Defence services put forth grievances before the anomalies committee of 7 CPC

The views of the three services have been entertained by the committee in complaince with the interim directions of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in a writ petition filed by a serving officer, Col Preet Pal Singh Grewal.

Written by Man Aman Singh Chhina | Chandigarh | Published:February 14, 2017 10:35 pm

The anomaly committee on allowances constituted for the 7th Central Pay Commission (7th CPC) has provided a direct hearing to the defence services for their grievances related to allowances recommended by the Pay Commission. This is probably the first time when an opportunity of hearing has been provided to the defence establishment by an anomaly committee. Sources say the hearing was provided recently by the Committee in a positive backdrop and the views of the defence services were fully supported by the Ministry of Defence.

The views of the three services have been entertained by the committee in compliance with the interim directions of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in a writ petition filed by a serving officer, Col Preet Pal Singh Grewal.

MoD sources also point out that many issues affecting allowances of defence services were placed before the committee including the discriminatory hardship allowances wherein an IPS officer was eligible for approximately Rs 55,000 as hardship allowance in Leh, his military counterpart was entitled only for about Rs 10,000.

Similarly while the civil servants were entitled to the same amount of 55,000 in Shillong, the defence officers were denied any allowance in that area. It was also pointed out to the committee that while many beneficial military allowances were extended to the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) over the years, the same reciprocity was not shown to the defence services when allowances admissible to CAPFs were found more beneficial.

It was stated that while many organisations such as the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Rapid Action Force (RAF) and National Investigation Agency (NIA) were paid allowances calculated on percentage of pay, the defence services were paid at fixed slabs.

The committee was also informed that while the 7th CPC had favoured providing House Rent Allowance to personnel other than commissioned officers staying at barracks due to functional/administrative requirements, the same was not extended to commissioned officers forced to stay in Officers’ Mess premises due to similar reasons.

The high court had directed the consideration of grievances of the defence services by the anomaly committee on the prayer of the officer who had said in his petition that the views of all stakeholders must be heard before submission of the report. He had pointed out that while civilian establishments were being provided the opportunity to present their cases before the anomaly committee, the said process was not being followed for the defence services.

The Colonel had petitioned that since the armed forces were prohibited from forming associations, it was important to provide an alternative institutional mechanism where the defence establishment could put across their views for resolution of such anomalies.

Sources say that while the Anomaly Committee had more or less finished its job, the report would probably be submitted after elections to the five states have been completed.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. K
    K.N.Poduval
    Jun 9, 2017 at 7:28 pm
    GREF/BRO is an integral part of the armed forces as per Presidential notification.Honorable Supreme court opined"But, we may observe that in case it is found that the terms and conditions of service of officers and men in GREF directly recruited or taken on de tion are in any way less favorable than those of Army personnel appointed to the same or equivalent posts in GREF, the Central Government might well consider the advisability of taking steps for ensuring that the disparity, if any, between the terms and conditions of service, such as, ry, allowances, rations etc. of Army personnel posted in GREF units and other officers and men in GREF is removed".This order dates back 1983.Particularly in the case of retired GREF personnel Government is yet to take action on this We solicit early action on the subject.
    Reply
    1. A
      Anil
      Feb 17, 2017 at 2:51 pm
      No body is talking about jawan of defence forces. Officers have become so selfish they r only demanding undue demand whereas for jawan who r forced to quit at early stage of life from job paid so less he even can't fill his bread and butter after discharge. Same on officer cl. Sayad marne ke Baad ye uper account room book karenge isliye inheritance jyada or jyada ki ichha bash Rahi hai.
      Reply
      1. D
        dharmender
        May 2, 2017 at 2:41 pm
        u r right bro
        Reply
        1. V
          vinod
          May 4, 2017 at 1:26 pm
          become an army officer /IPS officer not a cake walk,,,,, army officer can compare only with IPS counter parts/IAS counterpart,,,, if an ips officer gets 50000 in CI op area,,, why can't an army officer, ,,,,a police constable also gets more allowance than an army officer,,,,, means if officer (army) gets same as IPS then jawan (army) be naturally gets good allce as compared,,,,,
          Reply
        2. A
          Athul V+Dev
          Feb 21, 2017 at 5:28 pm
          Dost harry , please just explain any ome anomality reported for jawans.
          Reply
          1. B
            Bal Raj
            Feb 15, 2017 at 2:56 pm
            What a bloody shame that an army man has to approach court to have his voice heard by a committee deciding his pay!
            Reply
            1. K
              Krishnan
              Feb 15, 2017 at 8:09 am
              I don't agree, I'm not pro BJP if at all OROP PARIKAR SEEMS To be good defence minister
              Reply
              1. K
                Krishnan
                Feb 15, 2017 at 8:11 am
                Sorry lot of things the present government have done
                Reply
                1. H
                  Harry
                  Feb 20, 2017 at 6:02 am
                  Dost Anil, The anomalies are reported for both Officers and jawans.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt; Its just that the media by act of omission/ commission reports issues pertaining to officers only.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Lets stop this officers vs jawans thing!!!!!.Jawans do not exist without officers and similarly no officer can exist without jawans.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;I just hope and pray the govt does announce some thing soon.
                  Reply
                  1. V
                    Venkataraman Jagadesan
                    Feb 14, 2017 at 5:43 pm
                    Good and Thanks to the present Govt: under Mr Modi. These were never heard off during Mr Moun andco. Jai Hind.
                    Reply
                    1. Load More Comments