Off with Gandhi statue by legendary sculptor, it’s distorted: Assam

Sculpted by Ram Kinkar Baij and unveiled by then Assam chief minister Bishnu Ram Medhi (who later became Madras governor) on October 2, 1970, the Gandhi statue stands in the garden of the Gandhi Mandap atop the 200-metre Sarania Hill in the heart of Guwahati.

Written by Samudra Gupta Kashyap , Esha Roy , Vandana Kalra | Guwahati | Updated: August 9, 2017 5:31 am
Gandhi statue, ram kinkar baij, assam gandhi statue, gandhi mandap garden, mahatma gandhi statue Statute of Mahatma Gandhi at Gandhi Mandap in Guwahati. (Source: Express photo by Dasarath Deka)

IN A move that has been described by artists and critics as “shocking” and “a criminal act”, officials in Assam have decided to “replace” a statue in Guwahati of Mahatma Gandhi created by one of India’s finest sculptors, Ramkinkar Baij, because it presented a “distorted image”.The decision by Kamrup (Metropolitan) district officials was stated in a resolution taken at a meeting in Guwahati Monday: “The statue of Mahatma Gandhi, which was sculpted long back, gives a distorted image of Mahatma Gandhi. Therefore, (this) meeting has decided to sculpt another statue and replace the old one.” BJP MLA from Guwahati (East), Siddhartha Bhattacharyya, who attended the meeting, told The Indian Express: “Look at the statue. Look at the disproportionate hands and feet. They do not resemble those of the Mahatma in any manner. His face is distorted, as also the pair of glasses. That is why we have decided to dismantle it and place a new statue there.”

Asked if he knew who the sculptor was, Bhattacharyya said, “Some people claim it was made by Ramkinkar Baij. I don’t know.”

Speaking to The Indian Express, Prof Swapan Dutta, Acting Vice-Chancellor of Visva-Bharati University in Santiniketan, described the decision as “most unfortunate”. “Ramkinkar Baij is one of the most important artists in contemporary Indian art. I will go as far as to say that there can never be another Ramkinkar. There are sculptures he has made, which we have at Visva-Bharati, of Sujata and Gautam Buddha. These sculptures do not look like Sujata or Gautam Buddha — and that’s the point, it is an interpretation, it is art. There are thousands of pictures and paintings of Mahatma Gandhi all across the country, which look exactly like he did. Art isn’t about looking for similarities,” he said.

Dutta said that a collaborative project between the university and the National Gallery of Modern Art to recast Baij’s works in bronze, to ensure longevity, is in “the final stages”.

Statute of Father of Nation Mahatma Gandhi which is installed in 1970 will be soon replaced by another statute of Mahatma Gandhi after a decision being taken by District administration (Kamrup metro) for the modification of Gandhi Mandap in Guwahati on Tuesday 8th August 2017.Photo-DASARATH DEKA

When contacted, M Angamuthu, the district deputy commissioner who chaired Monday’s meeting said, “I was not aware of the fact that it was a work of Baij.” Renuka Devi Borkataki, ex-MP and former Union minister who attended the meeting as a member of the Mahatma Gandhi & Martyrs Memorial Trust and Gandhi Mandap Trust, said, “I was not aware of who made the statue. As far as I know, it was brought from Kolkata.” The meeting was also attended by Assam Culture Minister Naba Kumar Doley.

Baij, who died in 1980 at the age of 74, started making the statue with concrete in 1968 for the state government but left the work to be completed by his assistants. Unveiled by the then chief minister Bishnu Ram Medhi on October 2, 1970, the statue stands inside the Gandhi Mandap garden atop the Sarania Hill in the heart of Guwahati.

A man trying to read the detail of the Statute of Father of Nation Mahatma Gandhi which is installed in 1970 after a decision being taken by District administration (Kamrup metro) to replaced by another statute of Mahatma Gandhi) for the modification of Gandhi Mandap in Guwahati on Tuesday 8th August 2017.Photo-DASARATH DEKA

On Tuesday, the decision to demolish the statue sparked outrage in the state. Krishna Nath Sarma, one of the few surviving freedom fighters in Assam, said he would draw the attention of the President to this “criminal and anti-national” act. “This is an insult not just to the great sculptor, but also to the Mahatma,” said Sarma, 95.

Guwahati-based veteran artist, Noni Barpujari, said, “As far as I know, they have already placed the order for a new statue. It is shocking and disgusting. It is a priceless work of art. If there has been any distortion, it is because of the government. Successive governments used to whitewash the statue with lime in the early years. Later, they started applying coats of plastic paint four times a year — Independence Day, Republic Day, Gandhi Jayanti and Martyr’s Day.”

Art critic and film-maker Manik Bora, who heads the Heritage Conservation Society of Assam, said, “Very few states would have such a treasure made by Baij, a father figure of contextual modernism. I consider it a criminal act.”

Baij’s art was rooted in Bengal, but he defied most conventions associated with art in the region. Credited with giving India its first public modernist sculpture “Santhal Family” in 1938, Baij’s monumental sculptures of Yaksha and Yakshini stand outside the RBI building in Delhi.

“There is nobody to this day who has equalled Baij in making public iconic works. Several of these are, of course, within Santiniketan. His humanist vision, relationship with the people, the tribals, is exemplary. He was a great modernist artist, able to imbibe the avant-garde modernist legacies that came to Santiniketan at that time,” said artist Vivan Sundaram, who was associated with a theatre production, 409 Ramkinkars, based on Baij. Born to a village barber in Bankura, it was perhaps Baij’s ability to assimilate from his surroundings that defined his oeuvre. If his first lessons in art came from village artisans moulding idols of deities, in the later years he also famously painted backdrops for theatre productions.

But it was in Santiniketan that Baij seamlessly merged Western expressionism with his folk sensibilities. A teacher in the sculpture department at Visva-Bharati, he found a patron in Rabindranath Tagore. Another student at the university years later, the Delhi-based artist Samit Das, recalled how stories related to the master were often discussed on campus. “Tagore was the one who supported him, not everyone appreciated his art at that time. His imagery was different from the ‘usual’ Bengal school,” said Das.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. D
    Dwipen Sarma
    Aug 9, 2017 at 9:37 pm
    A timely story with excellent reporting. Thanks.
    Reply
    1. C
      CH Shako
      Aug 9, 2017 at 8:36 pm
      This is simply BJP playing to the gallery of Assamese people who hates Bengalis..It serves BJP-RSS gang too because there is a co ordinated attempt by RSS to malign and discredit Bengali iden y in every possible way ..to make Bengalis feel miserable..The only sin - Bengal is a non BJP state. These guys do not even know that without Bengal India will be a failed state ruled by fanatics and racists. I am happy to see Assamese people have started destroying themselves now.. Its their loss. Bengal will be fine.
      Reply
      1. P
        Pais Hilary
        Aug 9, 2017 at 2:02 pm
        Quite a few decisions including this one, by the current dispensation and officers under influence, have been foolish and juvenile. This is one of them in a pretty long list. That apart, you have got some of the facts wrong. Bishnu Ram Medhi could not in any case have been the Chief Minister of Assam on October 2, 1970. Medhi was removed as Chief Minister by Nehru in 1955 and then, after some time, sent as Governor of Madras. Mr BP Chaliha became chief minister in Medhi's place.It could be that Medhi did the inauguration of the statue in Guwahati,after his retirement from politics.
        Reply
        1. S
          Shiva Lochan Kalita
          Aug 9, 2017 at 1:25 pm
          From 1957 to November, 1970 the Chief Minister of Assam was Late Bimala Prasad Chaliha. Late Bishnu Ram Medhi was his predecessor.
          Reply
          1. B
            Bayye Lakshmanarao
            Aug 9, 2017 at 1:11 pm
            Very unfortunate it should not disturb the old sculpture as it shows our old artistic way
            Reply
            1. P
              Prahlad
              Aug 9, 2017 at 2:12 pm
              Forget old artistic way. If auctioned it will fetch several million dollars.
              Reply
            2. R
              Rajib
              Aug 9, 2017 at 11:31 am
              What compels the authority to dismantle 47 years old Gandhiji's statue? Why it took so long time to iden y it's distortion? Is there any hidden agenda behind? Regardlessly the statue was made by one of the finest sculptor of that time.our heart trembles when somebody tries to hammer Bapuji.Renovation without hitting basic stature is tolerable.
              Reply
              1. s
                sri.s
                Aug 9, 2017 at 9:36 am
                If you don't like it then send it back to WBengal or Biswabharati Univ. Nobody should demolish a work of Ramkinkar Baij.
                Reply
                1. S
                  Sumesh
                  Aug 9, 2017 at 9:10 am
                  people understand art as it is, it is not about proportionate at all.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments