Seen 11 PMs but never such contempt of Parliament: Ghulam Nabi Azad

The Congress also stepped up its attack on the Prime Minister over the scrapping of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes.

Written by Manoj C G | New Delhi | Published:November 30, 2016 1:43 am
Ghulam Nabi Azad, narendra modi, winter session, parliament, demonetisation debate, demonetisation, currency withdrawal, indian express news, india news Ghulam Nabi Azad

Locked in a confrontation with the government over its demand for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s presence in in Parliament for participation in a discussion on currency withdrawal, Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha Ghulam Nabi Azad said Tuesday the PM’s decision not to “show up” and “speak” in Parliament was simply baffling.

“Today, he addressed BJP MPs at the Parliament library. He has been addressing them every Tuesday. He also speaks outside the House almost regularly,” Azad said. “But he will neither come to the House nor speak. It is baffling. In my long political career, I have seen and worked with 11 prime ministers. I have worked as a minister with four prime ministers. I have not seen this kind of attitude by any of them or such contempt for Parliament,” he told The Indian Express.

Watch What Else Is making News

He said prime ministers in the past used to come to the House and intervene or speak if the Opposition demanded it persistently. “Some used to come after hours, some maybe after a day… But now the Opposition has been demanding it in unison for the last several days… but Prime Minister Modi has made it a point not to come to the House. He seems to have taken it as a prestige issue. This attitude does not augur well for parliamentary democracy,” he said.

The Congress also stepped up its attack on the Prime Minister over the scrapping of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes. The party’s communication department head Randeep Surjewala mocked the government for announcing the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana saying it is in effect a “kaladhan dharak kalyan yojana”.

He said the government is now proposing to levy 49.9 per cent as tax, penalty and cess on undisclosed income whereas according to section 271 (1) (C) (iii) of the Income Tax Act, the penalty for undisclosed income was as high as 132 per cent.

“This is Prime Minister Modi and his government’s commitment to root out black money. And to avoid questions in Parliament… the government declared the Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Bill as a money bill and passed it without a debate… This is the real face of Prime Minister Modi,” he said. “What happened today was travesty of constitutional propriety by a finance minister who claims to have intricate knowledge of law. That is why it becomes doubly culpable.”

Congress spokesperson Sushmita Dev called it the prime minister’s Krackjack or 50-50 moment. “It is a smokescreen. The tax bracket of 132 per cent has been brought down to 50 per cent,” she said. “It is the Krackjack or 50-50 moment of the government. He has let [alone] those people who have hoarded black money by taking a share of 50 per cent from them.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. I
    indian
    Nov 30, 2016 at 12:50 am
    I have seen many governments but nine as corrupt as your UPA.
    Reply
  2. C
    Chander Pal
    Nov 30, 2016 at 1:17 am
    He may be right. Let's see. 1. Nehru brought in controlled economy of licence raj with 90% tax leading to foundation of black economy. 2. Indira created history when parliament ped the emergency. 3. Rajiv was for Bofors. 4. Manmohan was never a P M he was more of a head clerk. And he declared in parliament that Muslims have first right on government treasurery. Naturally can not compete with these 'stalwarts'
    Reply
    1. S
      SURESH
      Nov 30, 2016 at 1:19 pm
      Interesting to note in a funny country a debate started by AZAD on demonetization on 16 th Nov without being any precondition that PM be present not allowed to continue and complete .The usual practice is that the concerned Minister reply in the end a rare case PM INTERVENE.EVEN AFTER URING AND PM WAS PRESENT DEBATE DID NOT CONTINUE.Janta want to see that day when debate will continue and complete.
      Reply
      1. S
        Srividya Jayaraman
        Nov 30, 2016 at 11:14 am
        You stop.your nonsense. Most of the daily labourers are happy. They are getting the money. Even my servant maod and car drivers are happy. Problem is only with people like you is mostly for to hatred towards Modi
        Reply
      2. M
        My India
        Nov 30, 2016 at 11:13 pm
        He is asking, why PM is not coming to the parliament, why nobody answering his question.
        Reply
        1. P
          PCKULKARNI
          Nov 30, 2016 at 8:27 am
          You have absolutely no idea about rural distress ,people loosing jobs . Also death of over 80 people does not bother you. What a pity.
          Reply
          1. R
            Rajib Nath
            Nov 30, 2016 at 5:13 pm
            Kashmiri and Muslim people in India will continue to remain backward because of leaders like GNA. His name is a contradiction, he is a Gulam but Azad. Is he sure himself.
            Reply
            1. S
              Saurabh Shukla
              Nov 30, 2016 at 5:43 am
              I have never seen such contempt of parliament by opposition benches in last 40 years of my life. understood they have lost millions and billions by modi's denotification move, but life has to go on and parliament has to function. Let it function please!
              Reply
              1. Load More Comments