The National Investigating Agency (NIA) has raised questions over the Maharashtra Anti Terrorism Squad’s (ATS) handling of the Malegaon blast case in which it has been accused of using torture to extract confessional statement from the accused and the invoking of MCOCA provisions against them.
In the supplementary chargesheet filed on Friday in a special court in the case of the 2008 blast in which seven people were killed, the NIA listed many “shortcomings” in the ATS’ investigations and claims how courts did not believe the confession statements of the accused.
- A trial and an ever-widening chasm in Malegaon
- 2008 Malegaon blast case: Court not exonerating Pragya Thakur is vindication of our probe, says ATS
- 2008 Malegaon blast case: MCOCA gone, Sadhvi Pragya and Colonel Purohit to face trial under anti-terror law
- Malegaon: ATS, CBI did not name them, why did you, says HC to NIA
- 2006 Malegaon blasts: Why ATS, CBI and NIA reached different conclusions, asks Bombay HC
- NIA may not oppose bail plea of Malegaon accused
The NIA said that accused Sudhakar Dwivedi when produced before the magistrate for confirmation of the confessional statement made by him, stated that his confession was the outcome of torture meted out to him.
The agency also said that “dubious” methods adopted during investigation by ATS become crystal clear from the disappearance of one of the main witness.
“The CBI during its investigation in the disappearance of the witness has submitted findings against the officers of the ATS Mumbai,” the agency said.
“ATS Mumbai invoked MCOCA on the basis of the involvement of accused Rakesh Dhawade in the previous two blast cases i.e. Parbhani and Jalna in which the concerned courts had taken the cognisance. The way and circumstances in which the ATS invoked the provisions of MCOCA in this case becomes questionable”, the NIA chargesheet said.
According to the NIA chargesheet a case was registered in November 2003 in Parbhani bomb blasts. The chargesheet was filed against two accused persons Sanjay Choudhary and Himanshu Panse. While in September 2006 first supplementary chargesheet was filed against accused Maruthi Keshav Wagh and Yogesh Deshpande.
“The second supplementary chargesheet was filed against accused Dhawade on Novmber 13, 2008 after his arrest on November 11, 2008 i.e within two days of his arrest (in Parbhani case),” the NIA said.
“This raises considerable doubt on the integrity of invoking of MCOCA by ATS,” the chargesheet said.