Collegium lists 7 High Court chief justices for elevation to Supreme Court

However, Justice Chelameswar is learnt to have objected to at least one name on the list, and he is reported to have conveyed his views in writing to the remaining members of the collegium.

Written by Maneesh Chhibber | New Delhi | Published:November 14, 2016 3:33 am
supreme court collegium, supreme court judges, sc judges appointment, new supreme court judges, njac, supreme court njac Sources told The Indian Express that the names of seven high court chief justices were discussed at a recent meeting of the collegium. (Photo for representational purpose)

EVEN AS it remains locked in a bitter struggle with the Narendra Modi government over delay in appointments to the higher judiciary and a new Memorandum of Procedure (MoP), the Supreme Court collegium is learnt to have begun the process of filling vacant posts in the apex court.

Sources told The Indian Express that the names of seven high court chief justices were discussed at a recent meeting of the collegium. Only four of the five members attended the meeting, while the names were later “circulated” to the fifth member — Justice Jasti Chelameswar.

Watch What Else is Making news

Justice Chelameswar has told Chief Justice of India T S Thakur that he will not attend future meetings of the collegium and the recommendations of the other four judges, including the CJI, should be sent to him “by circulation”. The CJI, according to sources, failed to persuade Justice Chelameswar to do a rethink.

Sources said the four members of the collegium favoured the elevation of Bombay High Court Chief Justice Manjula Chellur, Chattisgarh High Court Chief Justice Deepak Gupta, Jammu & Kashmir High Court Chief Justice N N Paul Vasanthakumar, Gujarat High Court Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy, Rajasthan High Court Chief Justice Navin Sinha, Himachal Pradesh High Court Chief Justice Ahmed Mir and Uttarakhand HC CJ K M Joseph to the Supreme Court.

However, Justice Chelameswar is learnt to have objected to at least one name on the list, and he is reported to have conveyed his views in writing to the remaining members of the collegium.

No final decision has been taken on the names, it is learnt.

While there are six vacancies in the Supreme Court at present, one more judge, Justice A R Dave, is scheduled to retire later this month. Justice Dave is also a member of the collegium. Another vacancy will arise on January 3 next year, when CJI Thakur retires.

Meanwhile, the Centre is yet to clear the collegium’s recommendation to transfer Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice K M Joseph to Andhra Pradesh — the decision has been pending since May. Chief Justice Joseph, who is among those being considered for elevation, headed the HC bench that set aside the Modi government’s decision to impose President’s Rule in Uttarakhand.

Justice Chelameswar, member of the larger collegium, was the lone dissenting judge in the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) case last year, ruling in favour of doing away with the collegium system. The remaining judges had, through a majority judgment, struck down as unconstitutional an amendment to validate the NJAC Act.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. U
    Udit
    Nov 14, 2016 at 2:03 am
    Ch el la me sh war objected to K M Joseph's e l e v a t i o n because K N Joseph is an honest judge and because he set aside the Modi's domestic coup in Uttarkand.
    Reply
    1. U
      Udit
      Nov 14, 2016 at 2:04 am
      Ch el la me sh waris a known lowest rung BJP PARTY WORKER. Imposing party agenda in judiciary.
      Reply
      1. U
        Udit
        Nov 14, 2016 at 2:05 am
        If Joseph were dis-honest, criminal Iyer Bureau(IB) would have had Joseph's records. And using that MODI could have directed IB to get the judgement he wanted in Uttarkand. This on itself a proof that Joseph is honest. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;For a BRAHMIN DOG, like SONU, his NON-existent brahmin ego is important than the country.
        Reply
        1. A
          anunay
          Nov 14, 2016 at 9:40 am
          U r fool.
          Reply
          1. S
            sonu
            Nov 14, 2016 at 1:48 am
            k m joseph and amir are not right choices
            Reply
            1. S
              sonu
              Nov 14, 2016 at 1:42 am
              k m joseph of uk high court shouldn't have been promoted... his image among lawyers is that of a corru@t judge... this shows hoe unethicalthis collegium system has beco
              Reply
              1. S
                sonu
                Nov 14, 2016 at 1:47 am
                modi govt has shown by his action that he is determined to root out corruption.. by indulging in fight and confrontation judiciary specially under thakur doing great disservice to judicial insutions
                Reply
                1. S
                  sonu
                  Nov 14, 2016 at 1:46 am
                  some of the names mentioned in list should not be promoted.. i hope modi govt dont give its consent...colegium is bringing down image of judiciary.. thanx to justice chamleshwaram we still have honest ppl in the system
                  Reply
                  1. V
                    Vinu Koratty
                    Nov 14, 2016 at 2:16 am
                    Collegium is a joke! The quicker we abolish it, the better for a free and fair Judiciary! No wonder we got 500 years worth of cases piled up and pending in our courts...
                    Reply
                    1. N
                      N.V.Rao
                      Nov 14, 2016 at 2:12 am
                      If Joseph's elevation is objected by Chalameshwar, its unfair. Dishonest person is judging honest person.
                      Reply
                      1. P
                        Pais Hilary
                        Nov 14, 2016 at 4:32 am
                        It would be best to have the judiciary under the control of law minister Ravishankar Prasad.
                        Reply
                        1. P
                          Prabhakar Deshpande
                          Nov 14, 2016 at 6:02 am
                          It is wrong to bring cast in comments.Brahmin community has contributed tremendously to country and suffering heavily now because of politics and non unity.It is good for community to think seriously about unity and they should speak with one voice .Otherwise they will be nowhere in future
                          Reply
                          1. V
                            Vihari Naidu
                            Nov 14, 2016 at 4:14 am
                            Don't let the judiciary starve of honest judges. The government is waiting to appoint it's party supporters and compromise the independence of judiciary. Remember if there is a coup by a dictator in the middle east, judiciary is the first victim.
                            Reply
                            1. P
                              pramod
                              Nov 14, 2016 at 3:47 pm
                              What was the criteria? Why the judiciary not open for scrutiny?
                              Reply
                              1. R
                                Roy Aranha
                                Nov 14, 2016 at 6:54 am
                                INDEPENDCENT JUDICIARY AND FREEDOM OF LIBERTY I STEH KEY TO DEMOCRATIC FUNCTIONING NOT DICTATORIAL ACTIONS BY THE GOVT
                                Reply
                                1. S
                                  satya
                                  Nov 14, 2016 at 6:27 am
                                  modi didn't elect himself. How come judges elect themselves.
                                  Reply
                                  1. V
                                    V. Setty
                                    Nov 14, 2016 at 1:10 am
                                    Why should this group of self appointed lawyers have the monopoly on the appointment of supreme court or high court judges? Who scrutinizes this group..who elected them.. this is an insane colonial practice which should no place in a democratic country. Court decisions affect every one, not just the lawyers... elected persons/the government should have power to appoint judges and be held accountable for their actions. lt;br/gt;This is essentially like "insider trading' on the stock market!!lt;br/gt;How does process reflect within the democratic system... except delegate all the powers to an important elite?
                                    Reply
                                    1. F
                                      F.O. Listen
                                      Nov 14, 2016 at 6:47 am
                                      What nonsense
                                      Reply
                                      1. S
                                        Swamy
                                        Nov 14, 2016 at 5:12 am
                                        All branches of power will be in One hand, One Capitalist Dictator who can use Democracy as a tool to impose Dictatorship.No one to question, no one to protest all has to only listen to His Foolish speeches and Mann ki Baat.
                                        Reply
                                        1. Load More Comments