2G verdict: No officer wants to decide out of fear, says former Telecom Secy

Behura joined Department of Telecommunications (DoT) in Ministry of Communications & Information Technology as Secretary (Telecom) on Jan 1, 2008, almost eight months after A Raja took over as Telecom minister.

Written by Sandeep Singh | New Delhi | Updated: December 28, 2017 12:06 pm
2G verdict, Siddharth Behura, former Telecom Secretary, 2G spectrum, Indian Express Siddharth Behura

Acquitted by the CBI special court, former Telecom Secretary and a co-accused in the 2G spectrum allocation scam, Siddharth Behura, has said that decision-making in the bureaucracy has been a casualty in the wake of action against officers like him.

“Even today I would have done the same thing. I don’t think I did any wrong and I simply followed procedures,” Behura told The Indian Express. “The biggest collateral of the entire proceedings have been institutions and the decision-making within the bureaucracy. No officer wants to take a decision as they fear they may be accused of wrongdoing or corruption later,” he added.

The December 21 judgment pronounced by O P Saini, CBI Special Judge, does not point to any wrong-doing on his part. “If authorities needed me for their investigation, they could have called me for questioning. I still don’t know why I was arrested and behind bars for 15 months,” he said. Behura was in Tihar jail between February 2011 and May 2012 and was released after he got bail from the Supreme Court.

Behura joined Department of Telecommunications (DoT) in Ministry of Communications & Information Technology as Secretary (Telecom) on Jan 1, 2008, almost eight months after A Raja took over as Telecom minister. In August 2007, the DoT initiated the process of allotment of 2G spectrum along with Unified Access Services.

The CBI alleged that A Raja, in conspiracy with Siddhartha Behura, falsified records (relating to the manner in which Letter of Intent was to be issued to applicants) to cheat the Department of Telecommunications by manipulating the allocation of new licences and thereby wrongfully benefited accused persons and companies.

Also Read | 2G case verdict: Everything was leaking at DoT, no blame can be cast on any of the accused alone, said court

In fact, the prosecution argued that Raja and Behura were custodians of spectrum and they breached the trust reposed by the Government by illegally allocating it. The judge, however, said: “Perusal of evidence reveals that there is absolutely no evidence at all showing any ingredients of the offence of criminal breach of trust. Accordingly, there is no evidence at all showing commission of offence of criminal breach of trust by any of the accused.” Declining to comment on the then CAG’s claims of loss of Rs 1.76 lakh crore, Behura said that was for the government to look into. He said the case was still not over with the CBI expected to challenge the verdict in High Court.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. K
    Dec 28, 2017 at 11:55 am
    In a way, as citizens, we all are hand in gloves with the hapless bureaucrats and politicians as we enjoyed a plethora of choice among telecom service providers sometime back. As an illustration just compare the voice quality of today to 8 years back and one will realize how the service levels have deteriorated dramatically due to oligarchic model of the present telecom sector. It seems the issue was stretched too far and wide with some other motive which is now obvious. And of course there is collateral damage that the ex-secretary is talking about.
    1. Sankaran Krishnan
      Dec 28, 2017 at 7:33 am
      It is a known fact that most of the Bureaucrats and Politicians are hand-in-glove and if proper distance is not maintained between them they too has to suffer which is the biggest lesson and whether the so called IAS Offices learnt it or not is the ??? The Independence of Bureaucracy is broken by some selfish IAS Offices and the result is what we are seeing the spoiled image of the IAS Officers and at times they lose their credibility for associating with them which end up to arrest and as he rightly pointed out the fear factor makes them NOT to Decide and thus their Administrative capacities are crushed in front of them which is their own making and will they change and keep distance with Politicians is the query??? Why not check up whether the IAS Officers can file an defemation case against CBI and the Judge who had sentenced Jail term and the mental agony that was caused with such unwarranted arrest and loss of re tion among the society and as well the family ???