Constitution doesn’t allow PM Modi to deprive citizens of their money: Anand Sharma

The House began and ended with Opposition demands for PM Modi’s presence for resuming the discussion on demonetisation.

Written by Manoj C G , Shubhajit Roy | New Delhi | Updated: November 29, 2016 12:25 pm
demonetisation, pm modi, narendra modi, modi demonetisation, modi parliament, lok sabha modi, modi demonetisation parliament, congress demonetisation protest, india news, parliament session, indian express news “It is illegal and there is no law under which this has been done,” Anand Sharma said. (Source: PTI Photo)

On the ninth consecutive day that Rajya Sabha was paralysed, Congress leader Anand Sharma invoked the Constitution to attack the government over demonetisation. Azad raised a point of order, saying the Constitution specifically says a person cannot be deprived of his property by the government. He questioned how the government is depriving the country and the common man of their own money in bank accounts by limiting withdrawals.

“It is illegal and there is no law under which this has been done,” Sharma said. “Even the Constitution does not allow the prime minister or the government to deprive the citizens of their money and property, especially bank accounts. Not one bill was tabled in the House. The prime minister and the government must answer,” he said.

The House began and ended with Opposition demands for the prime minister’s presence for resuming the discussion on demonetisation. In the morning, Leader of the Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad said “Akrosh Diwas” is being observed across the country because of the prime minister’s announcement. He said it is the prime minister who is responsible for the situation and added the government had claimed the situation would improve in a week but nothing has changed.

WATCH VIDEO: Income Tax Law To Be Changed To Increase Penalty On Unexplained Deposits: All You Need To Know

The Samajwadi Party’s Ramgopal Yadav said workers are dying, factories and shops closing down and the weaker sections are facing problems. Information and Broadcasting Minister Venkaiah Naidu said the Opposition has no monopoly over the House and alleged it does not want to take part in the discussion. Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi said the opposition is not opposing currency withdrawal but the crackdown on black money.

With the Opposition demanding an apology from the prime minister for making statements outside the House attacking the Opposition, Naqvi said the PM need not apologise. “Why should he apologise… for breaking the back of black money hoarders and unmasking the corrupt… Should he apologise for empowering the poor and the weaker sections…. You should be apologising for what you are doing,” he said.

Amid slogans from both sides, the House had to be adjourned thrice in the morning. When Rajya Sabha met again at 2 pm, Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman placed a notification on behalf of Finance Minister Arun Jaitley providing for exemption of central excise duty for the manufacture of PoS (Point of Sale) devices.

Soon after this, SP leader Naresh Agrawal raised a point of order. As he started, he made certain comments about the treasury benches which were objected to. Deputy Chairman P J Kurien eventually expunged the remark after listening to both sides. After Anand Sharma raised his point of order, Azad said this is the first time such an announcement has been made and the PM has not given a statement in the Parliament. He said some are saying the Cabinet was not informed and even the finance minister did not know. “Then how can he (finance minister) reply to the points raised by us. The prime minister should be here,” Azad said.

He said Modi can come to the Parliament library for events and address every rally in Uttar Pradesh but can’t come to the House. Naqvi said the government is ready for discussion like always. “You failed with your Aakrosh Diwas on the streets, so now you are disrupting the House proceedings,” he said. In the din, Kurien adjourned the House until Tuesday morning.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Amol
    Nov 29, 2016 at 7:37 pm
    I disagree overwhelmingly.. had our fore fathers seemed comfort over hardships, this Country wouldn't have been rescued from clutches of England.
    Reply
    1. A
      Anupam
      Nov 29, 2016 at 7:04 am
      Congress has no right to question anyone because it has lost that right in last 60 years. India was on its knees internationally. In last 15 years China became a superpower just because we killed our production capabilities. Indians are the most talented when it comes to business but Congress always believed in maintaining a status quo. Just bloody vote bank politics. lt;br/gt;Our money is still out money. Just the idea of spending it has changed.lt;br/gt;Also people like small time trader are in problem as they will come in tax structure and which they should be. People can buy apple phone; latest gadgets but no card machine for there own shop saying it's complicated. Food for thought. lt;br/gt;60 years we have looked back with our eyes closed and this is what we have got. lt;br/gt;Parliament. What parliament. It has not functioned since last 2.5 years. Let's close it. Atleast I will save some taxes. Opposition is a dharna party.
      Reply
      1. I
        indian
        Nov 29, 2016 at 4:20 am
        Scamgress, consution doesn't allow u to thieve: 2g, cwg, coal, chopper, bofors, fodder, adarsh, tatra, vadra land.
        Reply
        1. C
          Chander Pal
          Nov 29, 2016 at 9:50 am
          Two points written in the consution and in our 'janam kundali'. 1. That a non Indian can run the government with a head clerk and without PM. 2. We the people of India and our descendants have to pay for life time luxury living for the fake hi family giving them accommodation in Lutyens Delhi along with 5 star 3 ring security cover.
          Reply
          1. D
            Dinesh
            Dec 4, 2016 at 4:56 pm
            Anand you must be spoon for Congress by the way where did you hide your Black Money which paid by Congress
            Reply
            1. D
              Dinesh
              Dec 4, 2016 at 5:00 pm
              Anuradha Kalyan you must be most stupid woman with your Comment you stupid Congress pig
              Reply
              1. G
                Gopi Chand
                Nov 29, 2016 at 4:07 am
                If Mr Sharma thinks Govt went above Consution then he and his party can challenge Govt in court. This statement of Anand Sharma shows his party desperate situation as they several crore rupees ill gotten wealth became
                Reply
                1. S
                  SURESH
                  Nov 29, 2016 at 1:40 pm
                  Nobody is denying white money but only black money.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments