A 60-year-old man, who had sexually assaulted an eight-year-old girl, has failed to get any relief from the Delhi High Court which upheld his five-year jail term.
Justice S P Garg dismissed the appeal of the convict against the judgement passed by a trial court last year which had sentenced him to five-year jail after holding him guilty for the offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The court held that convict Raman Kumar does not deserve any leniency as he took advantage of the tiny girl’s “loneliness” while sexually assaulting her.
“The appellant (Kumar) was aged around 60 years and victim was a child aged around eight years akin to his daughter. The appellant who was involved in various other criminal cases dared to outrage the modesty of an unsuspecting innocent, tiny girl aged around eight years taking advantage of her loneliness,” the court said.
- Varun Gandhi Under Attack Over Defence Deals: Here’s How
- This Diwali, Let Blind Students Brighten Up your Homes With Candles & Diyas
- CBI Files Supplementary Chargesheet In Sheena Bora Murder Case
- Soha Ali Khan And Vir Das Starrer 31st October Audience Reaction
- Sahara Chief Subrata Roy’s Parole Extended Till November 28
- Simple Tips To Secure Your Debit Card From Fraudsters
- New Zealand & India Team Being Welcomed In Chandigarh
- Mumbai Call Centre Scam: All You Need To Know
- Jammu Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti Appeals To Police: Here’s What She Said
- Shocker From Ahmedabad: Find Out What Happened
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
According to the prosecution, an FIR was lodged at Dadri Police Station, New Delhi in March 2013 against Kumar for allegedly molesting the minor. During the trial before the lower court, he had denied his complicity in the crime and had claimed that he was falsely implicated in the case.
The counsel appearing for the man had claimed in the high court that trial court had not appreciated the evidence in its proper perspective and the minor had given inconsistent statements at the behest of her mother.
Watch what else is in the news
While dismissing his appeal, the high court observed that various statements made by the child during the investigation and trial showed that her version was throughout consistent. “In all her statements, she has implicated the accused with certainty and has attributed a specific role to him. No valid reasons exist to disbelieve the statement of the prosecutrix,” it said.
It further said that no ulterior motive was attributed to the child for implicating Kumar in the grievous offence and in the absence of any prior animosity or ill-will, the minor was not expected to level such serious allegations to put her in disrepute.