Haji Ali Dargah and entry of women: All your questions answered

The Maharashtra Government had said that women cannot be banned from entering the inner sanctum of Haji Ali Dargah unless this is an integral part of the Islamic faith.

Written by ZEESHAN SHAIKH | Mumbai | Updated: August 27, 2016 12:52 pm
haji ali dargah, haji ali verdict, bombay high court, haji ali mosque, women entry in haji ali, women in haji ali, haji ali mumbai, haji ali women, india news Haji Ali Dargah verdict: The Bombay High Court on Friday directed the trust to allow women in the inner sanctum of the shrine. (Express archive photo by Neeraj Priyadarshi)

The genesis of the Haji Ali Dargah conflict lies in a campaign launched by the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA), which works for empowerment of Muslim women, in the implementation of the Sachar Committee report. Before starting the campaign, activists of the group decided in June 2012 to offer prayers at the Haji Ali Dargah, a 585-year old shrine of Sayyed Peer Haji Ali Shah Bukhari, located on an islet off the Mumbai coast.

Activists realized that women who earlier had access to the Asthana — the actual spot where the saint is buried — were now not being allowed to go inside and touch the tomb.

The Haji Ali Dargah is governed by the Haji Ali Dargah Trust which is a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act. The trustees of the Dargah had decided to deny women access to the grave in 2011, calling the practice un-Islamic. It had stated that it was rectifying its earlier mistake of allowing women to touch the actual grave.

Entry to the main hall of the Dargah is segregated for men and women: men enter through the south, women through the east. At present, separate arrangements have been made for women. They are allowed to proceed to a certain point which is an area of approximately 275 sq feet — three feet away from the tomb — from where they can pray.

Read | Haji Ali, Shani Shingnapur and Trimbakeshwar: Indian women reclaim religious places

After the trustees’ decision to deny women access to the grave and failed discussions, the BMMA took their case to the Maharashtra State Minority Commission and the State Minority Welfare Department which expressed their inability to intervene in a religious matter.

The BMMA finally filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court in August 2014 against the “blatant discrimination on the ground of gender alone” saying it impinges on their fundamental rights and also “the failure of the state to eliminate inequalities”. It asked the state to ensure that access to the inner sanctum was restored.

What does Islam say about women visiting graves?

Shrines are technically the burial places of holy men. There is no explicit direction in either the Quran or theHadees restraining women from visiting graves provided they do not indulge in actions which are contrary to the Sharia.

Men as well as women visit the final resting place of the Prophet Mohammed in Medina. In the Dargah at Ajmer, women have access to the inner sanctum. The BMMA which did a survey of 19 Dargahs in Mumbai found that 12 of these provided unfettered access to women.

There are claims that in the sayings of the Prophet, there are objections to the visitation of graves by women, however opponents of this school of thought say that these claims are weak.

What is the defendants’ case?

The Trust has claimed that the intermingling of men and women in an enclosed place around the tomb causes discomfort to both the sexes and the decision to stop women from entering is to avoid this inconvenience. The trustees have claimed that the intermingling “disturbs men mentally and women are disturbed physically.”

“There is no discrimination but only females are not allowed to touch the tomb of male saint. The Quran is very clear on that,” Shoaib Memon lawyer representing the Haji Ali Trust told the Bombay High Court.

What is the state government’s stand in the High Court?

The Maharashtra Government had said that women cannot be banned from entering the inner sanctum of Haji Ali Dargah unless this is an integral part of the Islamic faith. The state has claimed that religious practices cannot be interfered with, but customs and traditions will have to give way to the Fundamental Right to freedom of religion.

