• Associate Sponsor

IIT JEE (Advanced) 2015 results out, Satvat Jagwani of Madhya Pradesh tops exam

According to the statistics released by IIT-Bombay, 26, 456 candidates qualified for admission to IITs and NITs. Satvat Jagwani from Satna, Madhya Pradesh topped the exam scoring 469.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Updated: June 18, 2015 6:39 am
iit jee, iit results, iit, iit jee results The HRD ministry has maintained that the arrangement is “illegal” and violates IIT Act.

The results for the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) Advanced 2015 was declared on Thursday. According to the statistics released by IIT-Bombay, 26, 456 candidates qualified for admission to IITs and NITs. Satvat Jagwani from Satna, Madhya Pradesh topped the exam scoring 469.

See the complete list of IIT JEE (Advanced) result

The All India Rank (AIR) and Category Rank for JEE (Advanced) 2015 is available online on the official webiste jeeadv.iitb.ac.in.

iit advanceAdmission to various courses, including B. Tech, B.E and B. Arch in 20 IITs and Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad will depend on the JEE rank. Of the 20 IITs, four – in Tirupati, Goa, Palakkad and Raipur – will be functional from 2015-16 session.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    sri ram
    Apr 15, 2016 at 9:00 am
    andhra pradesh r the toppers
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. A
      aa
      Jun 17, 2015 at 10:33 pm
      FYI: Satvat Jagwani is not a girl.
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. M
        MichaekMichael Jackson
        Jun 18, 2015 at 7:13 am
        Proud to be from Madhya Pradesh . 5 out of 10 belong to MP. Cheers
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. A
          Anshu Verma
          Jun 20, 2015 at 2:31 am
          Please change the URL data: "iit-jee-advanced-2015-results-out-mp-girl-satvat-jagwani-tops-exam"
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. B
            B. SRIDHAR
            Jun 18, 2015 at 11:28 am
            Congrats to all the toppers and especially to SATVAT for having made MP proud!
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments