To delink caste from quota for ‘poor’, BJP steps over faultlines

The Gujarat government is committed to honestly implement 10 per cent reservation for non-reserved poor people.

Written by Sheela Bhatt | New Delhi | Published:May 11, 2016 5:24 am
gujarat, BJP, gujarat BJP, muslims in gujarat, gujarat muslims, muslim quota, minority quota, gujarat government, gujarat bjp chief, vijay rupani, indian express news Vijay Rupani, Gujarat BJP chief.

BRUSHING aside legal objections and what critics describe as fears of “social tension”, the BJP government in Gujarat is pushing to implement its new 10 per cent reservation for the poor during college admissions starting this month.

“The Gujarat government is committed to honestly implement 10 per cent reservation for non-reserved poor people. We have issued the notification and have instructed all educational institutions to start admitting students as soon as the results of classes X and XII are declared. The process will start within a month,” Gujarat Education Minister Bhupendrasinh Chudasama told The Indian Express.

Read | We never said poverty has been removed totally from Gujarat: Vijay Rupani, Gujarat BJP chief

However, the decision has triggered an undercurrent of tension among various groups who are yet to openly oppose the idea, fearing a political backlash. More so, with observers suggesting that the move is a reflection of RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s suggestion before the Bihar polls last year that the caste-based reservation system needed a relook.

“The Gujarat government is serious. The Patidar agitation has given them a chance to implement the RSS-BJP’s old agenda for Gujarat to introduce reservation on the basis of economic criteria,” said Gaurang Jani, advisor to the state OBC commission and associate professor of sociology in Gujarat University.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

Jani said that in the two major anti-reservation riots in Gujarat in the 1980s, BJP had sided with the upper castes — since then, the Patel, Brahmin and Baniya communities have backed the party. “But Gujarati society at large is ready to experiment with the BJP’s idea if the court doesn’t intervene in this sociopolitical issue,” said Jani.

The latest decision, unveiled on April 19, provides 10 per cent reservation to individuals from families that earn Rs 6 lakh or less annually and who are not covered by caste-based reservations.

Alpesh Thakor, who heads the OBC-ST-SC Ekta Manch, said the government move is being looked at “with suspicion”. “We are in a kind of suspended disbelief. There is tension all over Gujarat among all castes about this. The Patels and other upper castes feel that this political decision will be stayed in the very first hearing by a court. All of us will be back to square one,” he said.

“We are not against the poor from upper castes. Like us, we know that they suffer. We want to tell the BJP, ‘don’t play politics’. Also, look after our poor as well,” said Thakor.

Anand Yagnik, Ahmedabad-based lawyer, described the decision as a “complete violation” of the 1992 Supreme Court judgment that identified caste as the criteria for reservation. “It’s a sham. Any level of camouflage won’t help inside the courtroom,” said Yagnik.

The new quota has also elicited a mixed response from Patidars who want to continue with their demand for inclusion on the OBC list.

The Opposition Congress, too, appears to be playing it safe, with its former state chief Arjun Modhawadia virtually endorsing the move.

“After the Patidar agitation, we had announced that in line with the Congress’s national manifestos of 2009 and 2014, we want 10-20 per cent reservation in Gujarat for the economically backward classes, in accordance with their population,” he said.

Speaking to The Indian Express, BJP state chief Vijay Rupani defended the government move, saying it was in tune with “the demand of the times”. He said that the decision was also in line with various schemes of the central and state governments that cater to the poor.

Asked how the state would justify the quota if it was legally challenged, Rupani said, “We will justify it on the grounds that bright and clever children from poor families often do not get admissions in institutes of higher education. The Right to Education (RTE), introduced by the Congress, had a provision for poor children in schools. On similar grounds, we will argue that poor children who are craving for higher education need attention and a system that assures admission under RTE.”

Responding to allegations levelled by critics, such as Thakor, that the idea may not be Constitutionally viable, Rupani said, “There is no issue of the Constitution involved here. The way weaker sections get plots to build cheap houses, the way government projects are planned and implemented for them, we have carved out a quota…”

WATCH INDIAN EXPRESS VIDEOS HERE

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. M
    MyTake
    May 11, 2016 at 2:29 am
    System is rotten to such an extent that some open object in doing the right thing but not in doing the wrong thing! Beggars belief!!
    Reply
    1. V
      vijay
      May 11, 2016 at 4:10 am
      To bring about parity in economic and social status by helping the poor and down trodden is very noble and just thing to do. In India this cl of people are identified with caste.Which might have been valid while Mr Ambedkar penned this idea in to the statute book albeit temporarily. But our wily politician saw an electoral advantage in It and became very generous with it. Of course the so called recipients, once they tasted the fruitsare clambering for more of the same while the bright, efficient and really disadvantaged Indians are banging their their pans on the pavement begging for fair treatmen from this draconian reservation system rewards mediocrity and inability to apply ones mind. Moreover, those who are propagating this system has their eyes only on three benefits 1.votes 2. Quid pro quo from the recipients who has made it big by playing this system and 3. A collection of cronies and sycophants at their beck and call
      Reply
      1. V
        vijay
        May 29, 2016 at 7:28 am
        Dear Indians, It is silly to mock a political party for not bringing back and distributing 15 lakhs of black money to every Indians.True a promise to that effect was made in all honesty and intention.Only to come across legal roadblocks purposely placed to thwart the good intentions and initiatives of governments by vested interests.(and lot of othe rthings)lt;br/gt;This is why we did not get 15 lakhs each.Those who mock can grin and bear it.
        Reply
        1. V
          vijay
          May 29, 2016 at 7:14 am
          What legal impediments should the government must be weary of for doing what is morally and legally right, and, legally elected to do?. Apart from a selfish section of our society who are uneasy at the prospect of a slight reduction in the handout are agitating.The fair minded silent majority of Indians are in agreement with the idea of helping the poor.
          Reply
          1. M
            Mohammad Bin Tughlaq
            May 11, 2016 at 2:50 am
            Let the consution be re-written in a more realistic way. Present day India is not what it was some 70 years back. The fact that it was amended so many times itself means that it is not a right one. It should not be like a school boys' composition books with so many red ink marks.
            Reply
            1. S
              Sreenivasan
              May 11, 2016 at 6:40 am
              First let us see how many poor Brahmins get jobs from the general quota. From the general quota how many opportunities are being cornered by the rich people of general category? Do these people use money and positions to deny employment deserved by the poor candidates belonging to the upper casts among Hindus ? Honest answer will be, yes. They take away everything from the poor eligible candidates of the general category. Then they ask the suffering poor to fight the reservation policy.
              Reply
              1. F
                fazalfaizi
                May 11, 2016 at 7:27 am
                Bring the economy based reservation
                Reply
                1. N
                  NArayan
                  May 11, 2016 at 7:37 am
                  in that case the consution needs to change to cater to the current situation....
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments