CJI urges govt to relieve judiciary of ‘avoidable burden’

The CJI also asked the government to set up a panel, comprising former judges, to decide on whether or not to fight a case against any citizen when the issue could be resolved outside court.

By: PTI | New Delhi | Updated: October 1, 2016 8:58 pm

Chief Justice of India T S Thakur today urged the Law Ministry to devise a mechanism to relieve the judicial system of the “avoidable burden” that arises out of “sheer apathy, indifference or incapacity” of the government and its departments to take certain decisions. The CJI also asked the government to set up a panel, comprising former judges, to decide on whether or not to fight a case against any citizen when the issue could be resolved outside court.

“I would request the Law Minister to devise some mechanism to relieve our judicial system of avoidable burden that comes on us, not because we are not ready to share that burden but because of the sheer apathy or indifference or the incapacity of the government to deal with a situation to take a decision,” the CJI said.

He was speaking at the launch of a theme song for National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) in New Delhi. The NALSA was constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to provide free legal services to the weaker sections of society. The CJI referred to certain “unnecessary” cases which could be screened before reaching the court and could be solved at the administrative level itself. “We are doing justice, isn’t that the government also supposed to do? Why should we force the citizen to go to the court at all. I would request the Government of India to device some mechanism to resolve these issues outside court.

“You can have a panel of former judges with impeccable honesty. Let them decide. Let that panel decide whether the citizen is entitled to that relief. If he is right then why should we force the citizen to be brought to the court.
“Show the will to provide a mechanism for the resolution of conflicts or disputes outside the judicial system and you
will have help from lawyers and judges,” the CJI said.

Watch What Else Is Making News

Minister of Law and Justice Ravi Shankar Prasad, who was also present on the occasion, addressed the inaugural session of ‘National Consultation on Challenges in Mediation and Way Forward’ and proposed the digitalisation of 622 district-level NALSA centres across the country to make them more efficient and effective.

The Law Minister also asked NALSA to extend a helping hand to the victims of acid attacks so that they feel that the legal system and the society is with them. “I would recommend that victims of acid attack should also be taken on a priority basis by framing a special scheme for them,” Prasad added.

Recalling his efforts as a young lawyer for the release of Mohammad Miyan, an undertrial prisoner for 49 years, as the biggest success in his career, the minister batted for ensuring legal assistance to poor. “We must think about how we can provide legal assistance to poor people and undertrials more effectively. Legal assistance to the poor must become a movement,” he said.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. K
    Kabali
    Oct 1, 2016 at 11:15 pm
    What SC says is "we are burdened with high value, national importance cases like Shahabuddin bail case, kushBOOB's pre-marital SEKS cases, PILs from SoBrahMINION Swamy, that rape case, this rape case, Sunanda Pushkar VS Sashi Taroor case, who is SoBrahmMINION Swamy's Father case, Why Brahmins consider him as their real father case,...." lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Too much burden. CJI is true.
    Reply
  2. N
    Neil
    Oct 1, 2016 at 5:37 pm
    So you get paid to do you job but it's a burden.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;If you would focus more on upholding rule of law and delivering justice this would not be the case.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;But current Supreme Court dispensation is acting like executive branch. Their judgement defies legal logic. Case in point Diesel engine ban, enforcing lodha panel recommendation and many more.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Their constant interference in daily administration is breathtaking. Nowhere in the world you will find such encroachment of executive branch.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Our democracy is not of high quality but that does not justify its overreach.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;They demand transparency from government but does not provide what legal reasoning is used to arrive on a judgement or selection of judges.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Collegium is first of its illegal eny in the democratic world where judicial branch has usurped the consutional authority provided to the parliament.
    Reply
  3. S
    Shyamal Ganguly
    Oct 1, 2016 at 11:06 pm
    CJI Thakur is probably a disciple of CATZOO. CATZOO was a CONGI and then changed his tact to be a funny guy.
    Reply
  4. S
    Shyamal Ganguly
    Oct 1, 2016 at 11:04 pm
    I have no faith on this CONGI CJI. He is really a low life - to keep Dayanidhi Maran out of Jail. We just don't know what was the bribe amount.
    Reply