Govt ban puts question mark over blindness prevention programme

Dr Bonfield is on her first review tour of India since the grant was approved.

Written by Abantika Ghosh | New Delhi | Updated: April 29, 2017 8:36 am
PHFI, blindness prevention programme, blindness prevention, diabetes patient, blind foreign funding, foreign funding, Dr Bonfield, Public Health Foundation of India, Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust, indian express news, india news Treatment is given in the medical college or the teaching hospital. (Representational image)

The government’s move to bar Public Health Foundation of India from accepting foreign funding has put a question mark on two blindness prevention programmes that PHFI was implementing in partnership with the Ministry of Health and state health departments.

The four-year programmes for diabetic retinopathy (blindness caused by diabetes) and retinopathy of prematurity (blindness in premature babies because of overexposure to oxygen inside incubators) were supported by the Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust of UK through a £7 million grant, of which £4.3 million has been paid. But the rest cannot be processed because of the restrictions on PHFI.

Speaking to The Indian Express, chief executive of the trust, Dr Astrid Bonfield, said: “It was very impressive to see that the programme has been integrated into the national governme’t’s health system because unless that was done, there was no point really. It (the support) will continue for the next two years. I would not like to talk about Indian government business but at the moment, clearly, there are no payments being made (to PHFI).”

Dr Bonfield is on her first review tour of India since the grant was approved.

Ironically, one of the reasons why PHFI was selected, she says, was because of its excellent links with the government; the grant was approved during the previous UPA regime.

With an estimated 69.2 million diabetes patients in India, ballpark estimates suggest that if the proportion of diabetics whose sight is threatened remains constant, an additional 10 million would be added by 2035.

As more premature babies survive in middle income countries like India, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) remains a condition about which awareness levels are low. A 2015 study published in the journal Indian Paediatrics found incidence in premature babies to be as high as 44 per cent.

Sources say work on the two programmes are in “suspended animation” not just because fresh funds cannot come in but also due to the curbs placed on PHFI by the Ministry of Home Affairs from accepting foreign contribution with retrospective effect for alleged violation of norms. There is no clarity on whether funds that have already come in can be spent, they said.

The Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust was set up in 2011 at the Commonwealth heads of government meeting as a five-year charitable programme. The target in India was to integrate eyecare for people living with diabetes and newborns. India was the only country where ROP was taken up while the project to prevent blindness due to diabetes (DR) was taken up in 13 countries.

The DR project is currently under implementation across ten states spearheaded by a task force set up by the health ministry in 2014 and headed by deputy commissioner in the ministry, Dr Damodar Bachani. Its first meeting was held in July that year. It has representation from both government and non-government sectors. The district level models are pilots that are expected to be scaled up across states.

Following the national ROP summit in October 2013, a national task force headed by a joint secretary was constituted by the health ministry. Using the government of India database, 10 states, where sick newborn care units (SNCUs) had been functioning for at least two years, were identified for the programme.

The ROP prevention model includes a cluster of one medical college or teaching hospital and three-five district hospitals. Screening for retinopathy happens in SNCUs of these hospitals on a fixed day in a week. Treatment is given in the medical college or the teaching hospital.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    Sarma
    Apr 29, 2017 at 12:46 pm
    Tendentious reportage. The reader has the right to know the Government's view in the same report. This never happens whenever the IE Subs show enthusiasm in p ing pieces, editing articles or formulating Headlines in tune with the IE policy of Put Down BJP or Pull Down the Hindu. I hope the Editor realises that people are laughing at him in today's India
    Reply
    1. I
      Ivan
      Apr 29, 2017 at 1:09 pm
      Can you just o f f ? What has providing services to the blind or near blind have to do with any kind of agenda, you b l o o d y s c u m ?
      Reply
      1. S
        Sarma
        Apr 29, 2017 at 1:25 pm
        Please Editor read my comment band read Ivan's. My point cannot be more forcefully rxpressef
    2. A
      anon
      Apr 29, 2017 at 11:51 am
      Government of illiterates bigoted zealots
      Reply
      1. P
        Peter Aleff
        Apr 29, 2017 at 11:26 am
        The blinding of premature babies from retinopathy of prematurity can be prevented easily without special government funds, simply by stopping the overexposure of those babies' still developing and therefore extremely vulnerable retinae to the "blue-light-hazard" from the fluorescent lamps in the typical intensive care nursery. See my clinical article "Baby-blinding retinopathy of prematurity and intensive care nursery lighting" posted on the pages beginning at : retinopathyofprematurity /Babyblindinglights01.htm, and the discussion of the context for this continued blinding at : retinopathyofprematurity /01summary.htm. Using the common sense advocated in those papers can stop the epidemic of baby-blinding, without the need for additional funding.
        Reply
        1. V
          Vinod
          Apr 29, 2017 at 11:20 am
          It is quite intriguing to note how the government of India treats non government sector rendering yeomen services in areas where government functionaries are either unwilling or unable reach. While I agree that all government as well as non government functionaries need to comply with the laws of the land, there is need to leave some space for non government functionaries to do course correction. Summarily terminating their services which benefit a large number of people in the country should not be forgotten by the government in its undue phaste to portray itself as the champion of propriety. Thousands of NGOs have lost FCRA registration with a stroke of pen of the HM. But does it think what consequences it brought on the ground? Millions of people have lost their jobs in NGOs that were employing them for social development programmes however imperfect they might be. If the government could fill in the employment vacuum created by it's action on NGOs then it may have some merits.
          Reply
          1. T
            Thomas
            Apr 29, 2017 at 10:49 am
            Are you seeking for an opportunity to sell your kidney for money due to financial break down and we shall offer you $450,000,00 USD for your Kidney. My name is Dr. Patrick Thomas, Please call or Whatsapp 919500338353 for more detains.
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments