On the last day of his examination by the prosecution in a special court in Mumbai, 26/11 scout David Coleman Headley said that Lashkar-e-Toiba operations commander Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi’s son Basi had been killed “in a firefight with the Indian Army in Kashmir. Sajid Mir, Headley’s handler, then assumed the nickname Basi “in memory of Zaki’s son”, Headley deposed via video from the US Saturday. He said the news of Basi’s death and Mir’s move was emailed to him by former Pakistan Army major and Al-Qaeda militant Abdur Rehman Pasha.
He told the prosecution that when Pakistan cracked down on LeT under international pressure following the 26/11 attacks, Mir had assured him this was only superficial action.
- David Headley: Lashkar told me to make Siddhivinayak temple video
- David Headley wanted to fight against Indian Army in Kashmir
- India to ask US,Pak to extradite accused
- Mumbai attacks: Govt nod to name Headley,Saeed,7 others in chargesheet
- ISI chief met Lakhvi in jail after 26/11: Headley to NIA
- Headley met top Lashkar men Hafiz Saeed,Lakhvi in 26/11 attack plot
Headley said he and Mir exchanged a series of emails about “old uncle” (LeT chief Hafeez Saeed) and “chhota uncle” Lakhvi; Lakhvi was also “chacha” in one of their emails. He said Mir assured him, “Everything happening to our friends is superficial,” and “Uncle (Saeed) is flying high.”
In another email, Headley expressed fears that “old uncle has got H1 virus and doctors at the hospital want to give him a check up”. This, Headley explained to the court, meant that Saeed was likely to be arrested by Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Agency.
Mir replied, “My old uncle is fit, healthy like anything and moving back and forth like a tornado” but, Headley said, Mir added that “Chacha revealed some facts about Ismail on pressure.” Ismail was Mir’s codename for Headley.
- Soon You Could Get Plastic Currency Notes: Find Out More
- Ranveer Singh and Vaani Kapoor Starrer Befikre Gets A Thumbs Up
- Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response Over Various Issues Regarding Demonetisation
- Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar Writes To West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee
- Bigg Boss 10 December 8 Review: Swami Om Feels Cheated, lashes Out At Gaurav For Jail Punishment
- South Korean President Park Geun-Hye Impeached Over Corruption Scandal
- Former Air Chief SP Tyagi Arrested In VVIP Chopper Scam
- After Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi, Liquor Baron Vijay Mallya’s Twitter Account Hacked
- Find Out What PM Narendra Modi Told Cabinet Over Demonetisation Decision
- Home Minister Rajnath Singh Assures Safety Of All Tourists Stranded On Havelock Island
- Government To Waive Service Tax On Debit, Credit Card Transactions Of Up To Rs 2,000
- President Pranab Mukherjee Criticises Parliament Disruptions Over Demonetisation
- Pakistan International Airlines Flight Carrying Over 40 Passenger On Board Crashes
- Shah Rukh Khan On Raees Clash With Kaabil: It’s Impossible To Have A Solo Release In India
- US-President Elect Donald Trump Named TIME’s Person Of The Year 2016
Made to listen to recordings of two phone calls, Headley identified the voices of three militants who were speaking to the Mumbai attackers. From the first call, from a control room in Pakistan to attackers in Taj Mahal Hotel, Headley identified Mir as saying in Punjabi, “How is your leg brother?” One of the ten attackers replied, “My leg is bleeding profusely.” From the other recording, played twice, Headley told the court he could make out the voice of Abu Kahafa among three to four voices in a long conversation.
Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam closed his deposition. Headley will be cross-examined by the defence next, for which a date has not been set.
When it was the turn of the defence, advocate Wahab Khan conveyed to Judge G A Sanap that he was unable to begin cross-examining Headley as the prosecution had not provided him with several documents. “I am not mentally prepared to cross-examine today. Perhaps I may damage my case or damage their case,” Khan said.
The court has granted time to Khan until February 22 to study the documents and decided how many days his cross-examination will require. The dates will then be communicated to the United States Department of Justice.