97-yr-old freedom fighter tries to torch liquor shop

According to the police, Chimman Lal Jain had announced that he would begin torching liquor outlets from January 30, the death anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, as part of his campaign.

By: PTI | Agra | Published:January 31, 2016 3:23 pm
Mahatma Gandhi, Gandhi, Gandhiji, Father of the nation, Freedom fighter, fighter, campaign, campaigning, Campaign againt alcohol, campaign against alcohol addiction, fire, liquor shop, liquor, fire liquor shop, police, January 30, death annivarsary of Mahatma Gandhi,  St Peter's College, Uttar Pradesh, ban on liquor, ban on liquor shop, Agra news, india news Chimman Lal Jain tried to set fire to a liquor shop but was stopped from doing so by the police. File Photo

A 97-year-old freedom fighter, who has been campaigning against alcohol addiction, tried to set fire to a liquor shop but was stopped from doing so by the police.

According to the police, Chimman Lal Jain had announced that he would begin torching liquor outlets from January 30, the death anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, as part of his campaign.

Earlier, he had attempted to jump into the Yamuna on October 2, the birth anniversary of the Mahatma, over his demands, but was foiled by the police.

On Saturday, as Jain marched towards a liquor shop in Dhuliaganj, a police team stopped him and took him back to his home at Pathwari, where he was kept confined till late in the night.

He led a march of volunteers from St Peter’s College to MG Road and back with placards and banners calling for an immediate ban on liquor sale in Uttar Pradesh on Sunday.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Aap
    Jan 31, 2016 at 1:49 pm
    It is govt approved curse on our country that so many families suffer due to addiction. Many people take law in hand to har people but u r doing a good job.
    Reply
  2. P
    P.R.Koduri
    Jan 31, 2016 at 12:28 pm
    There is much to learn from the way the Oregon protest and occupation was handled to uphold the rule of law.
    Reply