Appointment of judges: SC collegium clears pending files, 90 names

The age cap, incidentally, is one of the clauses in the draft MoP on which both the Supreme Court collegium and the Centre are on the same page.

Written by Maneesh Chhibber | New Delhi | Updated: April 18, 2017 8:28 am
supreme court, supreme court collegium, sc collegium, high court judges, CJI, chief justice, india news, indian express The Supreme Court. (File Photo)

The Supreme Court collegium has cleared “every pending file” on appointments to higher judiciary. The names cleared by the collegium include lawyers and judicial officers. Sources said the collegium headed by Chief Justice of India J S Khehar held day-to-day sittings and cleared 90-odd names from among the pending names, while rejecting almost 40 per cent of the total names recommended by collegiums of various high courts, almost all of them for reasons of lack of integrity.

Names cleared include those recommended by high court collegiums as well as names previously cleared by the Supreme Court collegium but returned by the Centre for different reasons, including Intelligence Bureau (IB) inputs on the unsuitability of candidates.

Another important feature of the latest Supreme Court recommendation is that though the government is yet to take a final call on contentious clauses in the new Memorandum of Procedure (MoP), the collegium has gone by the new MoP — as settled by the five-judge collegium sometime ago.

While the old MoP had no age criterion for appointments to higher judiciary, the collegium has gone by its unanimous recommendation to not recommend a lawyer below the age of 45 and above the age of 55 for appointment as judge of a high court. Similarly, in the case of pending names for elevation of district and sessions judges to high court benches, the collegium has gone by the maximum age cap of 58 and half years.

The age cap, incidentally, is one of the clauses in the draft MoP on which both the Supreme Court collegium and the Centre are on the same page.

As first reported by The Indian Express, the Supreme Court collegium, in its final meeting on March 10 on the issue of MoP, rejected every contentious clause that the government wanted included in the MoP, including the one that would have granted the government power to reject any name for appointment as a judge of the high court for reasons of “national security”.

In his letter to the Centre on March 13, conveying the collegium’s unanimous views, CJI Khehar had also said that these were the final views of the collegium in line with the judgment of the Supreme Court in the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) case.

“While deciding the names, the collegium seems to have followed a new rulebook — drawn by itself. In cases where the IB gave adverse inputs about the integrity of candidates, the collegium rejected the names. But in cases where the IB commented on the professional capability of the candidates, the SC collegium overlooked the inputs. The inference that can be drawn is that judges are better placed to know about the legal acumen of candidates than IB officers,” a source said.

Within days of sending back the “final” draft of the new MoP to the government, the SC collegium started the process of clearing pending cases, first sending 43 names to the government for processing, followed by another batch comprising about 45 names. It is learnt that the government has already started processing some of the names that were part of the first bunch.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. I
    indiatop
    Apr 18, 2017 at 9:55 am
    ------------------NEWS ALERT : Dear Fellow indians It has come to notice that underworld with use of bollywood wants to spread riots in India. For example Sonu nigam complaining about azaan. The underworld chhota shakel dawood goons are very active in bollywood. They are using proxy to spread riots which may help if god forbid Indian stan war breaks out. SO DEAR BROTHERS AND SISTERS ................STAY UNITED AND STAY STRONG. dont give in to social media controversy. Raise your doubt about intention of who says what at what time and who will benefit. SHARE THIS AS MUCH AS पॉसिबल...............................शेयर please
    Reply
    1. G
      Gangu Radhakishan
      Apr 18, 2017 at 6:41 am
      In our society across India many issues were settled out of court with the involvement of, may be village elders or leaders in the caste or political leaders and in some cases mafia dons etc.. But those decisions are implemented within the shortest possible time. In one way our Judiciary is taking lot of time and it is like injustice is done in a different way for the right persons/party. May be the judges should be in touch with the official machinery and the party after the judgement is delivered to make sure that the judgement is implemented in true spirit. This will make our judiciary to go to new heights of excellence. Such nice atmosphere should be created to witness sacredness and to rely on Judiciary.
      Reply
      1. N
        Niladrinath Mohanty
        Apr 18, 2017 at 9:04 am
        Lalu Yadav has derived maximum benefit of judicial delay.
        Reply