Modi marital status row: Offence committed but FIR cannot be filed now

Modi disclosed his marital status for the first time in the affidavit he swore while filing his nomination for Vadodara Lok Sabha seat.

By: PTI | Ahmedabad | Updated: June 30, 2014 6:12 pm
CrPC section 468 prescribes limitations to non-serious cases where the imprisonment term does not exceed three years. "No court shall take cognizance of an offence of the category after the expiry of the period of limitation," reads section 468 of CrPC. Source:  AP CrPC section 468 prescribes limitations to non-serious cases where the imprisonment term does not exceed three years. “No court shall take cognizance of an offence of the category after the expiry of the period of limitation,” reads section 468 of CrPC. Source: AP

An Ahmedabad court on Monday held that though Narendra Modi had committed an offence under RP Act by not disclosing his marital status while contesting Assembly polls in 2012, a petition seeking registration of an FIR against him cannot be entertained due to a time-bar prescribed for such cases.

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate M M Sheikh of Ahmedabad (rural) court passed an order to this effect while disposing of an application by an AAP leader Nishant Verma which sought FIR to be registered against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for “hiding” his marital status in the affidavit he had filed with his nomination in 2012.

The court said “an offence is committed under section 125(A)(3) of Representation of People (RP) Act by not disclosing facts” about Modi’s marital status.

Section 125-A(3) of RP Act deals with penalty for concealing information while filing affidavit and provides for imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months.

The court, however, said as per CrPC section 468(2)(B), the complaint for the offence has to be made within one year in cases related to the violation of section 125(A)(3) of the RP Act.

As the complaint was submitted after a year and four months of alleged offence “cognizance of complaint cannot be taken and an FIR can not be lodged now”, the court said.

CrPC section 468 prescribes limitations to non-serious cases where the imprisonment term does not exceed three years. “No court shall take cognizance of an offence of the category after the expiry of the period of limitation,” reads section 468 of CrPC.

Section 468(2)(B) limits the period to one year for filing complaints for an offence that is punishable with a term not exceeding one year. Violation of section 125(A) of RP Act attracts a maximum penalty of six months.

Verma had knocked the court’s door in April this year after Ranip police station authorities turned down his request to register an FIR against Modi for “hiding” facts about his marital status in his 2012 affidavit.

He had also sought action against the Returning Officer of Maninagar Assembly constituency P K Jedeja for accepting the affidavit at that time.

Modi disclosed his marital status and the name of his wife Jashodaben for the first time in the affidavit he swore while filing his nomination for Vadodara Lok Sabha seat this year.

He earlier used to leave the column relating to the spouse blank while contesting Assembly elections in Gujarat.

Verma’s counsel said they would challenge the order in a the Supreme Court.

“We will challenge the verdict. Even the court has said an offence was committed by Modi. Since we filed the application after specific time limit, our plea was rejected. Now, we are thinking of filing an application in the Supreme Court,” Verma’s counsel K R Koshti said.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

First Published on: June 30, 2014 5:58 pm
  1. V
    Vivek kumar
    Jun 30, 2014 at 3:41 pm
    MM Sheikhji everyone knows about his "wife" since 2002.
    Reply
    1. J
      Jagdish Jain
      Jun 30, 2014 at 9:33 pm
      Obviously, India is not a country of the rule of law; serious crimes like abandoning one's wife and hiding the fact of one's marital status in one's affidavits; but no punishment given to such individuals. Maybe the reason is that affidavit is a foreign concept: most Indians, including Modi, don't understand what an affidavit is.
      Reply
      1. N
        namo
        Jul 3, 2014 at 12:40 pm
        AAP talking about mental maturity haha
        Reply
        1. P
          Prashant
          Jul 1, 2014 at 12:12 pm
          Have seen a lot of sheep, but u r d one man. Laying ur head down like BHED in Modi's support. Think BHED, think and then support. No one is objecting ur support, but ur mental immaturity.
          Reply
          1. M
            Mahisasur Mardini
            Jun 30, 2014 at 3:29 pm
            really really fed up of the commies - why don't they crawl back under the rock they came from
            Reply
            1. R
              Rajesh Yadav
              Jul 1, 2014 at 1:33 pm
              I believe government and courts need to stay out of its citizens personal life. This case should have been considered by court only if his wife approached the court. They need to remove cast, religion, martial status, and education questions from almost all applications, it really does not matter and does not affect ones ability to lead or represents folks. Martial status should only matter for taxation purposes.
              Reply
              1. R
                Rock Smith
                Jun 30, 2014 at 4:37 pm
                Just let it go AAP and focus your energy in Delhi election rather than indulging in cheap tactics as it does not make any difference.
                Reply
                1. Load More Comments