Delhi HC reserves order on Payal Abdullah’s plea against eviction

On Tuesday, Payal had failed to get any relief from a Delhi court which directed her to vacate the bungalow in Lutyen’s Zone where she has been living since 1999.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Updated: August 19, 2016 2:21 pm
omar abdullah wife, payal abdullah, omar abdullah wife bungalow, payal abdullah lutyen bungalow, delhi news, india news Payal Abdullah (file)

The Delhi High Court Friday reserved the order of a districts court on Omar Abdullah’s estranged wife Payal Abdullah’s plea against eviction notice under which she has to vacate her government accommodation.

Delhi High Court directed her to “gracefully” vacate the government accommodation she has been residing in with her two sons.

“Will you gracefully evict or I should pass an order?” Justice Indermeet Kaur asked Payal’s counsel, who categorically stated that the court should pass the order. The judge also orally observed that every person who retires from the office has to move out.

On Tuesday, Payal had failed to get any relief from a Delhi court which directed her to vacate the bungalow in Lutyen’s Zone where she has been living since 1999. On the last date of hearing on August 12, the high court had extended till August 16 the interim protection from eviction granted on July 12.

However, on August 16 when the matter came before Justice Indermeet Kaur, Payal’s counsel sought an adjournment and it was renotifed for hearing on August 19.

She had also approached the trial court seeking stay of the June 30 eviction order issued by the estate officer of the state of Jammu and Kashmir, contending that the order was passed without allowing her to lead evidence and without granting her any personal hearing.

While Payal enjoys a ‘Z’ category security cover, each of her sons has ‘Z’ plus security, comprising of a total 94 personnel. She claimed that it will be difficult to accommodate them in a private flat in the city.

Payal, through her advocate Amit Khemka, contended that the bungalow was allotted to her husband by the central government. Khemka, therefore, argued that the Estate Officer of J&K government could not demand the eviction.

Omar was first allotted the bungalow in 1999 by the Ministry of Urban Development when he was an MP from J&K.

(with inputs from agencies)

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. J
    Jamboo
    Aug 19, 2016 at 8:32 am
    Love Jihaad se bani bhikharin.........Katuve ke kaaran Z category
    Reply
  2. M
    Maniktripathy
    Aug 19, 2016 at 8:26 am
    Free loader and looters...When will this end and if good governance has to start, it should start with these free loader/looters...
    Reply
  3. B
    Bir Chand
    Aug 19, 2016 at 10:06 am
    Total wastage of Tax payers money.
    Reply
  4. C
    Col S
    Aug 19, 2016 at 8:50 am
    Feudalism revived and Democracy !murdered by the Powerful and rich,_ practiced and promoted the COLLUDED politicians and the government.If ex CMs of UP convert Lucknow mall road into their feudal property , nothing new and this PER Continues.
    Reply
  5. G
    Guru
    Aug 19, 2016 at 10:31 am
    Then cut the security contingent size....first spend on security and then spend on space for that security, really ridiculous. She should shift to a different suburb or a farmhouse where she can afford that space.
    Reply
  6. H
    harun
    Aug 19, 2016 at 11:16 am
    94 Cops for a Legacy which served itself for 70 years at the expense of Tax Payer
    Reply
  7. K
    kulaputra kulaputra
    Aug 19, 2016 at 1:32 pm
    Can we prosecute all freeloading politicians and relatives ?
    Reply
  8. K
    KS KUMAR
    Aug 19, 2016 at 11:02 am
    What is the basis all these useless personnel are given security and accommodation at tax payers cost. What is their contribution to the country?
    Reply
  9. Load More Comments