Alwar lynching: Clean chit to all six accused named by Pehlu Khan in dying declaration

Pehlu Khan, in his statement to police, had named six people among those who had attacked him. However, Alwar SP Rahul Prakash said that a reward of Rs 5,000 announced on each of the six accused was withdrawn as an investigation found them not guilty.

By: Express News Service | Jaipur | Updated: September 14, 2017 4:10 pm
Alwar lynching, pehlu khan, pehlu khan death, pehlu khan murder, pehlu khan Alwar lynching, gau rakshaks, cow vigilance, rajasthan police, mob lynching, india news, indian express news Video grab shows the attack on dairy farmer Pehlu Khan in Alwar district on April 1. (File photo)

An investigation by Rajasthan police found the six persons named by Pehlu Khan before dying as not guilty. Pehlu Khan, 55, and others were allegedly attacked by gau rakshaks in Alwar on April 1 while they were on their way to Haryana after purchasing cattle in Rajasthan. Khan, a dairy farmer, succumbed to his injuries two days later.

In his statement to police, Khan had named Hukum Chand, Navin Sharma, Jagmal Yadav, Om Prakash, Sudheer and Rahul Saini among those who had attacked him.

However, Alwar Superintendent of Police Rahul Prakash on Thursday said that a reward of Rs 5,000 announced on each of the six accused was withdrawn as an investigation found them not guilty.

“We have withdrawn the reward against the six persons after an investigation by CB-CID into their role,” Prakash told The Indian Express. Rajasthan CB-CID has been investigating the case ever since it was transferred to them from Alwar police in July.

The CB-CID recently sent a report to Alwar police recommending the removal of names of six accused from the case as they were found “not guilty” after an investigation, which included statements of policemen and employees of a gaushala. The call detail records of the six men further strengthened their case about their location.

“This is betrayal. We heard the names (of the accused) too. We will seek an inquiry again,” said Pehlu’s son Irshad, who was with him during the assault. Police had arrested seven others, five of whom have been granted bail so far. The case against them will continue.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Rohit Suri
    Sep 17, 2017 at 11:08 am
    Bloody rapist hindus let free once again - These hindus should be exterminated from earth - multuply like rats everywhere poor filthy race bloody rapists - These poor filthy hindus should be pushed out of all muslim countries where they go to earn money like rats. These clean chit hindus will again do terrorism in other places again. should be exterminated to save humanity
    (1)(0)
    Reply
    1. J
      J Tharakan
      Sep 15, 2017 at 8:28 pm
      The best medicine for this cow boys are the treatment Tamil people gave them. These fanatic talibanic cow boys have no problem when hundreds of children died without getting oxygen, but they are concerned only with Go matha.. If this is the Police in Rajasthan, no wonder how criminals dare to rape a 6 year old child.
      (0)(1)
      Reply
      1. I
        iforf
        Sep 15, 2017 at 11:31 am
        this ageold pelhi khan terrorist blown himself to blame hindus.
        (2)(2)
        Reply
        1. I
          islam for fools people one eath
          Sep 15, 2017 at 11:29 am
          good work if you kill bloody islamic muslim in india its mean that you killed one future terrorist and saved country from mujahidee,muslims should be killed like myanmar isreal so that entire population should be wiped out.
          (3)(2)
          Reply
          1. A
            Alak
            Sep 15, 2017 at 11:00 am
            The only part of the investigation Rajasthan police did not mention is " Pehlu Khan has killed himself to blame Bhagats and for that he should be tried even after death. There are a number of policemen and Bhagats who are the witness to it." Why police report left it needs another impartial investigation. Hope any future investigation by Rajasthan Govt. report will mention this part.
            (1)(3)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments