‘Kuch dalal aaye the… later, I found that mantriji bought the land’

Farmer who sold plot had donated the same land to government under the daan scheme

Written by Dipankar Ghose | Jalki(mahasamund) | Updated: August 1, 2017 10:31 am
chhattisgarh, forest land to build resort, chhattisgarh forest dept, indian express Home of Vishnu Sahu who donated his land to govt and then sold it.

Like the walls of the home he lives in, 64-year-old Vishnu Ram Sahu is crumbling. On a cot in his bedraggled house, he sits without a shirt, a pain in his knees, and ailments in his kidneys. He has fallen on bad times, he says. And he traces the beginning of the decline to 23 years ago, when he gave up 4.12 hectares as “daan” to the then Madhya Pradesh Water Resources (WRD) department, that has now become the centrepiece in allegations of impropriety and conflict of interest of a powerful Chhattisgarh minister and his family.

In 1994, Sahu says, WRD officers visited him asking for his land. “They told me that a government project would come up on the land. And they promised that the department that would acquire the land would give me and my family members jobs in lieu of the land taken. I was adamant about sending my children to school and all of them wanted service jobs, and not be stuck in the village farming. So I agreed. They gave us no promise of the jobs in writing and I signed the papers for the daan of my land. Unki baaton mein aa gaya,” Sahu said.

For years, Sahu said he waited, but no project came up, and no jobs were given. “They went back on their promise, and nothing happened. I kept paying all the lagaan on the land for years. Why should I not consider it mine?,” he said. Despite government records showing that Rs 22.90 lakh was spent on afforestation and the building of cattle protection trenches after the land was transferred by Water to the Forest Department, Sahu says not one sapling was sown. “Last year, some forest officials came and a panchayat was held asking if trees had been planted. In front of everyone, I said nothing had happened,” Sahu said.

Then in 2009, even as Sahu considered the land his own, there was another knock on his door. By this time, problems had begun to mount. The eldest of three brothers, with four children each, there were marriages to conduct, and illnesses to take care of. He says he needed the money. “Kuch dalal (middlemen) log aaye the. They said they would buy the land from me and because the revenue records hadn’t changed, I sold it,” he said. Also Read | Wife’s land: Chhattisgarh Minister says didn’t know status, records say otherwise Click here

Sahu who continues to farm on the three acres he still owns, says, initially, he wasn’t aware who the real buyer of his land was. “It was only later that I found out that ‘mantriji’ had bought the land. Now it has been cordoned off and buildings inside are coming up on it,” he said.

About 500 m away, lining the main road, is a big gate, adorned with bamboo, complete with bronze metal carvings of leaves. Next to the gate is a green glass guard room. There is no name on the gate and the wall, with the carvings, with a small grass patch fenced off above it continues to another gate that is shut. To the right of the gate, where the wall turns, another concrete wall, with barbed wire to prevent any entry stretches out into the adjacent fields. The green room is manned by one person, suspicious and guarded. “Why are you here? Samaan leke aaye ho kya,” he asks. He refuses to be identified, and says he does not know what the plot is. Just inside the gate, a metalled road leads inside, with manicured trees along the side. There are concrete structures visible in the distance, large swathes of grass and evidence of ongoing construction in the distance.

The scheme under which Sahu gave the land to the government is under provisions set out by the Madhya Pradesh “bhu-rajasva” (land revenue) Act, 1959. The idea behind the concept of “daan” or “tyag” was that landowners could donate land to any government department, without anything in return, “for public good.” The Act continues to apply in Chhattisgarh to this day, with the state being carved out of Madhya Pradesh in the year 2000.

The act states that any landowner can donate their land, or parts of their land to any department of the government, after notifying the tehsildar with thirty days notice. The transfer of land requires two witnesses, after which the tehsildar is authorised to clear the transfer with no additional costs of change in the land records or stamp duty applying to the transaction.

A senior Chhattisgarh government official said, “The idea was that people could donate land to the government for public good, so that infrastructure could be built on it. The entire concept of the donation of land was that nothing was given in return. However, in most cases, people gave up parts of their land, so that infrastructure could be built around it, and the value of their remaining property would go up.”

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Adarsh Jalan
    Jul 25, 2017 at 5:10 pm
    I guess we jump to conclusion without even going through the article properly, The Madhya Pradesh Water Resources (WRD) department people took over the land in 1994 . Digvijay Singh was the CM of undivided Madhya Pradesh (1993-2003) . 22.90 lacs were spent over the years , as per the govt records , while nothing was done on the ground. Then in 2009 , he allegedly "SOLD" the land through some dalal (middleman) to a NETA. He is not complaining about the compensation he received . Neither did he complain that the land was forcibly taken over. His only concern was that the buyer was a NETA. Big deal !! So which party's corruption has come to the front . Congress who took over the land and did nothing but siphoned lacs or the so called powerful neta who bought the land after paying a price. The source of fund of the neta can always be verified and enquired upon. BUT it should not be a benaami property. else strict action to be taken against the corrupt neta.
    Reply
    1. V
      vishwanath
      Jul 25, 2017 at 2:27 pm
      The Poor man with big heart he gave a piece of Land for development of state. But see the result of Modi bhakts not even single comment on this. The most corrupted party BJP, the and congress looted government missionary. BJP looted the poor man and common people. So I called BJP highly corrupted party. We will show them in 2019 let us join all common people throw-out this party it is virus. They will kill our society.
      Reply
      1. P
        Prem Kumar Gutty
        Jul 25, 2017 at 3:43 pm
        In 1994 thee was Congress Govt in MP.
        Reply
        1. A
          Adarsh Jalan
          Jul 25, 2017 at 5:13 pm
          please read the article properly before jumping to any conclusion
          Reply
        2. P
          Parth Garg
          Jul 25, 2017 at 2:03 pm
          Everything is fair in BJP politics. Long live Party with a Difference!
          Reply
          1. O
            Onkar Singh
            Jul 25, 2017 at 12:44 pm
            Isn't this Corruption in a BJP ruled state and the Mantriji is involved in a land scam, mind you this mantriji is from the party which takes pride in being Deshbhakts! So looting is part of Deshbhakti?
            Reply
            1. A
              ASHOK
              Jul 25, 2017 at 10:50 am
              Chhattisgarh minister’s wife buys state forest land to build a resort, his dept says we can do nothing
              Reply
              1. M
                Manas Sarkar
                Jul 25, 2017 at 10:33 am
                Earlier Jaminders used to looted poor people, now our ministers are doing that job.
                Reply
                1. A
                  Amrita
                  Jul 25, 2017 at 10:31 am
                  Why can't the CM of Chattisgarh investigate and nullify the deal? And do away with the daan scheme while you are abt it this day and age with a vigilant public, media and judiciary this should not happen. Will the Centre act ?
                  Reply
                  1. S
                    SK
                    Jul 25, 2017 at 6:37 am
                    Looks like no one is reading such news but only about khans and Katrina's
                    Reply
                    1. M
                      Manzoor
                      Jul 25, 2017 at 12:52 pm
                      No bhakts are silent that's why very few responses.
                      Reply
                    2. Load More Comments