CGDA to Army: Large number of non-fighting corps personnel getting disability pension

Wanted ‘lifestyle diseases’ out of disability ambit; Army rebutted arguments.

Written by Man Aman Singh Chhina | Chandigarh | Published:October 24, 2016 4:32 am
disability pension, army disability pension, disability pension for army, cdga, india news, indian express, Army jawans help a war-disabled serviceman at Western Command HQ in Chandimandir. (Express Archives)

A large number of Army officers belonging to the non-fighting corps have been getting disability medical grading in the period between 2006 to 2014, including a substantial number of medical officers who have been retiring with disability pension.

This was revealed in a letter from Controller General of Defence Accounts (CGDA) to Chief of Army Staff in September 2015 and the contents of which the Army is learnt to have hotly contested in the ongoing debate over disability pension benefits being given to officers. This letter was written after the then Director General Armed Forces Medical Services, Lt Gen BK Chopra wrote to the then Defence Secretary in December 2014 highlighting that large number of Major Generals and Lt Generals were being granted disability pension upon retirement.

Documents accessed by The Indian Express show that the CGDA letter pointed out that an unusually large number of cases of disability in 2016-2014 were of officers of ‘non-fighting corps’ and an equally large number are from medical corps. The letter also recommended that lifestyle diseases should not be connected to military service conditions and should be kept out of the ambit of disability. It also highlighted post of Medical Advisor (Pensions) at Principal Controller Defence Accounts (PCDA) in Allahabad has been discontinued.

Another key issue raised by the CGDA is that the PCDA Allahabad, being the pension sanctioning authority, additional documents should be furnished to establish casual relationship between service conditions and disability. It also raises the issue of conducting medical boards by non-military medical authorities, ie. civilian doctors.

Sources say the Army has forcefully rebutted the CGDA point-by-point. It brought out that the “hard life” led by military personnel resulted in manifestation of disability leading upto retirement. Sources say the Army has brought out that the increase in disability claims was due to increased awareness among defence personnel about government rules and regulations. It has also been explained that the number of officers being disabled is more because the service period of officers is much more than that of a jawan, who retires much early. The suggestion that civilian doctors conduct medical boards for disability was rejected on the grounds that such doctors did not possess any greater knowledge.

Speaking to The Indian Express, Maj Navdeep Singh, an advocate in Punjab and Haryana High Court who has been a member of he Ministry of Defence experts panel, said the (CGDA’s) letter amounted to unnecessary interference in functioning of executive and medical authorities. “It is also contemptuous since the Supreme Court and High Courts have repeatedly held the Defence Accounts Department cannot intervene in such matters and its duty is restricted to ensuring correctness of amounts disbursed,” he said.

Meanwhile, sources say data pertaining to number of defence personnel getting disability pension between 2006-2014 may have been statistically tweaked before the 7th Pay Commission to suit a particular pattern. While the CGDA provided a percentage decrease of disabled personnel from about 19 per cent to 7 per cent in case of personnel other than officers, an increase from 13 per cent to 19 per cent was shown for officers during the period 2007-2014. However, officers concerned with the subject say that the actual percentage in 2014 is approximately 16 per cent for officers and 12.5 per cent for personnel other than officers and the variation is due to a difference in age profile with officers retiring with 15 to 20 years more service than jawans thereby increasing the probability of in-service diseases.

Maj Navdeep Singh said that CGDA’s data is not honest since all old cases who were granted disability pension due to change in policy or on judicial orders during the period 2007 to 2014 were incorrectly included in current data. He adds that many disabled personnel were earlier illegally denied disability benefits due to incorrect policies which were set aside by tribunals and courts thereby leading to an artificial spurt during the period, which is also not unusual, adding that in countries like the US, 22.5 per cent of total soldiers were released with a disability in 2014.

 

 

 

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. B
    Balwinder Kumar,
    Oct 26, 2016 at 10:53 am
    CGDA has rightly pointed out that officers are getting disability for pension for life style and aged ailments which are common. Why Officers are retained beyond the age of 40 years, as the 80% of PBOR get retired from service.
    Reply
    1. M
      Mltr Michael
      Oct 31, 2016 at 2:30 pm
      I m seen many JCO/ORs being granted disability on diseases like High BP, Diabetes which in my opinion does not deserve any benefit. Disability should be given when it is aggravated by military service rather then genetic problem or lifestyle.
      Reply
      1. S
        sp
        Oct 26, 2016 at 7:06 am
        The data (from CGDA or wherever) was cleverly circulated in the media by the government, to justify itself for shifting Disability Pension from percentage system to slab system. This was perhaps done to silence Defence Forces from opposing the new system. If the government has doubts about the claims of disability made by the officers, they can be referred to a fresh medical board.
        Reply
        1. V
          venugopal
          Oct 24, 2016 at 3:12 am
          We shd believe in Army data. But in many pub sector persons with disability during service period alone get the benefit retirement. While active def personnel meaning n direct action may get even last day. the non active shd have drawn it during service period.
          Reply
          1. R
            Ramesh Gautam
            Oct 24, 2016 at 4:13 pm
            CGDA, No less a villain to add to the woos of our Army.
            Reply
            1. R
              Ramapati Sahana
              Oct 24, 2016 at 5:47 am
              Shame that in-spite of looking into the root cause .. diminishing or less longevity of a veteran compared to civilian counterpart due hard life style , accentuated tensed w/o family work life , inability to develop skillset for next life / employment , tremendous financial stress for not able to support family directly and many such .. these babus are twisting the figures to present a distorted picture.lt;br/gt;If the regulations/ law or standard for low category are same for civilians too .. where is the gap .. are they now accusing the Defense Medical Doctors ? So the solution now is to go to Mr clean civilian doctors / Mr Clean babus and Mr Clean politicians . So if accidents happen on the road .. solution is band the cars/ transports.. God bless.
              Reply
              1. R
                Ramapati Sahana
                Oct 24, 2016 at 5:54 pm
                CGDA is doing this on behest of whom .. gesslt;br/gt;They don't have balls .. its all part of mive and unionized game plan
                Reply
                1. S
                  Santy
                  Oct 26, 2016 at 5:04 pm
                  Looks more like personal vendetta!!!!!!!!
                  Reply
                  1. S
                    S b
                    Oct 25, 2016 at 12:09 pm
                    We feel shame on the openion cgda , cgda is a BAKLOL, who appt as CGDA , ,Peon knoledge is better than CGDA, I am openly challenge to GCDA on the matter, Time place can fixed by CGDA, Hav SB Tiwari ex man
                    Reply
                    1. S
                      Selvan Kn
                      Oct 25, 2016 at 1:34 pm
                      First ask CGDA what does it mean by fighting and non-fighting force? then ask them, what makes a home?, a father or a mother or both or anybody else in-between? If they will be able to answer this question there won't be any more question of them interfering with the term called Defence Disability rather focus on their job quiet .Also, for life even they need no up gradation study for managing their accounts, right? If they are unable to answer, then snatch their job and outsource it.
                      Reply
                      1. S
                        Ssr namana
                        Oct 24, 2016 at 2:24 pm
                        There are some anti army elements who wants to demoralise the Armed Forces. The non fighting force also serves in the difficult terrain and maintain the logistics. Do the so called CGDA staff or others who raised this issue go and do the job.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Please do no pull the wire till it break.
                        Reply
                        1. Load More Comments