The state government on Wednesday opposed the demand for a CBI probe into the Una Dalit atrocity incident before the Gujarat High Court, saying that the investigation done by the CID was “immaculate”.
In an affidavit filed before the division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi, the government also said that Thangadh Dalit killing incident of 2012 had “a completely different set of facts that cannot be equated with the facts of the present (Una) case”.
- The Royal Opera House Reopens After Decades Of Neglect: Here’s A Quick Tour
- Tata Sons Rubbishes Cyrus Mistry’s Allegations: Here’s What Happened
- Pakistan High Commissioner denies allegations leveled on his staffer for espionage activities
- Odisha: Villagers Refuse To Cremate Dalit Woman’s Body
- Here’s What Farhan Akhtar Said On Karan Johar-MNS ‘Deal’ Over Ae Dil Hai Mushkil’s Release
- Government’s Diwali Gift to Central Government Employees, Pensioners
- Bigg Boss 10 26th October Review: This Episode Is All About Fights
- New Zealand Beat India By 19 Runs In Ranchi; Series Levelled At 2-2
- DND Toll-Free: Noida Toll Company Moves Supreme Court Against Allahabad High Court
- British PM Theresa May Says Kashmir Is A Matter For India, Pakistan To Sort Out
- J&K: Students Suffer As Schools Along LOC Forced To Shut Amid Firing
- Jayalalithaa’s Health: AIADMK Women Supporters Continue Special Prayers For CM
- HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle First Look Video
- Fissures Remain Within Samajwadi Party: All You Need To Know
- Big Cheer For Delhi-Noida Commuters, DND Flyway Becomes Toll Free
The government’s reply came in response to a public interest litigation seeking a CBI probe in the Una case where some Dalit youths were flogged in public on the suspicion of having killed a cow.
The petition said the probe by state CID may remain inconclusive, as in the case of death of three Dalit youths in police firing at Thangadh in Surendranagar in 2012.
The government’s affidavit said that while in the Thangadh case CID filed a closure summary report (saying there was no evidence), in the Una incident CID had filed a charge sheet against all the accused, including four policemen.
“The (Thangadh) incident has a completely different set of facts….In so far as the present case is concerned, immaculate investigation has been carried out by the team (of CID),” it said.
Witnesses’ statements and reports of the Forensic Science Laboratory and material evidence had made the prosecution’s case strong, the government said.
“The charge sheet has been filed in less than two months against 34 accused and other charge sheets for other accused will be filed in due course,” it said.
Advocate Ratna Vora, the lawyer for petitioner Kantibhai Chavda, today argued that he suspected there was a “larger conspiracy”, which CID had not probed.
The HC asked the petitioner to file a reply by October 18.