IS ‘operatives’ had differences over picking India chief: NIA

The chargesheet, filed Monday, stated that to elect the “Ameer-e-Hind”, the man to lead the members to establish “Khilafat” in India, the alleged IS members held their first meeting on November 1, 2015.

Written by Kaunain Sheriff M | New Delhi | Published:July 21, 2016 4:47 am

WHO WILL head the Islamic State (IS) in India? It was this question that led to differences within members of the terror group, claims a chargesheet filed by the NIA in a special court in Delhi.

The chargesheet, filed Monday, stated that to elect the “Ameer-e-Hind”, the man to lead the members to establish “Khilafat” in India, the alleged IS members held their first meeting on November 1, 2015. The meeting ended in a deadlock, after an “infuriated” Yusuf-al-Hindi, an IS handler now based in Syria, disagreed over the choice made by six members. The decision by the alleged members was later overturned and Yusuf-al-Hindi’s man declared “Ameer-e-Hind”.

The chargesheet — against 16 suspected IS operatives — said the meeting in Lucknow was held “with an agenda to establish Khilafat in India and formation of an organisation, namely Junoodul-Khilafa-Fil-Hind (Army of Caliph of India)”.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

Watch Video: What’s making news

It said the meeting was hosted by one of the accused, Mohammed Aleem of Lucknow, and was attended by other accused — Nafees Khan, Mudabir Mushtaq Shaikh, Mohammed Hussain Khan, Rizwan Ahmed, Ikrama and Mohammed Aleem. The NIA alleged that members at the meeting decided that 23-year-old Ikrama, who hails Madhya Pradesh and belongs to the Darul-uloom in Deoband, should be made the “Ameer for the whole of India”, but Yusuf was “infuriated” with the decision.

“He was not happy with the decision taken in the meeting as Ikrama was not senior enough to become an Ameer… Yusuf made a voice call to Nafees’s phone on Skype… As suggested by Yusuf, the post of ‘Ameer-e-Hind’ was decided to be given to Mudabbir Mushtaq Shaikh,” the chargesheet said, adding that Ikrama was designated as Askari Ameer (battalion commander) and Nafees from Bihar was declared Maliyat Ameer (head of finance).

According to the chargesheet, a second meeting was held on November 25, 2015, this time in Bengaluru in the house of accused Mohammed Afzal.

It was attended by accused-turned-approver Abdul Ahad and other accused Mohammed Afzal, Asif Ali, Syed Mujahid, Najmul Huda and Nafees. In this meeting, the NIA claimed, the structure of the organisation in Karnataka was decided and while the post of Ameer was kept vacant, Nafees was named his deputy, Najmul Huda as the battalion commander and Asif Ali as the Media Ameer.

It said Yusuf “advised” Ameer-e-Hind Mudabbir to “learn to make a time-bomb by using a mobile phone”. “At the instance of Yusuf, Mudabbir purchased a Yeptel mobile, a soldering rod, soldering wire and also conducted experiments,” the chargesheet stated.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

    Live Cricket Scores & Results