Ishrat Jahan affidavit controversy only to divert attention from real issue: P Chidambaram

The BJP has turned the heat on Sonia Gandhi alleging that she asked Chidambaram to file a second affidavit in the case as UPA 'could tolerate terrorists but not Modi as prime minister."

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Published: April 25, 2016 1:35 pm
ishrat jahan, ishrat jahan case, chidambaram, BJP, congress, sonia gandhi, narendra modi, amit shah, ishrat jahan affidavit, india news Former Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram. (Express archive photo)

Former Union Minister P Chidambaram said the controversy around the second affidavit in the Ishrat Jahan case ‘is only to divert attention from the real issue.’

“Real issue is whether there was fake encounter & whether FOUR people already in custody were KILLED in that FAKE ENCOUNTER,” Chidambaram wrote on Twitter.

The minister’s remarks come a day after a slew of top Congress leaders came together to rake the contents of the CBI’s 2013 chargesheet in the case. The party claimed the testimony of a Gujarat police officer in it showed that the encounter killings had the prior approval of Narendra Modi and Amit Shah.

The controversy around the second affidavit in the case generated heat after Home Minister Rajnath Singh informed the Lok Sabha in March that documents related to the preparation of the second affidavit are missing and that an internal inquiry has been ordered into the case.

The BJP has turned the heat on Congress president Sonia Gandhi alleging that she asked Chidambaram to file a second affidavit in the case as UPA ‘could tolerate terrorists but not Narendra Modi as prime minister.”

At a press conference on February 29, Chidambaram had said the first affidavit was filed without his approval.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

“As minister, when it was brought to my notice that the first affidavit was ambiguous — which was filed without my approval — and it was being misinterpreted, it was my duty to correct the first affidavit. So we filed a supplementary affidavit after consulting the home secretary, the director of Intelligence Bureau and other officers,” he had said.

Ishrat Jahan, a 19-year-old from Mumbra and three others were killed in an alleged fake encounter on June 15, 2004 outside of Ahmedabad. The Gujarat police had claimed that Ishrat and her associates were involved in a plot to assassinate then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi. The CBI is currently conducting investigations into the case.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. ALBERT ANTONIO
    Apr 25, 2016 at 8:34 am
    It's a ploy to divert attention. Courts have ruled that the killings were carried out in fake encounter by Gujarat police. So that's that.
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. T
      TIHAEwale
      Apr 25, 2016 at 9:30 am
      PC this is one more instance when Congress mishandled and could not complete task. Amit was tadiporofied from Gujrat. Senior police officials were sent into custody as under trials but today all out and your are out of office.
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. A
        Anitha
        Apr 25, 2016 at 9:35 am
        The REAL ISSUE is NOT whether the encounter was FAKE or GENUINE. The REAL ISSUE is whether Ishrat was a TERRORIST or NOT. There is irrefutable and incontrovertible evidence that you cleared the FIRST AFFIDAVIT when the nefarious machination to implicate Modi had not yet embryogenesised. Later on, on the direct order from your MAFIA BOSS, you changed the first affidavit.
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. A
          arun
          Apr 25, 2016 at 12:55 pm
          Chidambarams talking like this is like Devil quoting the scriptures. As per many reports his family owns business worth billions in foreign countries made using the money he and his party looted in various scams like 2G etc.
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. Barb Dewyre
            Apr 25, 2016 at 7:48 pm
            Why does the BJP government insist on fighting their battles through the media? If they have the requisite proof, file legal charges and police complaints. It's been two years since they came to power but all we've seen is a lot of hot air but no concrete action.
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments