The special trial court will pronounce the quantum of sentence to 24 convicts in the Gulberg Society massacre case on Friday.
Special judge P B Desai, who on Monday fixed the date for pronouncing quantum of sentence, had on June 2 convicted 11 under serious charges, and 13 for minor offences. It acquitted 36 accused.
The 11 were found guilty of murder, unlawful assembly, loot and arson among other offences, while 12 were convicted for unlawful assembly, arson and loot. One accused was convicted for attempt to murder, unlawful assembly and other charges.
- Court says of Gulberg massacre victim Jafri: His firing angered mob, made them kill
- Gulberg Society massacre: Court sentences 11 persons convicted of murder to life in prison
- Gulberg society massacre: Quantum of sentence to be announced tomorrow
- Gulberg society massacre: Court defers judgment on quantum of sentence till tomorrow
- Gulberg massacre case: SIT seeks death or life term for all convicts
- Gulberg Society verdict: 24 convicted, 36 acquitted in second worst massacre of Gujarat 2002 riots
Meanwhile, Kailash Dhobi, convicted for murder, showed up in the court after he jumped parole in January. He was sent to Sabarmati Central Jail.
Dhobi was accused number 1, held for killing at least six people during the riots. He was in jail since 2002 till he was granted relief in December. The court had recently asked authorities to arrest him as early as possible.
The prosecution, the Supreme Court appointed-SIT, has sought death sentence or life in jail till death for all the convicts, arguing they all have been held guilty for unlawful assembly, which meant that they had a common objective — to kill people from the minority community.
On the other hand, the victims’ lawyer did not seek death for any of the convicts, but argued that they be given harshest punishment like life imprisonment till death. The victims’ lawyer also demanded that all convicts be punished for the major offence.
However, the defence lawyers opposed these submissions on the ground that the court did not believe the allegation of conspiracy, and therefore, the punishment should be given for individual acts.