CM Devendra Fadnavis suspends no-confidence motion against NMMC chief Tukaram Mundhe

The ruling Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), the Shiv Sena and the Congress had backed the motion, while Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) corporators had voted against it.

Written by Sandeep Ashar | Mumbai | Published:October 30, 2016 3:28 am
Devendra Fadnavis, NMMC chief,  Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation, NMMC, Tukaram Mundhe, latest news, India news, latest news, Navi Mumbai civic chief Tukaram Mundhe. Narendra Vaskar

Holding that it was against the larger public interest, the Chief Minister has suspended the execution of the no-confidence motion passed by the city’s corporators against Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation’s (NMMC) commissioner Tukaram Mundhe on October 25.

Watch What Else is Making News

The reason: The government if of the opinion that “the motion was against the larger public interest and would work against the financial interest of the civic body”.

Breaking his silence over the row between Mundhe and the corporators, Fadnavis said, “Targeting an officer for doing his duty, exposing irregularities and preventing wrongdoings, was absolutely wrong. If there are communication issues with an official, then he can be made aware of it in a different manner.” While passing the no-confidence motion, the corporators had blamed Mundhe’s “autocratic behaviour” and “the humiliation he meted out to the Mayor and other corporators” as the main reasons for the admission of the motion.

The ruling Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), the Shiv Sena and the Congress had backed the motion, while Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) corporators had voted against it.

Sources close to the Chief Minister said a section in the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (MMC) Act — Section 451 — gives the state government powers to suspend or prohibit the execution of a resolution passed by the municipality if it believes that it could lead to a law and order situation, or was against the larger public interest or could hurt the financial interest of the municipality.

On October 26, Mundhe, who was not permitted to present his side during the general body meeting, had submitted a report to the government where he reportedly gave details on the going-ons in the municipality after he took over six months ago.

After examining the contents of the submission, the Chief Minister-led Urban Development department sought a report from the NMMC municipal secretary seeking minutes and details of the resolution regarding the motion, which has been submitted too.

Formal government orders regarding the motion’s suspension are expected to be issued in a day or two, said top sources. But the Act permits the corporation to represent against the state’s order within a month, following which the state can take a final call on confirming or modifying its order.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. M
    mayur
    Oct 30, 2016 at 6:15 pm
    What about digha illegal constructions case in high court
    Reply
    1. M
      mahendra
      Oct 30, 2016 at 11:52 am
      instead of taking all the elected members ( corporators ) of the nmmc into confidencelt;br/gt;th CM has chosen to take mundhe into confidence. as it is mundhe was egoistic. now with this new power bestowed upon him by the honarable CM he will b all th more revengeful. beware navi mumbaikars ( the residents , the corporators and the nmmc machinary ) opposing him , mundhe is back and this time more revengeous and autocraticlt;br/gt;god bless navi mumbai
      Reply
      1. M
        mahendra
        Oct 30, 2016 at 11:44 am
        yes he is the king of the city. he can definately go against the law and th democracy.lt;br/gt;autocracy wins and democracy loses. the CM s decision has toppled democratic voting.
        Reply
        1. N
          Nisar Ahmad
          Oct 31, 2016 at 4:11 pm
          NMMC Commissioner Mr. Mundhe is doing good job but should not make public suffer because of irregularities committed by the NMMC staff. He must give justice to the citizens by giving due and patient hearing.
          Reply
          1. R
            Rajesh Ruparel
            Nov 1, 2016 at 2:53 am
            very good fadnavis
            Reply
            1. Y
              Yogesh
              Oct 29, 2016 at 10:55 pm
              Good Decision by CM.
              Reply
              1. Load More Comments