Mumbai Police drop Radhe Maa’s name from dowry case

Kaur is the only one among the seven persons named in the FIR to be dropped in the chargesheet.

Written by Mohamed Thaver | Mumbai | Updated: October 17, 2016 2:03 pm
Radhe Maa, Radhe Maa news, Radhe Maa dowry case, Radhe Maa police complaint, Radhe Maa cases, Radhe Maa controversy, Who is Radhe Maa, India news In July last year, one Nikki Gupta approached the police alleging that her husband and his parents, who were disciples of Kaur, had been harassing her for dowry.

Self-styled godwoman Radhe Maa has not been named as an accused in the cheating and dowry harassment case filed against her a year ago.

In the chargesheet filed before the Borivali magistrate’s court, Kandivali police have named six persons, including the complainant’s husband and parents-in-law, as accused and dropped the name of Sukhvinder Kaur alias Radhe Maa. Kaur is the only one among the seven persons named in the FIR to be dropped in the chargesheet.

WATCH VIDEO |

 

 

Senior police inspector of Kandivali police station Mukund Pawar told The Indian Express, “We did not find any evidence against Sukhvinder Kaur, hence she has not been named as an accused.” The chargesheet was filed about 10 days ago, he added.

In July last year, one Nikki Gupta approached the police alleging that her husband and his parents, who were disciples of Kaur, had been harassing her for dowry. She alleged that they were harassing her at Kaur’s behest. Following this, the Kandivali police registered an FIR against seven persons, including Kaur.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    amar s
    Jul 5, 2016 at 8:43 am
    in BPJ rssssss rule all ammas babas and goondas will be rewarded and aquited - modified india
    Reply
  2. R
    R.Mehta
    Jul 5, 2016 at 2:13 am
    The husband of complainant Nikita Gupta and other family members from her husbands side are the persons responsible for promoting sukhvinder kaur as having some super natural powers .Not only they have provided her accomodation in their house ,but followers of Sukhvindrr Kaur also visits Guptas house to meet her and thus the famiky is totaly influenced by her and does not take any decesion without her advice. Though she is not a member of the family ,but there may be truth in the complaint of Nikita Gupta regarding role of Sukhvinder kaur in instigating the Gupta family to make demands from family of the complainant view of same there was nothing wrong in filing chargesheet against her and allow the complainant to prove the charges by producing evidemce against her and it should have been left to the Court ,either to proceed against her or discharge her in the case .Because thete were other complaints against her by some of her other folliwers for various other allegations and thus complaint in the present case may not be unfounded .
    Reply
  3. R
    Rajesh Natrajan
    Jul 5, 2016 at 6:50 am
    modi effect
    Reply