Since the issue cropped up in 2012, the state has refrained from directly intervening in the issue. At the Court hearing, the Advocate General stated that if there are difficulties in implementing constitutional rights, the court must step in. “Artificial discrimination based on sex could run foul of Article 15 of the Constitution,” the then Attorney General Shrihari Aney had told the Bombay High Court.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. A
    Aug 26, 2016 at 10:29 am
    We are welcome the court decision for women visiting dargah. If women performing the hajj and ummra then why not visit in dargah
    1. S
      Saffiuddin Sheikh
      Aug 27, 2016 at 8:26 am
      Now onwards advocate has to learn hanfi jurisprudence(the jurisprudence followed by majority of ummah) to fight these cases on court.
      1. S
        Saffiuddin Sheikh
        Aug 27, 2016 at 9:08 am
        The Question is who is the owner of the place or shrine, and it is registered on whose name and who are the care taker. And apart from them who has what right to enter that place? lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;And for that does it need permission of the owner or care taker. If yes, then there is no point for asking for woman's right. Neither men nor women who are from outside can even enter the place without owner/care takers permission. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;if it is a government land government can take the decision. Apart from this debating in court is just a waste of time because lawers neither memorize all hadith or ayat neither they know hanfi jurisprudence(School of thought). Neither there is any authorization to any organization(khilafah, ijazah) so all of this will be not just funny but dangerous. If it succeeds, individual bodies will try to take decision from Quran by them selves, without following maintaning rules of any shcool of thought. Which will miss-lead them to mis-guidance. By which world is already suffering e.g. terrorism(because of fism, wahbism don't follow any school of thought). They become their mufti by themselves, and their imam don't go for any debate. They decide them self ignoring islamic fiqh. So consequences will even dangerous
        1. A
          Avishek Avishek
          Aug 26, 2016 at 7:54 am
          Trustees say, "disturbs men mentally and women are disturbed physically"...what exactly they do inside the shrine... how can men get disturbed just seeing a praying women, unless he is big time pervert
          1. B
            Bhagavath B S
            Aug 26, 2016 at 8:09 am
            Both men and women should not be allowed inside the darga. Darga belongs to Hindustan, so handed over to Hindus.
            1. H
              Aug 26, 2016 at 7:57 am
              Inside an masjeed or tomb also men are aroused after seeing an woman in religion of peace.total pervert.
              1. K
                Aug 27, 2016 at 11:32 am
                I don't understand why some women in the name of women empowerment doing all sorts of things which are against any religion, or school of thought, or some tradition for that matter, I believe the courts should not interfere in one's right to practice/ believe/ follow a tradition. It is unconsutional. I don't understand why media s openly always come in support of women in every issues. Media is totally biased towards women.
                1. A
                  Ashok Mazumdar
                  Aug 27, 2016 at 1:29 am
                  Muslims have more important issues to Solve. Why r they making a Fuss. Carry on Pl.
                  1. M
                    Aug 30, 2016 at 4:46 am
                    Sabarimala trekking is not that easy. One needs to walk through the mountain trails barefoot. The general belief among the pilgrims is that the wild elephants and tigers will never harm the devotees of Lord Ayyappa. Lord’s vehicle is tiger. Before venturing into the forest barefoot and unarmed, people used to observe strict asceticism for about a month. This is also an example of peaceful co-existence of human and wild life. Now most of the original values of the sacred place has been lost due to the influence of forest encroachers encouraged by communists and Church. It is obvious that the intention of the NGOs supporting the women's group is to destroy the age old Hindu tradition. Shortly the court will p the verdict for entry of women in Sabarimala. The HC order for the entry of women in Haji Ali Dargah is a well planned conspiracy to maintain equillibrium. Thousands of cases relating to justice for Musim womens are pending in courts. The Chief Justice is lamenting about the lack of judges in courts. The courts are omly considering cases. Many pending cases are more than 20 years old. These type of arbitrary taking up of cases, adjournment at will and availing leave for luxurious summer vacations characterize the Indian Judiciary today. It is time to dismantle the collegium system. The Collegium judges are not impartial. These lawyer turned judges cannot deliver justice
                    1. A
                      Anower Ali
                      Aug 26, 2016 at 9:42 am
                      This is a welcome decision by the court. We wheartedly support it. I believe the H/A Dargah authorities have visited Ajmer Dargah for sure where one of the greatest sufi saints of Indian subcontinent Hajrat Khaja Garib Nawaj is resting in peace for ever.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Anyone can visit that Dargah (i mean the inner area of that Dargah) irrespective of his gender, cast, creed, religion, nationality, rich, poor etc. Even hijras are regular visitors there- I myself have witnessed that during annual Urs. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Can H/A authorities say that is un-islamic rituals? It's high time that you self custodians of Islam should stop giving such foolish logic in the name of islam. Fatwa/logic like this has done irrepairable damages to muslims.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;It's the responsibility of the muslims to honour the judgement without dragging it to Supreme Court.
                      1. p
                        Aug 27, 2016 at 9:07 am
                        Did we receive such a large article explaining about Shani Sanctrum? or Shabari malai?
                        1. R
                          Raghav Uchil
                          Aug 27, 2016 at 7:29 am
                          good decision. It is a slap on the face of the Fundamentalist Muslims who try to enslave women in any form..
                          1. A
                            Aug 26, 2016 at 7:53 am
                            Unless the religious authorities can prove beyond doubt that it is un-Islamic for women to touch the grave, they should be permitted to do it.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;In so far as inconvenience or disturbance, either mentally or physically, is concerned, the argument is without merits. there can be many ways of avoiding physical contact between the men and women. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;And mental disturbance.... unless a man or woman is morally weak, they will not cause any such disturbance. It is a vague argument.
                            1. V
                              Aug 26, 2016 at 11:04 pm
                              If that is indeed true, then ban the men from entering the shrine. Why ban women?
                              1. V
                                Aug 26, 2016 at 11:05 pm
                                It is immetrial and irrelevant what religious texts say. Those are expired outdated books with no real value.
                                1. F
                                  Aug 27, 2016 at 1:06 pm
                                  What is this sufi grave worshipping act about? Aren't muslims supposed to worship only Allah as Allah has commanded in the Quran and the Prophet himself has said so? Can you answer me?
                                  1. Load More Comments