muslim are delusional if they think when Kashmir gets Azadi they will distribute sweets and have EID. They have no idea what happened in 1947. Today world opinion is against muslim who can't live with non muslims in non muslims countries. Except preaching me tell me what i said is wrong. Read word EID in muslim way.. left to right.. you get their Allah 's answer. They going home. stan daily sends hindu refugees.. the minute few lakh muslim families reach stan, stan and Muslims politics in region will change. I am saying those who don't love india, raise stani flag, go to stan which was created for them. It is just a matter of time when Modi and BJP will adopt this line for Kashmir muslim and muslims in india. You may vote again down... no explanation needed. I have seen 1947 as a little kid.
            1. Load More Comments